Abstract
Introduction Immunosenescence leads to increased morbidity and mortality associated with viral infections and weaker vaccine responses. This has been well documented for seasonal influenza and the current pandemic with Sars-Cov2, which disproportionately impact older adults, particularly those in residential aged care facilities. Inadequate nutrient intake associated with impaired immunity, respiratory and muscle function are likely to augment the effects of immunosenescence. In this study, we test whether the effects of inadequate nutrition can be reversed by multi-nutrient supplementation, consequently enhancing vaccine responses, reducing the risk of viral infections, and improving respiratory and muscle function.
Methods and analysis The Pomerium Study is a 12-week, single-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial testing the effects of two daily servings of an oral multi-nutrient supplement (330 kcal, 20g protein, 1.2g CaHMB, 449mg calcium, 520IU vitamin D3, and 25 vitamins and minerals) on the immune system and muscle and respiratory function of older adults in aged-care in Melbourne, Australia. 160 older adults (≥75 years old) will be recruited from aged-care facilities and randomised to treatment (multi-nutrient supplement) or control (usual care). Primary outcome is the change in T-cell subsets CD8+ and CD28null counts at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention. Secondary outcomes measured at baseline and after 12 weeks post-intervention are multiple markers of immunosenescence, body composition (bioimpedance), handgrip strength (dynamometer), physical function (short physical performance battery), respiratory function (spirometry), and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). Incidence and complications of COVID-19 and/or viral infections (i.e., hospitalisation, complications, or death) will be recorded throughout the trial.
Discussion If the Pomerium Study demonstrates efficacy and safety of a multi-nutrient supplement on immune, muscle and respiratory function, it may be suitable as a strategy to reduce the adverse outcomes from seasonal influenza and viral infections such as COVID-19 in older adults in aged-care.
Funding, Ethics, Registration and Dissemination The study is funded by the Australian Medical Research Future Fund. It is approved by Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref No. HREC/73985/MH-2021, ERM Ref No. RMH73985, Melbourne Health Site Ref No. 2021.115), and registered at ANZCTR (12621000420842). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and made available to aged-care stakeholders, including providers, residents, and government bodies.
Article Summary Strengths and Limitations
This is the first study performing a comprehensive immune, respiratory and functional assessment in aged care residents after receiving a multi-nutrient solution that is commercially available.
Our design and tested intervention assure that the results of the study will be rapidly translated into practice.
The main limitation is that any biological effect observed cannot be attributed to one component of the multi-nutrient supplement.
Another limitation is that the potential effect of group differences in energy intake on outcomes can only be monitored by assessing regular dietary intake and weight changes during the study period.
Competing Interest Statement
GD and SI serve as members of the Advisory Board of Abbott Australia. GD serves on the Scientific Advisory Board at TSI Pharmaceuticals. BK is currently supported by a research fellowship from TSI Pharmaceuticals. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
ACTRN12621000420842
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a grant from the 2020 Rare Cancers Rare Diseases and Unmet Need COVID-19 grants program by the Australian Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
It is approved by Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref No. HREC/73985/MH-2021, ERM Ref No. RMH73985, Melbourne Health Site Ref No. 2021.115)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
e-mail addresses:
Ahmed Al Saedi – ahmed.mohan{at}unimelb.edu.au
Ben Kirk – ben.kirk{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sandra Iuliano – sandraib{at}unimelb.edu.au
Jesse Zanker – jesse.zanker{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sara Vogrin – sara.vogrin{at}unimelb.edu.au
Lata Jayaram – lata.jayaram{at}unimelb.edu.au
Shane Thomas – shane.thomas{at}optusnet.com.au
Christine Golding – christine.golding62{at}bigpond.com
Diana Navarro-Perez – d.navarroperez{at}unimelb.edu.au
Petra Marusic – petra.marusic{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sean Leng – sleng1{at}jhmi.edu
Ralph Nanan – ralph.nanan{at}sydney.edu.au
Gustavo Duque – gustavo.duque{at}unimelb.edu.au
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors