Abstract
Objectives To assess how accurately a genetic risk score (GRS) can identify incident prostate cancer in men seeing their general practitioner with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Design Cohort study.
Setting UK Biobank data linked to primary care records.
Participants Men registered with the UK Biobank, eligible for the primary care data linkage, with a record showing that they consulted their general practitioner with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that could indicate possible undiagnosed prostate cancer.
Main outcome measures A diagnosis of prostate cancer within two years of the patient’s first consultation with their general practitioner for LUTS.
Results A GRS is associated with prostate cancer in men with symptoms (OR=2.54 [2.16 to 2.99] p=5e-29). An integrated risk model including age and GRS applied to symptomatic men predicted prostate cancer with an AUC of 0.768 (0.739 to 0.796). Men aged 40 years and under in the bottom four GRS quintiles, aged 50 years and under in the bottom two GRS quintiles, and aged 50 to 60 years in the bottom GRS quintile had a two-year prostate cancer incidence below 1%, despite the presence of symptoms. The negative predictive value of the combined model exceeded 99%.
Conclusions This study is the first to apply a genetic risk score in a clinical setting to improve the triage of men with symptoms of prostate cancer. It demonstrates the added benefit of incorporating an estimate of genetic risk of prostate cancer into the clinical assessment of symptomatic men in primary care. Assessment of prostate cancer risk in men with LUTS is currently based on presenting clinical features alone. Men with the lowest genetic risk of developing prostate cancer could safely avoid invasive investigation, with adequate safety netting, whilst those identified with the greatest risk could be fast-tracked for further investigation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a generous donation from the Higgins family. The donor had no input into the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, write up, or decision to submit this article for publication. This donation supported SB and HG to carry out their parts in this study. This research is linked to the CanTest Collaborative, which is funded by Cancer Research UK [C8640/A23385], of which SM is Clinical Research Fellow. All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involves only openly available human data, which can be obtained from the UK Biobank at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data can be obtained from the UK Biobank at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access
https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access
