Abstract
Background We investigated treatment effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily Life (ACT-DL) on psychological flexibility (PF) and the moderating role of the therapeutic working alliance on these effects in patients with early psychosis.
Methods ACT-DL is an ecological momentary intervention (EMI) combining face-to-face ACT with a smartphone app. In the multi-center INTERACT randomized controlled trial, n=148 early psychosis individuals were randomized to either treatment as usual (TAU as the control condition, n=77) or to ACT-DL in addition to TAU (ACT-DL + TAU as the experimental condition, n=71). We assessed global PF and the therapeutic alliance with self-report questionnaires. In addition, we used the experience sampling methodology (ESM) to assess PF with a momentary (in-the-moment and since-the-previous-beep openness) and an evening (daily PF) questionnaire. Assessments took place at baseline, post-intervention (POST), six (FU6), and twelve months (FU12) follow-up.
Results Global (B=19.49 to 33.14; all P-values<.001) and daily PF (B=0.68; P-value<.001) improved equally in both conditions at each time point. Individuals in the ACT-DL condition improved more than those in TAU on momentary openness (in-the-moment openness at POST (B=0.32; P-value=0.007) and since-the-previous-beep openness at POST (B=0.33; P<.001) and FU6 (B=0.23; P-value=0.025). Client-perceived working alliance moderated in-the-moment openness such that larger improvements in openness at POST (B=0.05; P-value<.001) were found in ACT-DL in individuals with higher working alliance scores.
Conclusion Our results provide partial support for the capability of ACT-DL to improve daily life measures of openness, and emphasize the importance of the therapeutic relationship in supporting processes of change.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NTR4252 (Dutch Trial Register)
Clinical Protocols
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3912-4
Funding Statement
This work was supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant (ERC - 2012 - StG, project 309767 - INTERACT) and FWO Odysseus Grant (no. G0F8416N) to IMG as well as a NWO VENI Grant (no. 451 - 13 - 022) and DFG Heisenberg professorship (no. 389624707) to UR.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The trial received ethical approval from the Medical Ethics Review Committees (MERC) at Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), the Netherlands (reference: NL46439.068.13) and the University Clinic Leuven, Belgium (reference: B322201629214).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos