Abstract
Introduction The terms “precision medicine” and “personalised medicine” have become key terms in health-related research, and in science-related public communication. However, the application of these two concepts and their interpretation in various disciplines are heterogeneous, which also affects research translation and public awareness. This leads to confusion regarding the use and distinction of the two concepts.
Methods and analysis Our study aims at using Rodger’s concept analysis method to systematically examine and distinguish the current understanding of the concepts “precision medicine” and “personalised medicine” in clinical medicine, biomedicine (incorporating genomics and bioinformatics), health services research; physics, chemistry, engineering; machine learning, and artificial intelligence, and to identify their respective attributes (clusters of characteristics) and surrogate and related terms. We will analyse similarities and differences in definitions in the respective disciplines and across different (sub)disciplines. The analysis procedure will include (1) a concept identification, (2) a setting, sample, and data source selection, (3) data collection, (4) data analysis and data summary, (5) identification of examples, and (6) identification of implications for further concept development.
Ethics and dissemination Following ethical and research standards, we will comprehensively report the methodology for a systematic analysis following Roger’s[1] concept analysis method. Our systematic concept analysis will contribute to the clarification of the two concepts and distinction in their application in given settings and circumstances. Such a broader concept analysis will contribute to non-systematic syntheses of the concepts, or occasional systematic reviews on one of the concepts that have been published in specific disciplines, in order to facilitate interdisciplinary communication, translational medical research, and implementation science.
Strengths and limitations of this study
In contrast to previous studies, we examine the definitions of “precision medicine” and “personalised medicine” in specific selected disciplines in order to facilitate interdisciplinary communication, translational medical research, and implementation science.
Moreover, we analyse these two concepts systematically and base our review on renowned concept analysis methodology.
Our study contributes to the clarification of the two concepts, their attributes, and differences in various disciplines.
Concepts are constantly developing and their meanings change over time, and hence it is not possible for our analysis to deliver an unequivocal definition.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by and has been delivered in partnership with Our Health in Our Hands (OHIOH), a strategic initiative of the Australian National University, which aims to transform health care by developing new personalized health technologies and solutions in collaboration with patients, clinicians, and health care providers. AT gratefully acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council (ARC) (DP190101864 and FT200100939) and NATO Science for Peace and Security Program AMOXES.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study will involve only openly available human data published in peer-reviewed journal articles.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author notes.
Data Availability
All data that will be produced in the present study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors.
