Article Information
History
- January 11, 2022.
Article Versions
- You are currently viewing Version 1 of this article (January 11, 2022 - 11:54).
- View Version 2, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- Jocelyn F. Hafer1,2,*,
- Julien A. Mihy1,
- Andrew Hunt1,
- Ronald F. Zernicke2,3,4 and
- Russell T. Johnson5
- 1Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
- 2School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- 5Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- ↵*Corresponding author contact information:
Jocelyn Hafer, 100 Discovery Blvd, 338 Tower at STAR, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, phone: 302-831-3471, email: jfhafer{at}udel.edu
Posted January 11, 2022.
IMU-derived kinematics detect gait differences with age or knee osteoarthritis but differ from marker-derived inverse kinematics
