Abstract
Humans commonly have low level antibodies to poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) due to environmental exposure. Lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 contain small amounts of PEG but it is not known if PEG antibodies are enhanced by vaccination and if there are any consequences. We studied plasma from 55 people receiving the Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine for PEG-specific antibodies. Anti-PEG IgG was commonly detected prior to vaccination and was boosted a mean of 1.78-fold (range 0.68 to 16.6) by vaccination. Anti-PEG IgM increased 2.64-fold (0.76 to 12.84) following vaccination. PEG antibodies did not impact the neutralizing antibody response to vaccination. Pre-existing levels of anti-PEG IgM correlated with increased reactogenicity. A rise in PEG antibodies following vaccination was associated with an increase in the association of PEG-based nanoparticles to blood immune cells ex vivo. We conclude that low level PEG-specific antibodies can be modestly boosted by a lipid nanoparticle mRNA-vaccine and that PEG-specific antibodies are associated with higher reactogenicity. The longer-term clinical impact of the increase in PEG-specific antibodies induced by lipid nanoparticle mRNA-vaccines should be monitored.
One-Sentence Summary A rise in PEG antibodies following mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccination was associated with higher reactogenicity and PEG particle–leukocyte interactions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Australian Medical Research Future Fund grants 2005544; Australian Research Council awards DP210103114 and DP200100231; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council grants 1149990; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator or Fellowship grants (SJK, KK, JJ, AKW, FC, DAW and THON); RMIT Vice Chancellor Postdoctoral Fellowship (YJ)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All subjects provided written informed consent and the studies were approved by the University of Melbourne human research and ethics committee (approvals 2056689, 21198153983 and 2021-21626-15756-1) and the Royal Melbourne Hospital human research and ethics committee (approvals 6309/MH-2020, 2013.290 and 68355/MH-2020).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
