The hyper-transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant exhibits significant antigenic change, vaccine escape and a switch in cell entry mechanism

Main

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is based primarily on vaccines that induce immunity to the spike glycoprotein. These vaccines have become the cornerstone of the global public health response to SARS-CoV-2¹. However, their effectiveness is now being threatened by the emergence of Variants of Concern (VOC) displaying enhanced transmissibility and evasion of host immunity². Of the five VOCs that have emerged, the Beta variant (B.1.351) and Gamma (P.1) variants were associated primarily with immune evasion; they spread locally but never dominated globally. In contrast, the Alpha (B.1.1.7) and Delta (B.1.617.2) VOCs spread globally and were responsible for significant waves of infections and an increase in reproduction number (R₀). The Alpha and Delta variants harbour mutations within the polybasic cleavage site in spike (a H681 in Alpha and R681 in Delta) that enhance cleavage by furin; changes that are associated with enhanced cell entry and may contribute to increased transmissibility. While the Alpha variant spread rapidly, it was in turn replaced by the Delta variant that combined augmented transmissibility with significant immune evasion^2–5.

Omicron (lineage B.1.1.529) is the fifth variant to be named as a VOC by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and was first detected in mid-November 2021 in Botswana, South Africa⁶ and in quarantined travellers in Hong Kong⁷. It has since split into three divergent sublineages (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3) of which BA.1 now dominates worldwide.

Emerging data indicate that the Omicron variant evades neutralisation by sera obtained from people vaccinated with 1 or 2 doses of vaccine, especially when antibody titres are waning. Indicative studies have shown that 3 doses of spike-based vaccines may provide only partial protection from infection with this variant, including unpublished data made available as a press release from Pfizer. Immune evasion by Omicron may have contributed to the extremely high transmission rates in countries with high vaccination rates or natural immunity (R₀ of 3-5 in the U K ^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.}

In this study, we investigate the antigenic and biological properties of the Omicron variant that might underlie immune evasion and increased transmission of the virus using both in vitro assays and real-life population data.

Results

Emergence of the Omicron variant in the UK

Despite high vaccination rates and levels of natural immunity following previous exposure in the UK, Omicron has rapidly become dominant. The evolutionary relationships of SARS-CoV-2 variants at a global level are shown in Fig.1c. The first 8 cases of Omicron were detected in the UK on the 27^th and 28^th November 2021 (2 in England and 6 in Scotland). Due to the rapid spread of Omicron, early genome sequences were highly related with an average genetic divergence between 1 and 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Fig.1d). The phylogenetic relationship to Omicron sequences from other countries was consistent with multiple introductions associated with travel to South Africa followed by community transmission.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1: Spike amino acid changes typifying the Omicron variant.

a, Spike homotrimer in open conformation with locations of Omicron amino acid substitutions, deletions (Δ), or insertions (ins) highlighted as spheres with opaque surface representation. Colouring highlights mutations at residues with substitutions impacting RBD-specific antibodies of classes 1 (green), 2 (yellow), and 3 (blue)²⁸, or that belong to the NTD antibody supersite (magenta)²⁶, or that belong to the FCS (orange), with the remainder in grey. These are annotated on the monomer with an ‘up’ receptor-binding domain. The substitution D614G which is shared by common descent by all lineage B.1 descendants is italicised. The visualisation is made using a complete spike model²⁹ which is in turn based upon a partial cryo-EM structure (RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: 6VSB³⁰. b, Aligned heatmaps showing properties of amino acid residues or of the specific amino acid substitution present in the Omicron variant, as appropriate (insertion not shown). Structure-based epitope scores³¹ for residues in the structure of the original genotype spike in closed and open conformations are shown. For RBD residues, the results of deep mutational scanning (DMS) studies show the escape fraction (that is, a quantitative measure of the extent to which a mutation reduced polyclonal antibody binding) for each mutant averaged across plasma (‘plasma average’) and for the most sensitive plasma (‘plasma max’)²⁰. Each mutation is classified as having evidence for mutations affecting neutralisation by either mAbs^{27, 32–35} or antibodies in convalescent plasma from previously infected or vaccinated individuals^{20, 34–36}. Membership of the furin cleavage site is shown. The distance to ACE2-contacting residues that form the receptor-binding site (RBS) is shown (RBS defined as residues with an atom <4Å of an ACE2 atom in the structure of RBD bound to ACE2 (RCSB PDB ID: 6M0J³⁷. Finally, ACE2 binding scores representing the binding constant (Δlog10 KD) relative to the wild-type reference amino acid from DMS experiments³⁸. c, Inferred evolutionary relationships of SARS-CoV-2 from NextStrain (https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global) with the Variants of Concern labelled. The colours of the tree tips correspond to the number of mutations causing Spike amino acid substitutions relative to the SARS-CoV-2 original genotype (OG) reference strain Wuhan-Hu-1. d, Inferred evolutionary relationships of the first 111 Omicron sequences in Scotland with NHS Scottish Health boards denoted: AA, Ayrshire and Arran; FF, Fife; FV, Forth Valley; GC, Great Glasgow and Clyde; GR, Grampian; HG, Highlands; LN, Lanarkshire; LO, Lothian; TY, Tayside, see key.

Neutralising responses to Omicron (BA.1) are substantially reduced following double and partially restored following triple vaccination

Levels of nAbs in patient sera correlate strongly with protection from infection^39–42, and reductions in neutralising activity against the Alpha and Delta variants are consistent with a reduction in vaccine effectiveness^{2–5, 43}. To predict the effect of the mutations within the Omicron spike glycoprotein on vaccine effectiveness, sera collected from healthy volunteers at more than 14 days post-2^nd dose vaccination with either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 or mRNA-1273 were sorted into three age-matched groups (n=24 per group, mean age 45 years). Sera were first screened by electrochemiluminescence (MSD-ECL) assay for reactivity with SARS-CoV-2 antigens (Spike, RBD, NTD or nucleoprotein (N)). The antibody responses to RBD and NTD were significantly higher (p<0.0001) in the sera from individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in comparison with the ChAdOx1 vaccinees (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). In contrast, antibody responses to endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) (Extended data Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2) or influenza (Extended data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S3) were similar, with the exception of coronavirus OC43, where responses in BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccinees differed significantly, perhaps suggesting modulation (back-boosting) of pre-existing OC43 responses by BNT162b2 vaccination.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 2 Antibody responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Antibody responses were studied in three groups of individuals (n=24 per group) receiving primary vaccination with either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 or mRNA-1273 by a, MSD-ECL assay or b, pseudotype-based neutralisation assay. a, Responses were measured against full-length spike glycoprotein (Spike), receptor binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD) and nucleoprotein (N) and are expressed as arbitrary units (AU/ml). b, NAb responses were quantified against Wuhan or Omicron spike glycoprotein bearing HIV (SARS-CoV-2) pseudotypes. Each point represents the mean of three replicates, bar represents the group mean. To assess the effect of booster vaccines antibody responses were studied in two groups of individuals primed with two doses of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 and boosted with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 antigens was measured by c, MSD-ECL assay while neutralising activity d, & e, was measured using HIV (SARS-CoV-2) pseudotypes, as above. Green data points represent those boosted with mRNA-1273, all others received BNT162b2. In panel d, & e, % Omicron neutralising refers to the proportion of serum samples that displayed neutralising activity against Omicron pseudotypes.

Next, the nAb responses against SARS-CoV-2 pseudotypes expressing the spike glycoprotein from either Wuhan-Hu-1, or Omicron (BA.1) were compared (Fig. 2b). Vaccination with mRNA-1273 elicited the highest nAb titres (mean titre Wuhan=21,118, Omicron=285), in comparison with those elicited by vaccination with either BNT162b2 (Wuhan=4978, Omicron=148.3) or ChAdOx1 (Wuhan=882.3, Omicron=61.9). Neutralising antibody titres against Wuhan differed significantly between the three study groups. Activity against Omicron was markedly reduced in comparison with Wuhan, reduced by 33-fold for BNT162b2, 14-fold for ChAdOX1 and 74-fold for mRNA-1273 (Supplementary Table 4). While the fold change in neutralisation was lowest in recipients of the ChAdOx1 vaccine and highest in recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, absolute neutralisation values were highest in mRNA-1273 followed by BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1. Neutralisation was lowest in the ChAdOx1 group, however it is important to note that this was given to older patients during early vaccine rollout in the UK, especially to vulnerable patients in nursing homes and was not recommended in young adults less than 40 years of age.

Next, samples were analysed from vaccine recipients at least 14 days post booster vaccination (third dose). Participants had been primed with two doses of either ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2, followed by a third dose of either BNT162b2 (full dose) or mRNA-1273 (half dose; 50µg). All sera reacted strongly with SARS-CoV-2 antigens by MSD-ECL, with no significant differences between the four groups (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 5). Antibody responses to HCoVs (Extended data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 6) or influenza (Extended data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 7) were similar, with the exception of influenza Michigan H1, where responses in ChAdOx1-primed and BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273-boosted groups differed significantly, likely reflecting co-administration of influenza booster vaccines during the booster campaign. Two vaccine recipients boosted with BNT162b2 displayed weak reactivity with nucleocapsid (Fig. 2c), suggesting previously undetected exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Sera from vaccine recipients primed with BNT162b2 and boosted with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 displayed similar titres of nAb against Wuhan to the samples collected post-dose 2 (Fig. 2d). In contrast, vaccination of individuals primed with ChAdOx1 with a booster dose of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 resulted in a marked increase in antibody titre (9.3-fold increase) against Wuhan relative to the low titres after dose 2 (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Table 8). The marked increase in antibody titre in ChAdOx1-primed individuals (Extended data Fig. 5) emphasises the importance of the third dose booster in this population. Indeed, following boost with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, anti-Wuhan nAb titres in the ChAdOx1-primed group were not significantly different from those primed with BNT162b2 (Supplementary Table 8). NAb titres against Omicron were lower in both booster study groups and did not differ significantly in titre (Supplementary Table 8). However, absolute numbers displaying measurable Omicron neutralising activity were higher in the ChAdOx1-primed group (13/21, 62%) compared with the BNT162p2 primed group (5/20, 25%) (Fig. 2d, Fig. 2e).

Vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant is reduced compared to the Delta variant

A logistic additive model with a test negative case control design was used to estimate relative vaccine effectiveness against becoming a confirmed case with Delta (4911 cases) and/or Omicron (6166 cases) in a population of 1.2 million people in the largest health board in Scotland, NHS GG&C, between 22^nd and 28^th December 2021. Demographic data are shown in Supplementary Table 9. The timing of first doses of vaccination are shown in Fig.3a and the occurrence of sequenced/confirmed infections with different variants in vaccine recipients over time is shown in Fig.3b. Infection status for Omicron and Delta was modelled by number and product type of vaccine doses, previous infection status, sex, SIMD quartile, and age (to control for demographic bias). Immunosuppressed individuals were removed from the analysis to ensure case-positivity could be attributed to vaccine escape rather than an inability to mount a vaccine response, with immunosuppression status derived from a list of those in GG&C shielding due to immunosuppression or listed as being given immunosuppressant drugs. Age and time since vaccination were each modelled as single smooth effects using thin plate regression splines⁴⁴.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3 Vaccine deployment and vaccine effectiveness estimates

a, Denominator (violin) plot showing populations of test positive and test negative cohorts in NHS GG&C, with the widths of the grey bands represent the populations in each group at each time point. VOC classification of sequenced cases are overlaid as a dotplot, with points coloured by their VOC and a random jitter applied along the x-axis for visual clarity. b, Boxplots of date of first administered vaccine dose by vaccine product for the population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GG&C) aged 18 and older. The box limits are the quartiles and the centre line is the median, with whisker length of 1.5 times the interquartile range. Outliers are shown as dots outwith the whisker range. Data points are overlaid as a dotplot with points shown as black dots, with a random jitter along the x-axis applied for visual clarity. c, Error bar plot of estimated vaccine effectiveness against testing positive for Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population of over 18s in NHS GG&C who were tested between 6^th and 12^th December 2021. The points and corresponding text represent the estimated vaccine effectiveness (%) for each group, for each variant, with the error bar endpoints representing the endpoints of the corresponding 95% CIs. The additive effect of infection-acquired immunity was calculated for the entire population and plotted for the unvaccinated cohort.

The protection from vaccine-acquired and infection-acquired immunity were estimated as being markedly reduced against Omicron compared with Delta. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness in recent recipients (at 14 days post-dose) were only 11.44% for full primary courses of ChAdOx1 against Omicron and 78.92% against Delta. For two doses of mRNA vaccines, vaccine effectiveness was significantly lower for Omicron than Delta; BNT162b2 (26.02% versus 83.55%) and mRNA-1273 (23.70% versus 87.82%) (Fig.3c). These responses were similar following a third booster dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 against Delta (85.94% and 86.53%, respectively), but increased significantly against Omicron (43.22% and 46.38%, respectively). These estimates are in keeping with those reported recently against symptomatic infection in England where vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 71.4% and 75.5% for ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 primary course recipients boosted with BNT162b2, respectively⁹.

Next, we estimated the additive protective effect of previous natural infection. Infection-acquired immunity directed against other VOCs may be broader in nature and may wane more slowly than that induced by vaccines^45–47. The level of protection following previous infection was 33.9% for Omicron, and 77.4% for Delta. This level of protection was greater than that observed following two doses of vaccine for Omicron but did not reach the levels attained by those who had never had natural infection and had received third dose boosters for either Omicron or Delta. Collectively, these results emphasise the importance of booster vaccines. Importantly, vaccine-mediated protection against severe disease is likely to be more durable than that against detected infection⁴⁸.

Absence of syncytia in Omicron-infected cells

Our data demonstrate that antigenic change in Omicron permits evasion of vaccine induced immunity, however, the constellation of spike mutations in Omicron suggest that functional change may also contribute to its rapid transmission (Fig.1a). Therefore, we investigated the virological properties of live Omicron isolated from a patient sample. SARS-CoV-2 particles can achieve membrane fusion at the cell surface following proteolytic activation of spike by the plasma membrane protease TMPRSS2. This property also permits spike-mediated fusion of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells with adjacent cells resulting in syncytia⁴⁹; a feature that has been associated with severe disease⁵⁰. Moreover, the Delta variant has been shown to exhibit enhanced fusion compared to the Alpha and Beta variants⁵¹.

A split GFP cell-cell fusion system⁵² was used to quantify syncytia formation n by Omicron, Delta and first wave Wuhan D614G virus (Fig. 4a). Cells expressing split GFP were infected with Wuhan-D614G, Delta or Omicron and the levels of the reconstituted GFP signal following cell-cell fusion was determined in real time (Fig. 4c). In addition, infected cells were probed by indirect immunofluorescence assay to assess viral replication by the detection of the viral nucleocapsid protein (Fig. 4b). The Delta variant exhibited the highest levels of cell fusion followed by Wuhan D614G. In contrast, the Omicron variant failed to form syncytia. This failure was not due to lack of infection as immunofluorescent detection of nucleocapsid protein confirmed viral replication by Omicron, Wuhan D614G and Delta¹⁸.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 4. Omicron exhibits reduced syncytia formation and has switched entry route preference

a, Schematic representation of the split GFP system, used in this study to quantify virus induced cell fusion. This system is based on co-culture of two different cell lines (GFP-10 and GFP-11) expressing split GFP molecules. Upon virus-induced cell fusion, the intact GFP molecule is reconstituted, and the resulting signal can be detected and quantified. b, GFP-10 and GFP-11 A549 ACE2 TMPRSS2 cells were co-cultured and infected with Wuhan D614G, Delta and Omicron and incubated in a CLARIOStar Plus (BMG LABTECH) at 37°C / 5% CO₂. Micrographs display cells 22 hours post infection: reconstituted GFP (green), N viral nucleocapsid (red), and DAPI nuclear counter stain (blue). Scale bars 100µm. c, To quantify, GFP signal was measured every 30 min for 20h. Omicron infected cells showed only background levels of GFP signal. d, Calu-3 cells were infected with Wuhan D614G, Delta and Omicron and supernatants were collected at the indicated times and assessed by RT-qPCR. Omicron display reduced replication kinetics compared to Wuhan D614G and Omicron. e, SARS CoV-2 entry can occur via two routes. Route 1 permits rapid fusion at the cell surface following proteolytic processing by TMPRSS2. In Route 2 fusion occurs following endocytosis after processing by cathepsin B or L. Route 1 and 2 can be specifically inhibited using the protease inhibitors Camostat and E64d, respectively. f, SARS-CoV-2 pseudotype infection of the stated cell lines, data represent mean luciferase values from one representative experiment. In Calu-3 cells Route 1 entry predominates whereas HEK exclusively support Route 2, A549 ACE2 TMPRSS2 cells permit both routes. Pangolin CoV spike is included as a control; it can only achieve entry via Route 2. Pseudotypes without viral glycoproteins (No) are included as a negative control. g, Relative SARS-CoV-2 pseudotype infection (compared to untreated control) of cells treated with 10μM protease inhibitors. Data represent mean of four replicates, error bars indicate standard error of the mean, asterisks indicate statistical significance (ANOVA). h, Titration of Camostat and E64d against Delta, Omicron and Pangolin CoV in A549 ACE2 TMPRSS2 cells, data points represent mean relative infection, compared to untreated control.

Discussion

The Omicron variant represents a major change in biological function and antigenicity of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we demonstrate substantial immune escape of the Omicron variant. We present clear evidence of vaccine failure in dual-vaccinated individuals and partial restoration of immunity following a third booster dose of mRNA vaccine. In addition, we demonstrate a shift in the SARS-CoV-2 entry pathway from cell surface fusion, triggered by TMPRSS2, to cathepsin-dependent fusion within the endosome. This fundamental biological shift may affect the pathogenesis and severity of disease and requires further evaluation in population-based studies.

Using sera from double vaccine recipients, Omicron was found to be associated with a drop in neutralisation greater in magnitude than that reported in all other variants of concern (including Beta and Delta). Boosting enhanced neutralising responses to both the vaccine strain (Wuhan) and Omicron, particularly in recipients of ChAdOx1, but did not completely overcome the inherent immune escape properties of Omicron. Importantly, we did not assess the impact of vaccination on clinical severity of disease which is likely to be much higher than detection of infection. Protection against severe disease is longer lasting than prevention of infection. We also did not measure the impact of vaccination on T cell immunity which may be better preserved as only 14% of CD8+ and 28% of CD4+ epitopes are predicted to be affected by key Omicron mutations¹².

The probability of infection with Omicron versus infection with the preceding Delta variant was significantly higher in double vaccine recipients, in keeping with the neutralisation data. A third dose of mRNA vaccine substantially reduced the probability of infection but did not restore immunity fully.

The emergence of a highly transmissible variant that is associated with escape from vaccine-induced immune responses means that over time, Omicron-specific vaccines may be required if disease severity was high, either directed at the general population or vulnerable groups. Early indications in young people are that Omicron infection is 40-70% less severe than Delta infection^{65, 66} similar calculations in the most vulnerable part of the population over the age of 40 years are awaited.

Genotypic changes in new variants have previously been shown to alter viral phenotype by modulating innate immune responses as well as evasion of the adaptive immune response^{67, 68}. Additionally, mutations can alter spike functionality to impact transmission and pathogenesis²⁴. Such changes may have provided emergent viruses with a selective advantage in lung cells and primary human airway epithelial cells. Enhanced spike activation by the plasma membrane protease TMPRSS2, may have enabled more rapid cell surface fusion⁵⁴. In this study, we found that the Omicron variant has switched entry pathway to use TMPRSS2-independent endosomal fusion preferentially, a major change in the biological behaviour of the virus. This switching in the mechanism of fusion activation also manifests in reduced syncytia formation in infected cells, likely to reduce the cell-to-cell transmission characteristics of other variants. These properties have the potential to change cellular tropism and disease pathogenesis significantly. However, even a variant that is less virulent with a very high transmission rate may continue to present a substantial risk to older people and those with co-morbidities, especially those with immunosuppression. Moreover, our work demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits high antigenic and functional plasticity; further fundamental shifts in transmission and disease should be anticipated.

Methods

Funding

Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) - the Evaluation of Variants Affecting Deployed COVID-19 Vaccine (EVADE) study (ECT, SR, OM, CW, BJW) (grant code: 2021.0155).

COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [grant code: MC_PC_19027], and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute (RMB, DLR, ECT).

Medical Research Council (MRC) - the COVID-19 DeplOyed VaccinE (DOVE) study (grant code: MCUU1201412) and COG-UK (ECT).

Medical Research Council (MRC) (grant code: MC_UU_12014/12) (AF, JH, RO, JG, ECT and DLR)

Medical Research Council (MRC) (grant codes: MR/R024758/1 and MR/W005611/1) (WTH)

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) - G2P-UK National Virology Consortium (MR/W005611/1) (MP, ECT, AP, DLR).

Wellcome Trust (grant code: 220977/Z/20/Z) (DLR)

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant code: BBSRC, BB/R004250/1) (NL, BJW)

Wellcome Trust and Royal Society Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (grant code: 107653/Z/15/A) (JG)

Author contributions

Conceptualization: ECT, JG, MP, DLR, BW

Methodology: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, NL, GL, WF, SS, MM, AS, WTH, CD, RO, JH, DP, KP, AF, GY, SS, RMP, PRM, AHP, JH, DLR, SR

Investigation: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, NL, GL, WF, SS, MM, AS, SA, EV, WTH, CD, RO, JH, PH, VS, DP, KP, AF, GY, SS, MTGH, RG, KT,AHP, JH,DLR,MP,SR

Visualization: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, GL, WTH, DLR

Funding acquisition: ECT, DLR, SR, BJW, JG

Project administration: ECT, DLR, SR, JH,

Supervision: BJW, DLR, MP, SR, JH, ECT

Writing – original draft: ECT, BJW, JG, GY

Writing – review & editing: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, SA, WTH, DLR, MP, ECT

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability

The experimental data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request but restrictions apply to the availability of clinical data, which were used under ethical approvals for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Anonymised data are available with permission of the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde SafeHaven.

Codes used in this analysis are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Biological materials including cell lines are available on reasonable request from the authors. Clinical samples are restricted for use under the ethical approvals obtained for their use.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Brian J. Willett, Joe Grove, Oscar A. MacLean, Craig Wilkie, Nicola Logan, Giuditta De Lorenzo & Wilhelm Furnon

These authors contributed equally: John Haughney, David L. Robertson, Massimo Palmarini, Surajit Ray & Emma C. Thomson

Contributions

Conceptualization: ECT, JG, MP, DLR, BW

Methodology: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, NL, GL, WF, SS, MM, AS, WTH, CD, RO, JH, DP, KP, AF, GY, SS, RMP, PRM, AHP, JH, DLR, SR

Investigation: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, NL, GL, WF, SS, MM, AS, SA, EV, WTH, CD, RO, JH, PH, VS, DP, KP, AF, GY, SS, MTGH, RG, KT, AHP, JH, DLR, MP, SR

Visualization: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, GL, WTH, DLR

Funding acquisition: ECT, DLR, SR, BJW, JG

Project administration: ECT, DLR, SR, JH

Supervision: BJW, DLR, MP, SR, JH, ECT

Writing – original draft: ECT, BJW, JG, GY

Writing – review & editing: BJW, JG, OAM, CW, SA, WTH, DLR, MP, ECT

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Professor Emma Thomson (emma.thomson{at}glasgow.ac.uk) and Professor Brian Willett (brian.willett{at}glasgow.ac.uk), MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, UK, G61 1QH.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Extended Data

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended data Fig.1. HCoV reactivity following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Antibody responses were studied in three groups of individuals (n=24 per group) vaccinated with either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 or mRNA-1273 by MSD-ECL assay. Responses were measured against full-length spike glycoprotein (Spike) from HCoVs 229E, OC43, NL63 and HKU1 and are expressed as MSD arbitrary units (AU/ml). The response to OC43 was significantly higher in BNT162b2 vaccinates than in ChAdOx1 vaccinates.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended data Fig. 2. Influenza reactivity following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Antibody responses were studied in three groups of individuals (n=24 per group) vaccinated with either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 or mRNA-1273 by MSD-ECL assay. Responses were measured against haemagglutinins from influenza viruses; influenza A Michigan H1, Hong Kong H3 and Shanghai H7, and influenza B Phuket HA and Brisbane and are expressed as MSD arbitrary units (AU/ml). No significant differences were detected between the vaccine groups for each of the antigens.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended data Fig. 3. HCoV reactivity following third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Antibody responses were studied in four groups of individuals primed with two doses of either ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2, followed by a booster of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Responses were measured by MSD-ECL assay against full-length spike glycoprotein (Spike) from HCoVs 229E, OC43, NL63 and HKU1 and are expressed as MSD arbitrary units (AU/ml).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended data Fig. 4. Influenza reactivity following third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Antibody responses were studied in four groups of individuals primed with two doses of either ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2, followed by a booster of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Responses were measured by MSD-ECL against haemagglutinins from influenza viruses; influenza A Michigan H1, Hong Kong H3 and Shanghai H7, and influenza B Phuket HA and Brisbane and are expressed as MSD arbitrary units (AU/ml). * Significantly different p=0.0413.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 5. Effect of third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on neutralising antibody titres.

Two groups of healthy volunteers vaccinated with two doses of either ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2, were sampled two weeks following a third dose of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Each point represents the mean of three replicates. Where dose 2 and dose 3 samples were available from the same individual, points are joined by a solid line.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig.6. Isolation of Omicron in cell culture.

a, Vero ACE2 TMPRSS2 (VAT) and BHK-hACE2 cells were inoculated with diluted clinical samples. Viral progeny was quantified in the medium 5 dpi by RT-qPCR. b, Aliquots of the medium from samples named 204 and 205 were used to generate a P1 in BHK-hACE2 and Calu-3 cells and, limited to sample 205, a P2 in Calu-3 and Caco2 cells. Viral stocks were quantified by RT-qPCR.

The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium - June 2021 V.1

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Samuel C Robson ^{13, 84}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Thomas R Connor ^{11, 74} and Prof Nicholas J Loman ⁴³

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Tanya Golubchik ⁵

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Rocio T Martinez Nunez ⁴⁶

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr David Bonsall ⁵

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Project administration, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Prof Andrew Rambaut ¹⁰⁴

Funding acquisition, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Luke B Snell ¹²

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Rich Livett ¹¹⁶

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Catherine Ludden ^{20, 70}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Sally Corden ⁷⁴ and Dr Eleni Nastouli ^{96, 95, 30}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Gaia Nebbia ¹²

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Ian Johnston ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Prof Katrina Lythgoe ⁵, Dr M. Estee Torok ^{19, 20} and Prof Ian G Goodfellow ²⁴

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Visualisation:

Dr Jacqui A Prieto ^{97, 82} and Dr Kordo Saeed ^{97, 83}

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr David K Jackson ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Catherine Houlihan ^{96, 94}

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Dan Frampton ^{94, 95}

Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr William L Hamilton ¹⁹ and Dr Adam A Witney ⁴¹

Funding acquisition, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Giselda Bucca ¹⁰¹

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Project administration:

Dr Cassie F Pope ^{40, 41}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Catherine Moore ⁷⁴

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Sequencing and analysis:

Prof Emma C Thomson ⁵³

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Ewan M Harrison ^{116, 102}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Prof Colin P Smith ¹⁰¹

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, and Sequencing and analysis:

Fiona Rogan ⁷⁷

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Shaun M Beckwith ⁶, Abigail Murray ⁶, Dawn Singleton ⁶, Dr Kirstine Eastick ³⁷, Dr Liz A Sheridan ⁹⁸, Paul Randell ⁹⁹, Dr Leigh M Jackson ¹⁰⁵, Dr Cristina V Ariani ¹¹⁶ and Dr Sónia Gonçalves ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Derek J Fairley ^{3, 77}, Prof Matthew W Loose ¹⁸ and Joanne Watkins ⁷⁴

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, and Visualisation:

Dr Samuel Moses ^{25, 106}

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Sam Nicholls ⁴³, Dr Matthew Bull ⁷⁴ and Dr Roberto Amato ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision, Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Prof Darren L Smith ^{36, 65, 66}

Leadership and supervision, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Prof David M Aanensen ^{14, 116} and Dr Jeffrey C Barrett ¹¹⁶

Metadata curation, Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Dinesh Aggarwal ^{20, 116, 70}, Dr James G Shepherd ⁵³, Dr Martin D Curran ⁷¹ and Dr Surendra Parmar71

Metadata curation, Project administration, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Matthew D Parker ¹⁰⁹

Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Catryn Williams ⁷⁴

Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Sharon Glaysher ⁶⁸

Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Anthony P Underwood ^{14, 116}, Dr Matthew Bashton ^{36, 65}, Dr Nicole Pacchiarini ⁷⁴, Dr Katie F Loveson ⁸⁴ and Matthew Byott ^{95, 96}

Project administration, Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Alessandro M Carabelli ²⁰

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, and Metadata curation:

Dr Kate E Templeton ^{56, 104}

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, and Project administration:

Dr Thushan I de Silva ¹⁰⁹, Dr Dennis Wang ¹⁰⁹, Dr Cordelia F Langford ¹¹⁶ and John Sillitoe ¹¹⁶

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, and Samples and logistics:

Prof Rory N Gunson ⁵⁵

Funding acquisition, Leadership and supervision, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Simon Cottrell ⁷⁴, Dr Justin O’Grady ^{75, 103} and Prof Dominic Kwiatkowski ^{116, 108}

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Project administration:

Dr Patrick J Lillie ³⁷

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Nicholas Cortes ³³, Dr Nathan Moore ³³, Dr Claire Thomas ³³, Phillipa J Burns ³⁷, Dr Tabitha W Mahungu ⁸⁰ and Steven Liggett ⁸⁶

Leadership and supervision, Metadata curation, and Sequencing and analysis:

Angela H Beckett ^{13, 81} and Prof Matthew TG Holden ⁷³

Leadership and supervision, Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Lisa J Levett ³⁴, Dr Husam Osman ^{70, 35} and Dr Mohammed O Hassan-Ibrahim ⁹⁹

Leadership and supervision, Project administration, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr David A Simpson ⁷⁷

Leadership and supervision, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Meera Chand ⁷², Prof Ravi K Gupta ¹⁰², Prof Alistair C Darby ¹⁰⁷ and Prof Steve Paterson ¹⁰⁷

Leadership and supervision, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Prof Oliver G Pybus ²³, Dr Erik M Volz ³⁹, Prof Daniela de Angelis ⁵², Prof David L Robertson ⁵³, Dr Andrew J Page ⁷⁵ and Dr Inigo Martincorena ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Louise Aigrain ¹¹⁶ and Dr Andrew R Bassett ¹¹⁶

Metadata curation, Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Nick Wong ⁵⁰, Dr Yusri Taha ⁸⁹, Michelle J Erkiert ⁹⁹ and Dr Michael H Spencer Chapman ^{116, 102}

Metadata curation, Project administration, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Rebecca Dewar ⁵⁶ and Martin P McHugh ^{56, 111}

Metadata curation, Project administration, and Software and analysis tools:

Siddharth Mookerjee ^{38, 57}

Metadata curation, Project administration, and Visualisation:

Stephen Aplin ⁹⁷, Matthew Harvey ⁹⁷, Thea Sass ⁹⁷, Dr Helen Umpleby ⁹⁷ and Helen Wheeler ⁹⁷

Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr James P McKenna ³, Dr Ben Warne ⁹, Joshua F Taylor ²², Yasmin Chaudhry ²⁴, Rhys Izuagbe ²⁴, Dr Aminu S Jahun ²⁴, Dr Gregory R Young ^{36, 65}, Dr Claire McMurray ⁴³, Dr Clare M McCann ^{65, 66}, Dr Andrew Nelson ^{65, 66} and Scott Elliott ⁶⁸

Metadata curation, Samples and logistics, and Visualisation:

Hannah Lowe ²⁵

Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Anna Price ¹¹, Matthew R Crown ⁶⁵, Dr Sara Rey ⁷⁴, Dr Sunando Roy ⁹⁶ and Dr Ben Temperton ¹⁰⁵

Metadata curation, Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

Dr Sharif Shaaban ⁷³ and Dr Andrew R Hesketh ¹⁰¹

Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Kenneth G Laing ⁴¹, Dr Irene M Monahan ⁴¹ and Dr Judith Heaney ^{95, 96, 34}

Project administration, Samples and logistics, and Visualisation:

Dr Emanuela Pelosi ⁹⁷, Siona Silviera ⁹⁷ and Dr Eleri Wilson-Davies ⁹⁷

Samples and logistics, Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Helen Fryer ⁵

Sequencing and analysis, Software and analysis tools, and Visualization:

Dr Helen Adams ⁴, Dr Louis du Plessis ²³, Dr Rob Johnson ³⁹, Dr William T Harvey ^{53, 42}, Dr Joseph Hughes ⁵³, Dr Richard J Orton ⁵³, Dr Lewis G Spurgin ⁵⁹, Dr Yann Bourgeois ⁸¹, Dr Chris Ruis ¹⁰², Áine O’Toole ¹⁰⁴, Marina Gourtovaia ¹¹⁶ and Dr Theo Sanderson ¹¹⁶

Funding acquisition, and Leadership and supervision:

Dr Christophe Fraser ⁵, Dr Jonathan Edgeworth ¹², Prof Judith Breuer ^{96, 29}, Dr Stephen L Michell ¹⁰⁵ and Prof John A Todd ¹¹⁵

Funding acquisition, and Project administration:

Michaela John ¹⁰ and Dr David Buck ¹¹⁵

Leadership and supervision, and Metadata curation:

Dr Kavitha Gajee ³⁷ and Dr Gemma L Kay ⁷⁵

Leadership and supervision, and Project administration:

Prof Sharon J Peacock ^{20, 70} and David Heyburn ⁷⁴

Leadership and supervision, and Samples and logistics:

Katie Kitchman ³⁷, Prof Alan McNally ^{43, 93}, David T Pritchard ⁵⁰, Dr Samir Dervisevic ⁵⁸, Dr Peter Muir⁷⁰, Dr Esther Robinson ^{70, 35}, Dr Barry B Vipond ⁷⁰, Newara A Ramadan ⁷⁸, Dr Christopher Jeanes ⁹⁰, Danni Weldon ¹¹⁶, Jana Catalan ¹¹⁸ and Neil Jones ¹¹⁸

Leadership and supervision, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Ana da Silva Filipe ⁵³, Dr Chris Williams ⁷⁴, Marc Fuchs ⁷⁷, Dr Julia Miskelly ⁷⁷, Dr Aaron R Jeffries ¹⁰⁵, Karen Oliver ¹¹⁶ and Dr Naomi R Park ¹¹⁶

Metadata curation, and Samples and logistics:

Amy Ash ¹, Cherian Koshy ¹, Magdalena Barrow ⁷, Dr Sarah L Buchan ⁷, Dr Anna Mantzouratou ⁷, Dr Gemma Clark ¹⁵, Dr Christopher W Holmes ¹⁶, Sharon Campbell ¹⁷, Thomas Davis ²¹, Ngee Keong Tan ²², Dr Julianne R Brown ²⁹, Dr Kathryn A Harris ^{29, 2}, Stephen P Kidd ³³, Dr Paul R Grant ³⁴, Dr Li Xu- McCrae ³⁵, Dr Alison Cox ^{38, 63}, Pinglawathee Madona ^{38, 63}, Dr Marcus Pond ^{38, 63}, Dr Paul A Randell ^{38, 63}, Karen T Withell ⁴⁸, Cheryl Williams ⁵¹, Dr Clive Graham ⁶⁰, Rebecca Denton-Smith ⁶², Emma Swindells ⁶², Robyn Turnbull ⁶², Dr Tim J Sloan ⁶⁷, Dr Andrew Bosworth ^{70, 35}, Stephanie Hutchings ⁷⁰, Hannah M Pymont ⁷⁰, Dr Anna Casey ⁷⁶, Dr Liz Ratcliffe ⁷⁶, Dr Christopher R Jones ^{79, 105}, Dr Bridget A Knight ^{79, 105}, Dr Tanzina Haque ⁸⁰, Dr Jennifer Hart ⁸⁰, Dr Dianne Irish-Tavares ⁸⁰, Eric Witele ⁸⁰, Craig Mower ⁸⁶, Louisa K Watson ⁸⁶, Jennifer Collins ⁸⁹, Gary Eltringham ⁸⁹, Dorian Crudgington ⁹⁸, Ben Macklin ⁹⁸, Prof Miren Iturriza-Gomara ¹⁰⁷, Dr Anita O Lucaci ¹⁰⁷ and Dr Patrick C McClure ¹¹³

Metadata curation, and Sequencing and analysis:

Matthew Carlile ¹⁸, Dr Nadine Holmes ¹⁸, Dr Christopher Moore ¹⁸, Dr Nathaniel Storey ²⁹, Dr Stefan Rooke ⁷³, Dr Gonzalo Yebra ⁷³, Dr Noel Craine ⁷⁴, Malorie Perry ⁷⁴, Dr Nabil-Fareed Alikhan ⁷⁵, Dr Stephen Bridgett ⁷⁷, Kate F Cook ⁸⁴, Christopher Fearn ⁸⁴, Dr Salman Goudarzi ⁸⁴, Prof Ronan A Lyons ⁸⁸, Dr Thomas Williams ¹⁰⁴, Dr Sam T Haldenby ¹⁰⁷, Jillian Durham ¹¹⁶ and Dr Steven Leonard ¹¹⁶

Metadata curation, and Software and analysis tools:

Robert M Davies ¹¹⁶

Project administration, and Samples and logistics:

Dr Rahul Batra ¹², Beth Blane ²⁰, Dr Moira J Spyer ^{30, 95, 96}, Perminder Smith ^{32, 112}, Mehmet Yavus ^{85, 109}, Dr Rachel J Williams ⁹⁶, Dr Adhyana IK Mahanama ⁹⁷, Dr Buddhini Samaraweera ⁹⁷, Sophia T Girgis ¹⁰², Samantha E Hansford ¹⁰⁹, Dr Angie Green ¹¹⁵, Dr Charlotte Beaver ¹¹⁶, Katherine L Bellis ^{116, 102}, Matthew J Dorman ¹¹⁶, Sally Kay ¹¹⁶, Liam Prestwood ¹¹⁶ and Dr Shavanthi Rajatileka ¹¹⁶

Project administration, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Joshua Quick ⁴³

Project administration, and Software and analysis tools:

Radoslaw Poplawski ⁴³

Samples and logistics, and Sequencing and analysis:

Dr Nicola Reynolds ⁸, Andrew Mack ¹¹, Dr Arthur Morriss ¹¹, Thomas Whalley ¹¹, Bindi Patel ¹², Dr Iliana Georgana ²⁴, Dr Myra Hosmillo ²⁴, Malte L Pinckert ²⁴, Dr Joanne Stockton ⁴³, Dr John H Henderson ⁶⁵, Amy Hollis ⁶⁵, Dr William Stanley ⁶⁵, Dr Wen C Yew ⁶⁵, Dr Richard Myers ⁷², Dr Alicia Thornton ⁷², Alexander Adams ⁷⁴, Tara Annett ⁷⁴, Dr Hibo Asad ⁷⁴, Alec Birchley ⁷⁴, Jason Coombes ⁷⁴, Johnathan M Evans ⁷⁴, Laia Fina ⁷⁴, Bree Gatica-Wilcox ⁷⁴, Lauren Gilbert ⁷⁴, Lee Graham ⁷⁴, Jessica Hey ⁷⁴, Ember Hilvers ⁷⁴, Sophie Jones ⁷⁴, Hannah Jones ⁷⁴, Sara Kumziene-Summerhayes ⁷⁴, Dr Caoimhe McKerr ⁷⁴, Jessica Powell ⁷⁴, Georgia Pugh ⁷⁴, Sarah Taylor ⁷⁴, Alexander J Trotter ⁷⁵, Charlotte A Williams ⁹⁶, Leanne M Kermack ¹⁰², Benjamin H Foulkes ¹⁰⁹, Marta Gallis ¹⁰⁹, Hailey R Hornsby ¹⁰⁹, Stavroula F Louka ¹⁰⁹, Dr Manoj Pohare ¹⁰⁹, Paige Wolverson ¹⁰⁹, Peijun Zhang ¹⁰⁹, George MacIntyre-Cockett ¹¹⁵, Amy Trebes ¹¹⁵, Dr Robin J Moll ¹¹⁶, Lynne Ferguson ¹¹⁷, Dr Emily J Goldstein ¹¹⁷, Dr Alasdair Maclean ¹¹⁷ and Dr Rachael Tomb ¹¹⁷

Samples and logistics, and Software and analysis tools:

Dr Igor Starinskij ⁵³

Sequencing and analysis, and Software and analysis tools:

Laura Thomson ⁵, Joel Southgate ^{11, 74}, Dr Moritz UG Kraemer ²³, Dr Jayna Raghwani ²³, Dr Alex E Zarebski ²³, Olivia Boyd ³⁹, Lily Geidelberg ³⁹, Dr Chris J Illingworth ⁵², Dr Chris Jackson ⁵², Dr David Pascall ⁵², Dr Sreenu Vattipally ⁵³, Timothy M Freeman ¹⁰⁹, Dr Sharon N Hsu ¹⁰⁹, Dr Benjamin B Lindsey¹⁰⁹, Dr Keith James ¹¹⁶, Kevin Lewis ¹¹⁶, Gerry Tonkin-Hill ¹¹⁶ and Dr Jaime M Tovar-Corona ¹¹⁶

Sequencing and analysis, and Visualisation:

MacGregor Cox ²⁰

Software and analysis tools, and Visualisation:

Dr Khalil Abudahab ^{14, 116}, Mirko Menegazzo ¹⁴, Ben EW Taylor MEng ^{14, 116}, Dr Corin A Yeats ¹⁴, Afrida Mukaddas ⁵³, Derek W Wright ⁵³, Dr Leonardo de Oliveira Martins ⁷⁵, Dr Rachel Colquhoun ¹⁰⁴, Verity Hill ¹⁰⁴, Dr Ben Jackson ¹⁰⁴, Dr JT McCrone ¹⁰⁴, Dr Nathan Medd ¹⁰⁴, Dr Emily Scher ¹⁰⁴ and Jon-Paul Keatley ¹¹⁶

Leadership and supervision:

Dr Tanya Curran ³, Dr Sian Morgan ¹⁰, Prof Patrick Maxwell ²⁰, Prof Ken Smith ²⁰, Dr Sahar Eldirdiri ²¹, Anita Kenyon ²¹, Prof Alison H Holmes ^{38, 57}, Dr James R Price ^{38, 57}, Dr Tim Wyatt ⁶⁹, Dr Alison E Mather ⁷⁵, Dr Timofey Skvortsov ⁷⁷ and Prof John A Hartley ⁹⁶

Metadata curation:

Prof Martyn Guest ¹¹, Dr Christine Kitchen ¹¹, Dr Ian Merrick ¹¹, Robert Munn ¹¹, Dr Beatrice Bertolusso ³³, Dr Jessica Lynch ³³, Dr Gabrielle Vernet ³³, Stuart Kirk ³⁴, Dr Elizabeth Wastnedge ⁵⁶, Dr Rachael Stanley ⁵⁸, Giles Idle ⁶⁴, Dr Declan T Bradley ^{69, 77}, Dr Jennifer Poyner ⁷⁹ and Matilde Mori ¹¹⁰

Project administration:

Owen Jones ¹¹, Victoria Wright ¹⁸, Ellena Brooks ²⁰, Carol M Churcher ²⁰, Mireille Fragakis ²⁰, Dr Katerina Galai ^{20, 70}, Dr Andrew Jermy ²⁰, Sarah Judges ²⁰, Georgina M McManus ²⁰, Kim S Smith ²⁰, Dr Elaine Westwick ²⁰, Dr Stephen W Attwood ²³, Dr Frances Bolt ^{38, 57}, Dr Alisha Davies ⁷⁴, Elen De Lacy ⁷⁴, Fatima Downing ⁷⁴, Sue Edwards ⁷⁴, Lizzie Meadows ⁷⁵, Sarah Jeremiah ⁹⁷, Dr Nikki Smith ¹⁰⁹ and Luke Foulser ¹¹⁶

Samples and logistics:

Dr Themoula Charalampous ^{12, 46}, Amita Patel ¹², Dr Louise Berry ¹⁵, Dr Tim Boswell ¹⁵, Dr Vicki M Fleming ¹⁵, Dr Hannah C Howson-Wells ¹⁵, Dr Amelia Joseph ¹⁵, Manjinder Khakh ¹⁵, Dr Michelle M Lister ¹⁵, Paul W Bird ¹⁶, Karlie Fallon ¹⁶, Thomas Helmer ¹⁶, Dr Claire L McMurray ¹⁶, Mina Odedra ¹⁶, Jessica Shaw ¹⁶, Dr Julian W Tang ¹⁶, Nicholas J Willford ¹⁶, Victoria Blakey ¹⁷, Dr Veena Raviprakash ¹⁷, Nicola Sheriff ¹⁷, Lesley-Anne Williams ¹⁷, Theresa Feltwell ²⁰, Dr Luke Bedford ²⁶, Dr James S Cargill ²⁷, Warwick Hughes ²⁷, Dr Jonathan Moore ²⁸, Susanne Stonehouse ²⁸, Laura Atkinson ²⁹, Jack CD Lee ²⁹, Dr Divya Shah ²⁹, Adela Alcolea-Medina ^{32, 112}, Natasha Ohemeng-Kumi ^{32, 112}, John Ramble ^{32, 112}, Jasveen Sehmi ^{32, 112}, Dr Rebecca Williams ³³, Wendy Chatterton ³⁴, Monika Pusok ³⁴, William Everson ³⁷, Anibolina Castigador ⁴⁴, Emily Macnaughton ⁴⁴, Dr Kate El Bouzidi ⁴⁵, Dr Temi Lampejo ⁴⁵, Dr Malur Sudhanva ⁴⁵, Cassie Breen ⁴⁷, Dr Graciela Sluga ⁴⁸, Dr Shazaad SY Ahmad ^{49, 70}, Dr Ryan P George ⁴⁹, Dr Nicholas W Machin ^{49, 70}, Debbie Binns ⁵⁰, Victoria James ⁵⁰, Dr Rachel Blacow ⁵⁵, Dr Lindsay Coupland ⁵⁸, Dr Louise Smith ⁵⁹, Dr Edward Barton ⁶⁰, Debra Padgett ⁶⁰, Garren Scott ⁶⁰, Dr Aidan Cross ⁶¹, Dr Mariyam Mirfenderesky ⁶¹, Jane Greenaway ⁶², Kevin Cole ⁶⁴, Phillip Clarke ⁶⁷, Nichola Duckworth ⁶⁷, Sarah Walsh ⁶⁷, Kelly Bicknell ⁶⁸, Robert Impey ⁶⁸, Dr Sarah Wyllie ⁶⁸, Richard Hopes ⁷⁰, Dr Chloe Bishop ⁷², Dr Vicki Chalker ⁷², Dr Ian Harrison ⁷², Laura Gifford ⁷⁴, Dr Zoltan Molnar ⁷⁷, Dr Cressida Auckland ⁷⁹, Dr Cariad Evans ^{85, 109}, Dr Kate Johnson ^{85, 109}, Dr David G Partridge ^{85, 109}, Dr Mohammad Raza ^{85, 109}, Paul Baker ⁸⁶, Prof Stephen Bonner ⁸⁶, Sarah Essex ⁸⁶, Leanne J Murray ⁸⁶, Andrew I Lawton ⁸⁷, Dr Shirelle Burton-Fanning ⁸⁹, Dr Brendan AI Payne ⁸⁹, Dr Sheila Waugh ⁸⁹, Andrea N Gomes ⁹¹, Maimuna Kimuli ⁹¹, Darren R Murray ⁹¹, Paula Ashfield ⁹², Dr Donald Dobie ⁹², Dr Fiona Ashford ⁹³, Dr Angus Best ⁹³, Dr Liam Crawford ⁹³, Dr Nicola Cumley ⁹³, Dr Megan Mayhew ⁹³, Dr Oliver Megram ⁹³, Dr Jeremy Mirza ⁹³, Dr Emma Moles-Garcia ⁹³, Dr Benita Percival ⁹³, Megan Driscoll ⁹⁶, Leah Ensell ⁹⁶, Dr Helen L Lowe ⁹⁶, Laurentiu Maftei ⁹⁶, Matteo Mondani ⁹⁶, Nicola J Chaloner ⁹⁹, Benjamin J Cogger⁹⁹, Lisa J Easton ⁹⁹, Hannah Huckson ⁹⁹, Jonathan Lewis ⁹⁹, Sarah Lowdon ⁹⁹, Cassandra S Malone ⁹⁹, Florence Munemo ⁹⁹, Manasa Mutingwende ⁹⁹, Roberto Nicodemi ⁹⁹, Olga Podplomyk ⁹⁹, Thomas Somassa ⁹⁹, Dr Andrew Beggs ¹⁰⁰, Dr Alex Richter ¹⁰⁰, Claire Cormie ¹⁰², Joana Dias ¹⁰², Sally Forrest ¹⁰², Dr Ellen E Higginson ¹⁰², Mailis Maes ¹⁰², Jamie Young ¹⁰², Dr Rose K Davidson ¹⁰³, Kathryn A Jackson ¹⁰⁷, Dr Lance Turtle ¹⁰⁷, Dr Alexander J Keeley ¹⁰⁹, Prof Jonathan Ball ¹¹³, Timothy Byaruhanga ¹¹³, Dr Joseph G Chappell ¹¹³, Jayasree Dey ¹¹³, Jack D Hill ¹¹³, Emily J Park ¹¹³, Arezou Fanaie ¹¹⁴, Rachel A Hilson ¹¹⁴, Geraldine Yaze ¹¹⁴ and Stephanie Lo ¹¹⁶

Sequencing and analysis:

Safiah Afifi ¹⁰, Robert Beer ¹⁰, Joshua Maksimovic ¹⁰, Kathryn McCluggage ¹⁰, Karla Spellman ¹⁰, Catherine Bresner ¹¹, William Fuller ¹¹, Dr Angela Marchbank ¹¹, Trudy Workman ¹¹, Dr Ekaterina Shelest ^{13, 81}, Dr Johnny Debebe ¹⁸, Dr Fei Sang ¹⁸, Dr Marina Escalera Zamudio ²³, Dr Sarah Francois ²³, Bernardo Gutierrez ²³, Dr Tetyana I Vasylyeva ²³, Dr Flavia Flaviani ³¹, Dr Manon Ragonnet-Cronin ³⁹, Dr Katherine L Smollett ⁴², Alice Broos ⁵³, Daniel Mair ⁵³, Jenna Nichols ⁵³, Dr Kyriaki Nomikou ⁵³, Dr Lily Tong ⁵³, Ioulia Tsatsani ⁵³, Prof Sarah O’Brien ⁵⁴, Prof Steven Rushton ⁵⁴, Dr Roy Sanderson ⁵⁴, Dr Jon Perkins ⁵⁵, Seb Cotton ⁵⁶, Abbie Gallagher ⁵⁶, Dr Elias Allara ^{70, 102}, Clare Pearson ^{70, 102}, Dr David Bibby ⁷², Dr Gavin Dabrera ⁷², Dr Nicholas Ellaby ⁷², Dr Eileen Gallagher ⁷², Dr Jonathan Hubb ⁷², Dr Angie Lackenby ⁷², Dr David Lee ⁷², Nikos Manesis ⁷², Dr Tamyo Mbisa ⁷², Dr Steven Platt ⁷², Katherine A Twohig ⁷², Dr Mari Morgan ⁷⁴, Alp Aydin ⁷⁵, David J Baker ⁷⁵, Dr Ebenezer Foster-Nyarko ⁷⁵, Dr Sophie J Prosolek ⁷⁵, Steven Rudder ⁷⁵, Chris Baxter ⁷⁷, Sílvia F Carvalho ⁷⁷, Dr Deborah Lavin ⁷⁷, Dr Arun Mariappan ⁷⁷, Dr Clara Radulescu ⁷⁷, Dr Aditi Singh ⁷⁷, Miao Tang ⁷⁷, Helen Morcrette ⁷⁹, Nadua Bayzid ⁹⁶, Marius Cotic ⁹⁶, Dr Carlos E Balcazar ¹⁰⁴, Dr Michael D Gallagher ¹⁰⁴, Dr Daniel Maloney ¹⁰⁴, Thomas D Stanton ¹⁰⁴, Dr Kathleen A Williamson ¹⁰⁴, Dr Robin Manley ¹⁰⁵, Michelle L Michelsen ¹⁰⁵, Dr Christine M Sambles ¹⁰⁵, Dr David J Studholme ¹⁰⁵, Joanna Warwick-Dugdale ¹⁰⁵, Richard Eccles ¹⁰⁷, Matthew Gemmell ¹⁰⁷, Dr Richard Gregory ¹⁰⁷, Dr Margaret Hughes ¹⁰⁷, Charlotte Nelson ¹⁰⁷, Dr Lucille Rainbow ¹⁰⁷, Dr Edith E Vamos ¹⁰⁷, Hermione J Webster ¹⁰⁷, Dr Mark Whitehead ¹⁰⁷, Claudia Wierzbicki ¹⁰⁷, Dr Adrienn Angyal ¹⁰⁹, Dr Luke R Green ¹⁰⁹, Dr Max Whiteley ¹⁰⁹, Emma Betteridge ¹¹⁶, Dr Iraad F Bronner ¹¹⁶, Ben W Farr ¹¹⁶, Scott Goodwin ¹¹⁶, Dr Stefanie V Lensing ¹¹⁶, Shane A McCarthy ^{116, 102}, Dr Michael A Quail ¹¹⁶, Diana Rajan ¹¹⁶, Dr Nicholas M Redshaw ¹¹⁶, Carol Scott ¹¹⁶, Lesley Shirley ¹¹⁶ and Scott AJ Thurston ¹¹⁶

Software and analysis tools:

Dr Will Rowe ⁴³, Amy Gaskin ⁷⁴, Dr Thanh Le-Viet ⁷⁵, James Bonfield ¹¹⁶, Jennifier Liddle ¹¹⁶ and Andrew Whitwham ¹¹⁶

1 Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, 2 Barts Health NHS Trust, 3 Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, 4 Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, 5 Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, 6 Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 7 Bournemouth University, 8 Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, 9 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 10 Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, 11 Cardiff University, 12 Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, 13 Centre for Enzyme Innovation, University of Portsmouth, 14 Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, University of Oxford, 15 Clinical Microbiology Department, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, 16 Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, 17 County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, 18 Deep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, 19 Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 20 Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, 21 Department of Microbiology, Kettering General Hospital, 22 Department of Microbiology, South West London Pathology, 23 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 24 Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, 25 East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, 26 East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, 27 East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, 28 Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, 29 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, 30 Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (GOS ICH), University College London (UCL), 31 Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Biomedical Research Centre, 32 Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, 33 Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 34 Health Services Laboratories, 35 Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, 36 Hub for Biotechnology in the Built Environment, Northumbria University, 37 Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, 38 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, 39 Imperial College London, 40 Infection Care Group, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 41 Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University of London, 42 Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, 43 Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, 44 Isle of Wight NHS Trust, 45 King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 46 King’s College London, 47 Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, 48 Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, 49 Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, 50 Microbiology Department, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, 51 Microbiology, Royal Oldham Hospital, 52 MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, 53 MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, 54 Newcastle University, 55 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 56 NHS Lothian, 57 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in HCAI and AMR, Imperial College London, 58 Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 59 Norfolk County Council, 60 North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, 61 North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, 62 North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, 63 North West London Pathology, 64 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, 65 Northumbria University, 66 NU-OMICS, Northumbria University, 67 Path Links, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, 68 Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, 69 Public Health Agency, Northern Ireland, 70 Public Health England, 71 Public Health England, Cambridge, 72 Public Health England, Colindale, 73 Public Health Scotland, 74 Public Health Wales, 75 Quadram Institute Bioscience, 76 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, 77 Queen’s University Belfast, 78 Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, 79 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, 80 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, 81 School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, 82 School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, 83 School of Medicine, University of Southampton, 84 School of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, 85 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 86 South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 87 Southwest Pathology Services, 88 Swansea University, 89 The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 90 The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, 91 The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 92 The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, 93 Turnkey Laboratory, University of Birmingham, 94 University College London Division of Infection and Immunity, 95 University College London Hospital Advanced Pathogen Diagnostics Unit, 96 University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 97 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, 98 University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, 99 University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, 100 University of Birmingham, 101 University of Brighton, 102 University of Cambridge, 103 University of East Anglia, 104 University of Edinburgh, 105 University of Exeter, 106 University of Kent, 107 University of Liverpool, 108 University of Oxford, 109 University of Sheffield, 110 University of Southampton, 111 University of St Andrews, 112 Viapath, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 113 Virology, School of Life Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, 114 Watford General Hospital, 115 Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, 116 Wellcome Sanger Institute, 117 West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 118 Whittington Health NHS Trust