Comparison of outcomes from COVID infection in pediatric and adult patients before and after the emergence of Omicron

Introduction

Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant is rapidly spreading in the United States (US) and its prevalence increased from 22.5% between 12/12/2021–12/18/2021 to 58.6% between 12/19/2021– 12/25/2021, according to CDC’s national SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance program¹. The Omicron variant is more contagious than the Delta variant². However, the data on the severity of the disease caused by the Omicron variant is scarce and incomplete³. Reports from South Africa⁴, Scotland⁵, and England⁶ showed lower rates of hospitalization following Omicron infection compared with infections from the Delta variant. Currently, data on the broader spectrum of disease severity caused by the Omicron variant compared with the Delta variant in the US is lacking. Here we compared the risks of ED visit, hospitalization, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation in patients who were first infected during the period when the Omicron variant was rapidly spreading in the US (“Emergent Omicron cohort”) and compared them to those in similar patients who were first infected during the period when the Delta variant predominated (“Delta cohort”) through a retrospective study of a large, geographically diverse database of patient electronic health record (EHR) data in the US. Outcomes in pediatric patients (age 0-4, 5-11 and 12-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥ 65 years) were examined.

METHODS

Results

Lower risks of 3-day acute negative outcomes in the Emergent Omicron cohort than in the matched Delta cohort

The 3-day risks in the Emergent Omicron cohort (n=14,040) were less than half of those in the matched Delta cohort (n=14,040): ED visit: 4.55% vs. 15.22% (RR: 0.30 [0.28-0.33]); hospitalization: 1.75% vs. 3.95% (RR: 0.44 [0.38-0.52]); ICU admission: 0.26% vs. 0.78% (RR: 0.33 [0.23-0.48]); mechanical ventilation: 0.07% vs. 0.43% (RR: 0.16 [0.08-0.32]) (Figure 1, top). On the other hand, there were no marked differences in the 3-day risks between the two matched Delta cohorts where patients in the Delta-2 cohort had their first infection between 11/16/2021–11/30/2021(Figure 1, bottom), suggesting that the differences in outcomes between the Emergent Omicron cohort and the Delta cohort are largely attributed to differences in the prevalence of the virus variants.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Comparison of 3-day acute outcomes (ED visit, hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation) between the matched Emergent Omicron and Delta cohorts (Top panel) and between the two matched Delta cohorts (Bottom panel). Emergent Omicron cohort – Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 12/15/2021–12/24/2021 and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Delta cohort – Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 9/1/2021–11/15/2021 and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Delta-2 cohort – Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 11/16/2021–11/30/2021, right before the emergence of the Omicron variant, and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cohorts were propensity-score matched for demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity), socioeconomic factors, transplant procedures, COVID-19 related comorbidities, COVID-19 related medications, and EHR-documented vaccination status.

Lower risk for 3-day hospitalization and ED admissions in the Emergent Omicron vs matched Delta cohort in children and adults

In children from the Emergent Omicron cohort under 5 years old (n=1,361), the 3-day risk for ED visit was 3.89%, significantly lower than 21.01% in the matched Delta cohort (RR: 0.19 [0.14-0.25]). The 3-day risk for hospitalization was 0.96%, significantly lower than 2.65% in the matched Delta cohort (RR: 0.36 [0.19-0.68]). Lower risks for ED visit and hospitalization were observed for the two other pediatric groups (aged 5-11 years, and 12-17 years), though differences were not significant for hospitalization, which may be due to the small number of 5– 11-year-old and 12–17-year-old who were hospitalized. The Emergent Omicron cohort had less severe disease than the matched Delta cohort for both adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥ 65 years) (Figure 2, top). In contrast, no marked differences were observed between the two matched Delta cohorts for all age groups (Figure 2, bottom).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Comparison of 3-day ED visit and hospitalization in children, adults, and older adults between propensity-score matched Emergent Omicron and Delta cohorts (Top panel) and between two matched Delta cohorts (Bottom panel). Emergent Omicron cohort - Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 12/15/2021–12/24/2021 and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Delta cohort–Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 9/1/2021–11/15/2021 and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Delta-2 cohort–Patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between 11/16/2021–11/30/2021, immediately prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant, and had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cohorts were propensity-score matched for demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity), socioeconomic factors, transplant procedures, COVID-19 relevant comorbidities and medications, and EHR-documented vaccination status.

Discussion

In this study using a nation-wide database of EHRs in the US, SARS-CoV-2 infected patients in the period when the Omicron variant emerged were demographically different from and had fewer adverse health conditions than those infected during the previous period when the Delta variant predominated. After matching for age, gender, race/ethnicity, adverse socio-economic determinants of health, COVID-related comorbidities and medications, and EHR-documented vaccination status, the 3-day risk of hospitalization from SARS-CoV-2 infections that occurred during the period when the Omicron variant emerged was 1.75%, less than half of the 3.95% observed for the period when the Delta variant predominated and little or no Omicron variant was recorded. This result is consistent with findings in South Africa⁴, Scotland⁵ and England⁶. In contrast, no major changes in hospitalization were observed for SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring during the two-week Delta variant period (11/16/2021–11/30/2021) that immediately preceded the emergence of the Omicron variant and the 10-week Delta variant period before it (9/1/2021–11/15/2021) indicative of relatively stable outcomes.

This study is among the first to provide evidence of reduced severity from infections that occurred in the period after the emergence of the Omicron variant in the US as compared to the period that preceded it. The 3-day risks from the Emergent Omicron cohort for ED visit was less than one-third of that for the Delta variant (4.55% vs 15.22%); for ICU admission, it was one-third of that for the Delta variant (0.26% vs 0.78%); for mechanical ventilation, it was one-sixth of that for the Delta variant (0.07% vs 0.43%). To test whether these differences in outcomes might represent merely the gradual accrual of immunized members of the population plus increasing availability of treatments designed to prevent hospitalization, we compared outcomes in patients who were first infected between 9/1/2021–11/15/2021 (Delta period) to those in patients who were first infected between 11/16/2021–11/30/2021 (Delta period immediately before Omicron emergence, which we called Delta-2). No marked differences in outcomes were found between these two Delta cohorts after propensity-score matching. These results further suggest that the Omicron variant is likely to be associated with milder disease outcomes than the Delta variant. Mortality risks were not reported in this study because so few deaths occurred within 3 days of infection in both cohorts: 23 (0.16%) vs. 30 (0.21%) among 14,040 patients in the matched Emergent Omicron and Delta cohorts. Longer follow-up times are needed to accurately estimate mortality risk.

Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalizations are rising in South Africa¹¹ and in the US. This is especially concerning given that in the US, children under the age of 5 are not eligible for COVID-19 vaccination, and children ages 5 through 11 are not eligible to receive boosters. This study shows that the risk for hospitalization in unvaccinated children under 5 years old that occurred after the emergence of the Omicron variant was one-third of that during the Delta variant period (0.96% vs. 2.65%) whereas the risk for ED visit was less than one-fifth (3.89% vs. 21.01%), both differences were significant. The same trends were observed for children 5-11 and 12-17 years old. These results suggest that while pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalizations are reportedly rising, the outcomes are milder after the emergence of the Omicron variant as compared to the predominant Delta variant period that preceded it. No significant differences in pediatric outcomes were observed between the two different Delta cohorts, suggesting that the differences in outcomes between the Emergent Omicron cohort and the Delta cohort are largely attributed to differences in the prevalence of the virus variants. The risks for hospitalization and ED visit were higher for children under 5 years old than for children 5-11 years old (0.96% vs 0.77% for hospitalization and 3.89% vs. 3.60% for ED visit), but these differences were not significant. ICU admissions and mechanical ventilation were not examined in the age-stratified groups due to limited sample sizes.

In summary, compared to patients first infected during 9/1-11/15, there is a marked decrease in ED visits, hospitalization and ICU utilization and mechanical ventilation for patients first infected during 12/15/-12/24. No such decreases were observed for patients first infected during 11/16/-11/30, immediately prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant, so there is no evidence of gradual waning of the Delta variant virulence or rapid ramp up of early COVID treatments, which are still not widely available. Though the decrease in disease severity in the Emergent Omicron cohort could reflect increases in vaccination and boosters in the population between November and December, the proportion would have had to be quite substantial to account for the large reductions that we observed. In addition, we did not observe similar decreases in disease severity for infections occurring right before the emergence of the Omicron variant, as might occur with a gradual ramp up of vaccination. Moreover, since we selected persons who had not had prior SARS-CoV2, it is unlikely that the milder results occurred because of persistence of viral mRNA from prior infection and not from new, acute infection. Taken together, it is likely that the emergence and increased prevalence of Omicron entrains milder diseases and is a major contributor to the observed decreases in disease severity. The estimated prevalence of the Omicron variant during 12/15-12/24 was only 22.5-58.6%, suggesting that the outcomes for the Omicron variant may be found to be even milder than what we report here as the prevalence of the Omicron variant increases. Findings from this study, combined with the approval of COVID-19 medications and the increases in numbers of people who are vaccinated and boosted, present a more encouraging picture of the population response to COVID infection.

Our study has several limitations: First, the observational, retrospective nature of this study of patient EHR data could introduce selection, information, testing, reporting and follow up issues. However, because we compared the different population all from the TriNetX dataset, these issues should not significantly affect the relative risk analyses. Second, patients in the TriNetX EHR database are those who had medical encounters with healthcare systems contributing to the TriNetX Platform and do not necessarily represent the entire US population. Therefore, results from the TriNetX platform need to be validated in other populations. Third, both the Emergent Omicron and Delta cohorts in our study were defined based on CDC’s national genomic sequence surveillance. The Emergent Omicron cohort likely contained some infections with the Delta variant, but this admixture would tend to reduce the observed differences. However, our findings of reduced hospitalization in the Emergent Omicron cohort compared to the Delta cohort is consistent with findings from Africa⁴, Scotland⁵, and England⁶ that were based on genomic sequences, and goes further to indicate that the severity in hospitalization is reduced. The fact that there were no marked differences between the two Delta cohorts yet significant differences between the Emergent Omicron and Delta cohorts further corroborates that the differences in outcomes for infections occurring between 12/15/2021–12/24/2021 were likely to be caused largely by the emerging Omicron variant. Fourth, we are unable to determine with certainty the vaccination status of the infected individuals as the SARS-CoV2 vaccination information in TriNetX is incomplete. The vaccination rate documented in TriNetX is only about 2%, whereas the reported vaccination rates during this time period¹² indicate that most patients in the study population were likely to have been vaccinated. However, the cohorts were propensity-score matched for EHR-documented vaccination status including vaccine types and booster along with demographics, adverse socioeconomic determinants of health and comorbidities, some of which are associated with vaccination acceptance^13,14. Finally, the findings apply only to infections that occurred in the US between 12/15/2021– 12/24/2021. Given the fast increases in the prevalence of the Omicron variant, including the potential for further viral mutations, future studies are imperative to closely follow up disease severity as well as longer term outcomes associated with infections from Omicron or other variants.

In summary, our analysis indicates that the emergence of the Omicron variant in the US was associated with significantly milder disease in the early phase of infection as compared to the Delta variant period that preceded it. Despite this encouraging result, further studies are needed to monitor the longer-term acute consequences from Omicron infection, the propensity for development of “long COVID”, the rapidity of spread, potential for mutation, and how the vaccines, boosters, or prior infections alter clinical responses. Additionally, although infections from the Omicron variant, based on this analysis, appear to be milder, because of Omicron’s increased transmissibility, the overall number of ED visits, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and mechanical ventilator patients may still be greater with the Omicron variant then the Delta variant.

Contributors

RX conceived, designed, and supervised the study, performed literature review and reviewed and drafted the manuscript. LW conducted all the experiments, performed data analysis and prepared tables and figures. NAB, PBD, DCK, and NDV critically contributed to study design, result interpretation and manuscript preparation. We confirm the originality of content.

Declaration of interests

LW, NAB, PBD, DCK, NDV, RX have no financial interests to disclose.

Role of Funder/Sponsor Statement

The funders have no roles in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Meeting Presentation

No