Abstract
Background Though detection of transmission clusters of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is a priority for infection control personnel in hospitals, the transmission dynamics of MRSA among hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) has not been thoroughly studied. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of MRSA isolates for surveillance is valuable for detecting outbreaks in hospitals, but the bioinformatic approaches used are diverse and difficult to compare.
Methods We combined short-read WGS with genotypic, phenotypic, and epidemiological characteristics of 106 MRSA BSI isolates collected for routine microbiological diagnosis from inpatients in two hospitals over 12 months. Clinical data and hospitalization history were abstracted from electronic medical records. We compared three genome sequence alignment strategies to assess similarity in cluster ascertainment. We conducted logistic regression to measure the probability of predicting prior hospital overlap between clustered patient isolates by the genetic distance of their isolates.
Results While the three alignment approaches detected similar results, they showed some variation. A pangenome-based alignment method was most consistent across MRSA clonal complexes. We identified nine unique clusters of closely-related BSI isolates. Most BSI were healthcare-associated and community-onset. Our logistic model showed that with 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms the likelihood that any two patients in a cluster overlapped in a hospital was 50 percent.
Conclusions Multiple clusters of closely related MRSA isolates can be identified using WGS among strains cultured from BSI in two hospitals. Genomic clustering of these infections suggest that transmission resulted from a mix of community spread and healthcare exposures long before BSI diagnosis.
Summary Multiple clusters of closely related MRSA bloodstream infections were identified using WGS in two hospitals using three bioinformatic workflows. Genomic epidemiology suggests that transmission resulted from a mix of community spread and healthcare exposures long before symptom onset.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Brooke M. Talbot, Michael Z. David and Timothy D. Read were supported by grant # AI139188 from the National Institute of Health (NIH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB the University of Pennsylvania IRB waived ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
brooke.talbot{at}emory.edu
natasia.jacko{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu
rpetit{at}emory.edu
david.pegues{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu
margotshumaker{at}gmail.com
tread{at}emory.edu
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at
https://github.com/Read-Lab-Confederation/MRSA_bloodstream_clusters
