Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began shortly after the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Wuhan, China in December of 2019. Since then, SARS-CoV-2 transmission has continued, resulting in millions of deaths globally due to COVID-19. Multiple vaccines produced using various technologies have been developed to confer immunity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein (mRNA-1273; BNT162b2; AD26.COV2.S; AZD1222), with approximately 8 billion doses administered to date (Ritchie 2021). Although clinical studies and real-world evidence have shown that these vaccines are highly effective in reducing severe disease and death due to COVID-19, there are also signs that their protection may be waning since vaccination campaigns began in late 2020. In addition, several SARS-CoV-2 variants have emerged with changes in the S protein receptor binding domain (RBD), enabling them to partially avoid neutralization in vaccinated persons. Five such variants have been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as variants of concern (VOCs): B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and most recently B.1.1.529 (Omicron). The development of variant-specific vaccines and the use of homologous vaccine booster doses are both being investigated as potential avenues to bolster protection against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.

Novavax has developed a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant S protein nanoparticle vaccine (SARS-CoV-2 rS), comprising the full length, pre-fusion trimers of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein, co-formulated with a saponin-based adjuvant, Matrix-M™ (NVX-CoV2373). Favorable vaccine efficacy (VE) for NVX-CoV2373 against mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 was established in two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of healthy and medically stable adult participants using a two-dose series (two doses administered 3 weeks apart). One trial of 15,139 participants in the United Kingdom (UK) found VEs of 89.7% (95% CI: 80.2, 94.6) for all participants, 86.3% (95% CI: 71.3, 93.5) for the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant and 96.4% (95% CI: 73.8, 99.5) for the ancestral strain. In a second trial of 29,582 participants in the United States of America (USA) and Mexico, the resultant VE was 90.4% (95% CI: 82.9, 94.6) for all participants, 100.0% (95% CI: 80.8, 100.0) for non-VOC or variant of interest (VOI), 93.2% (95% CI: 83.9, 97.1) for VOC/VOIs, and 93.6% (81.7, 97.8) for participants whose SARS-CoV-2 variant was B.1.1.7 (Alpha) (Dunkle 2021, Heath 2021).

As part of an ongoing phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of NVX-CoV2373, a single booster dose was administered to healthy adult participants approximately 6 months following their primary two-dose vaccination series (Formica 2021). Immunogenicity and safety data through 28 days following the booster dose are now available and can be compared with those observed following the primary vaccination series in the same participant population.

METHODS

Randomization and Masking

The randomization schemes used in this trial were executed using a centralized interactive response technology (IRT) system according to pre-generated randomization schedules. At the start of the trial, participants were randomly assigned to one of five initial treatment groups (1:1:1:1:1) as previously described by Formica (Formica 2021; Figure 1). Of the five treatment groups, one was a placebo control (Group A) and two were active vaccine groups that were considered for additional vaccination with a booster (Group B and Group C). After approximately 6 months, consenting participants who had been randomized to receive a primary vaccination series of either two doses of NVX-CoV2373 (5 μg SARS-CoV-2 rS + 50 μg Matrix-M adjuvant) on Day 0 and Day 21 (Group B) or one dose of NVX-CoV2373 (5 μg SARS-CoV-2 rS + 50 μg Matrix-M adjuvant) on Day 0 and placebo on Day 21 (Group C) were re-randomized 1:1 to receive either a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 at the same dose level (Groups B2 and C2) or placebo (Groups B1 or C1) at Day 189. Participants could decline re-randomization for any reason (eg, they had already received an emergency authorized vaccine). Group B participants are the main focus of this article as they were vaccinated using the NVX-CoV2373 dose and regimen proposed for approval and commercial distribution. All other treatment groups are continuing to be followed for safety events only.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Consort Diagram for Study 2019nCoV-101 (Part 2): Booster Dosing of Group B Participants

All vaccinations were prepared and administered on an outpatient basis by designated site personnel in a way to maintain the blind. Participants and other site staff remained blinded to individual treatment assignment.

RESULTS

A total of 1610 participants were screened from 24 August 2020 to 25 September 2020, and 1,283 participants were enrolled and treated. All but three participants randomized to Group B (n=257) received both doses of NVX-CoV2373 in their primary vaccination series and were considered for investigation of a single booster dose at the same dose level (Figure 1). Re-randomization of Group B participants took place at Day 189, with 210 consenting participants assigned 1:1 to receive a single booster of NVX-CoV2373 in Group B2 (n=104) or placebo in Group B1 (n=106). In Group B2, all but one participant received active vaccine as a booster; this participant received placebo in error and was assessed for safety in Group B1. All but six participants in Group B1 received placebo as a booster; of the remaining six participants, four did not receive any booster (of which, one was included in Group B1 for safety due to an ongoing adverse event) and two received active vaccine in error as a booster and were assessed for safety in Group B2. All but one participant in Group A received placebo for all three doses, with the remaining participant receiving active vaccine as a booster dose.

Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the active (Group B2) and placebo (Group B1) booster groups (Table 1), except for a higher proportion of female participants in Group B1 (58%) than Group B2 (45%). Across Groups A, B1, and B2, the median age was approximately 57 years and 45% of participants were ≥ 60 to ≤ 84years of age. Most participants were White (87%) and not Hispanic or Latino (95%). Baseline SARS-CoV-2 serostatus was predominantly negative (98%).

Safety reporting of solicited local and systemic reactogenicity events showed an increasing trend across all three doses of NVX-CoV2373 (Figure 2). Following the booster, participants in Group B2 reported an incidence rate for any local reaction (tenderness, pain, swelling, and erythema) of 82.5% (13.4% ≥ Grade 3) compared to 70.0% (5.2% ≥ Grade 3) following the primary vaccination series. Grade 4 local reactions were rare, with two events (pain and tenderness) reported by one participant in Group B2 compared with no participants following the primary vaccination series. Following the booster, local reactions were short-lived with a median duration of 2.0 days for all events except erythema (2.5 days). Local reactions were also short-lived following the primary vaccination series, with median durations of 2.0 days for pain and tenderness and 1.0 day for erythema and swelling.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Local and Systemic Vaccine Reactogenicity by NVX-CoV2373 Dose (Group B2)

Systemic reactions showed a similar pattern with an incidence rate for any event (fatigue, headache, muscle pain, malaise, joint pain, nausea/vomiting, and fever) of 76.5% (15.3% ≥ Grade 3), compared to 52.8% (5.6% ≥ Grade 3), following the primary vaccination series. Grade 4 systemic reactions were rare, with three events reported by one participant in Group B2 (headache, malaise, and muscle pain) compared with no participants following the primary vaccination series. Following the booster, systemic reactions were transient in nature with a median duration of 1.0 day for all events except muscle pain which had a duration of 2.0 days. All systemic reactions were also short-lived following the primary vaccination series, with a median duration of 1.0 day for all events.

Local and systemic reactogenicity events were less frequent and less severe in older adults (≥ 60 to ≤ 84 years of age) when compared to younger adults (≥ 18 to ≤ 59 years of age) following either the primary vaccination series or booster dose. In the younger cohort, post-booster local and systemic reactions were reported in 84.9% (18.9% ≥ Grade 3) and 84.9% (26.4% ≥ Grade 3) of participants, respectively, versus 79.5% (6.8% ≥ Grade 3) and 66.7% (2.2% ≥ Grade 3) of participants, respectively, in the older cohort.

Unsolicited adverse events were summarized across the active-boosted participants (Group B2), placebo-boosted participants (Group B1), and participants receiving three doses of placebo throughout the study (Group A). Through 28 days after the booster, participants who initially received active vaccine for their primary vaccination series (Groups B2 and B1) experienced a higher incidence of unsolicited adverse events than those who received only placebo (Group A), with 12.4%, 12.7%, and 11.0% of participants reporting such events, respectively. A similar trend was seen for unsolicited severe adverse events (5.7%, 3.9%, and 2.4%, respectively). Other types of AEs reported included medically attended AEs (events requiring a healthcare visit; MAAEs), PIMMCs, events relevant to COVID-19, and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Overall, MAAEs occurred with a slightly higher frequency in active boosted participants across the three groups (30.5%, 26.1%, and 23.2% for Groups B2, B1, and A, respectively), with related events reported in few participants (1.9%, 0%, and 1.2%, respectively). Events considered PIMMCs were rare across the study, with one participant in Group B2 and Group A reporting a single event each; both events were assessed as not related to study treatment. No participant reported an as adverse event related to COVID-19.

SAEs were also infrequent across the study, occurring in 5.7%, 3.3%, and 1.6% of participants in Groups B2, B1, and A, respectively, with all events assessed as not related to study treatment.

Evaluation of SAEs for Group B2 and B1 participants did not show a relationship of with active boosting, as SAEs occurred in 0%, 4.8%, and 1.0% of participants in Group B2 and 0%, 2.0%, and 2.0% of participants in Group B1 following Dose 1, Dose 2, and the booster, respectively.

As expected, declines in Group B IgG and MN₅₀ geometric mean titers (GMTs) were observed following the primary vaccination series (Day 35) through Day 189 (43,905 ELISA units [EU] to 6,064 EU for IgG and 1,470 to 63 for MN₅₀, respectively). Twenty-eight days following the booster (Day 217), IgG and MN₅₀ titers increased robustly compared to both the pre-booster titers and to the Day 35 titers produced by the primary series (Figure 3,Figure 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Serum IgG Titers to the Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Strain by Study Day (Log Scale)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4. Neutralizing Antibody Activity for the Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Strain by Study Day (Log Scale)

For the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain, serum IgG GMTs increased ∼4.7-fold from 43,905 EU following the primary vaccination series (Day 35) to 204,367 EU following the booster (Day 217). Higher fold increases after boosting were seen in older adults (5.1-fold) compared to younger adults (4.1-fold). Similarly, MN₅₀ assay GMTs specific to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain increased ∼4.1-fold from 1,470 to 6,023 over the same respective time points with increases in older and younger adults of 4.0-fold and 3.8-fold, respectively.

For the Beta variant, IgG GMTs increased from 4,317 EU at Day 189 pre-booster to 175,190 EU at Day 217 reflecting a post-booster increase of ∼40.6-fold. These titers were 4-fold higher than those observed at Day 35 for the ancestral strain (GMT 175,190 EU vs 43,905 EU). Beta variant MN₅₀ assay data showed a similar fold increase in titers from pre-booster (Day 189) to post-booster (Day 217) of ∼50.1-fold (GMT 13 vs 661), though titers were lower than those seen for the ancestral strain at Day 35 (GMT 661 vs 1,470). (Table 2, Table 3).

Two assays were developed to assess immune responses against additional SARS-CoV-2 variants using participant sera from Group B2. A functional hACE2 receptor binding inhibition assay was utilized to compare activity against the ancestral strain and the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Table 4, Figure 5). In respective order, 54.4-fold, 21.9-fold, 24.5-fold, 24.4-fold, and 20.1-fold increases in hACE2 inhibition titers were observed from Day 189 (immediately pre-booster) to Day 217. A second assay comparing anti-rS IgG activity across the same strains of SARS-CoV-2 found that 61.2-fold (Ancestral), 85.9-fold (Alpha), 65.0-fold (Beta), 92.5-fold (Delta), and 73.5-fold (Omicron) higher titers were observed after the booster (Table 5, Figure 6).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5. hACE2 Receptor Binding Inhibition Titers for SARS-CoV-2 Variants Post Primary Vaccination at Day 35 and Post-Booster at Day 217

hACE2 = human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; LOD = limit of detection; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Note: Assay methodology is fit-for-purpose.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 6. Anti-rS IgG Titers for SARS-CoV-2 Variants Post Primary Vaccination at Day 35 and Post-Booster at Day 217

Anti-rS IgG = anti-recombinant spike immunoglobulin G antibody; EC₅₀ = 50% effective concentration; LOD = limit of detection; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Note: Assay methodology is fit-for-purpose.

DISCUSSION

In this report, we describe the first available safety and immunogenicity data for a booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 in the context of an ongoing phase 2, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Administration of a single booster dose of the vaccine approximately 6 months following the primary two-dose series resulted in an incremental increase in reactogenicity events along with significantly enhanced immunogenicity.

Prior to boosting at Day 189, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in immunized participants were markedly lower when compared with samples taken after the primary vaccination series at Day 35 (Group B IgG and MN₅₀ GMTs lowered from 43,905 EU to 6,064 EU and 1,470 to 63, respectively). Correlating falling antibody titers in individuals immunized or previously exposed to COVID-19 with waning immunity can be complex, though there is established evidence that the presence of neutralizing antibodies are strongly indicative of protection against symptomatic COVID-19. Further, vaccines that generate higher neutralizing antibody titers (NVX-CoV2373, mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Sputnik V) have demonstrated higher VE in clinical trials than those associated with lower titers (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Ad26.COV2.S, and CoronaVac) (Hamady 2021, Khoury 2021).

Maintaining robust immunity may be especially important in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 variants that have shown to be a cause for breakthrough infections. Other mechanisms for maintaining long-term immunity among multiple variants may involve “vaccine mixing” with heterologous boosters or utilizing vaccine technologies that result in broadly cross-reacting immunity, as observed with an adjuvanted recombinant nanoparticle influenza vaccine (Hamady 2021, Shinde 2020).

In the present study, antibody responses to the booster were assessed for the ancestral vaccine strain as well as for more recent SARS-CoV-2 variants including Alpha, Beta, and Delta. For the ancestral strain, IgG titers at Day 217 were approximately 34-fold higher than the pre-booster Day 189 titers while neutralizing antibody titers increased approximately 96-fold after the booster. Both IgG and MN titers after the booster were > 4-fold higher than those seen after the primary two-dose series at Day 35, which is notable as the Day 35 titers corresponded to high levels of clinical efficacy in both a UK phase 3 study (89.7%) as well as in a USA/Mexico phase 3 study (90.4%) (Dunkle 2021, Heath 2021). When broken down by age group, higher fold increases were seen for older adults (≥ 60 to ≤ 84 years of age) compared to younger adults (≥ 18 to ≤ 59 years of age). This finding suggests that a booster dose may have added benefit in older adults as their antibody responses following the primary two-dose vaccination series were lower than those seen in younger adults.

For the Beta variant, 40-to 50-fold increases in IgG and MN antibody titers were seen following the booster and IgG titers were approximately 4-fold higher than those seen for the ancestral strain after the primary vaccination series. Unlike the observation with IgG, MN₅₀ GMTs for the Beta variant were lower following the booster than those for the ancestral strain following the primary vaccination series (GMT 661 vs 1,470) in alignment with the known decreased neutralizing responses for this variant. While the worldwide prevalence of Beta has recently decreased to <1% from a high of 8% in April 2021, antibody responses to this variant remain of interest due to the E484K mutation found in this variant. E484K has been found responsible for marked decreases in neutralization titers for vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent sera, and the mutation remains in the P.1, P.2, and the Mu variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Nextstrain 2021, Harvey 2021).

For the Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2, which as of December 2021 represent nearly 100% of all strains circulating, 24.4-fold (Delta) and 20.1-fold (Omicron) increases in functional hACE2 receptor binding inhibition titers were seen when comparing the post-booster titers from Day 217 to Day 189 titers (Nextstrain 2021). Anti-rS IgG activity compared at these same time points found 92.5-fold (Delta) and 73.5-fold (Omicron) higher titers associated with the booster.

These findings of significantly increased antibody titers following boosting are important as they come during a time when SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster doses are being widely considered or implemented by a number of countries in order to counteract the waning antibody titers and decreased effectiveness for approved vaccines (Hamady 2021). The continued high levels of SARS-CoV-2 circulation combined with increasing immunological pressure may also give rise to new escape variants; increasing individuals’ titers to these variants through use of a booster dose may extend protection in previously vaccinated individuals and combat the spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants.

The incidence of both local and systemic reactogenicity was higher following the 6-month booster dose compared to the previous doses reflecting the increased immunogenicity seen with the third dose. However, the incidence of Grade 3 or higher events remained relatively low with only fatigue (12.2%) being recorded by greater 10% of participants. In total, five Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) solicited local and systemic adverse events were reported. All five of these events (pain, tenderness, headache, malaise, and muscle pain) were reported by the same participant in the active booster group concurrently with an adverse event of drug hypersensitivity related to the vaccine. The drug hypersensitivity event was assessed as mild in severity. The participant did not seek any medical attention for this event, and all the participant’s symptoms resolved over a period of 6 days.

With the caveat that the data are drawn from different studies, it appears that the reactogenicity rates seen after a third dose of NVX-CoV2373 are generally similar to those seen with a booster dose of the Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna vaccines and elevated compared to the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (Flaxman 2021, Choi 2021, FDA 2021). While the incidence of unsolicited adverse events following the booster was higher in vaccine recipients (12.4%) compared to placebo recipients (11.0%), all events were classified as mild or moderate in severity. Medically attended adverse events, PIMMCs, and SAEs occurred infrequently following the booster dose and were balanced between vaccine and placebo groups.

Our study was subject to certain limitations. As these results are from an ongoing phase 2 study conducted with a limited sample size, clinical efficacy of the booster dose was not evaluated. In addition, between-strain comparisons of antibody data should be made with caution, as correlations with clinical efficacy may vary for each variant of COVID-19.

Overall, a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 administered approximately 6 months after the primary series induced a substantial increase in humoral antibodies that was > 4-fold higher than antibody titers associated with high levels of efficacy in two phase 3 studies while also displaying an acceptable safety profile. These findings support use of the vaccine in booster programs.