Abstract
Sensor-based remote monitoring could help us better track Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression, and measure patients’ response to putative disease-modifying therapeutic interventions. To be useful, the remotely-collected measurements should be valid, reliable and sensitive to change, and people with PD must engage with the technology.
We developed a smartwatch-based active assessment that enables unsupervised measurement of motor signs of PD. 388 study participants with early-stage PD (Personalized Parkinson Project, 64% men, average age 63 years) wore a smartwatch for a median of 390 days, allowing for continuous passive monitoring. Participants performed unsupervised motor tasks both in the clinic (once) and remotely (twice weekly for one year). Dropout rate was 2% at the end of follow-up. Median wear-time was 21.1 hours/day, and 59% of per-protocol remote assessments were completed.
In-clinic performance of the virtual exam verified that most participants correctly followed watch-based instructions. Analytical validation was established for in-clinic measurements, which showed moderate-to-strong correlations with consensus MDS-UPDRS Part III ratings for rest tremor (ρ=0.70), bradykinesia (ρ=-0.62), and gait (ρ=-0.46). Test-retest reliability of remote measurements, aggregated monthly, was good-to-excellent (ICC: 0.75 - 0.96). Remote measurements were sensitive to the known effects of dopaminergic medication (on vs off Cohen’s d: 0.19 - 0.54). Of note, in-clinic assessments often did not reflect the patients’ typical status at home.
This demonstrates the feasibility of using smartwatch-based unsupervised active tests, and establishes the analytical validity of associated digital measurements. Weekly measurements can create a more complete picture of patient functioning by providing a real-life distribution of disease severity, as it fluctuates over time. Sensitivity to medication-induced change, together with the improvement in test-retest reliability from temporal aggregation implies that these methods could help reduce sample sizes needed to demonstrate a response to therapeutic intervention or disease progression.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors with Verily affiliation are current Verily employees and are Verily shareholders.
Funding Statement
The study is financially supported by Verily Life Sciences LLC, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, the city of Nijmegen and the Province of Gelderland. Radboud UMC received funding for the original cohort from Health Holland (PPP allowance; public-private partnership), Radboud University Radboudumc, and Radboudumc (in kind). The other study sponsors had no role in study design and collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study is being conducted in conformance with the Good Clinical Practice ICH E6 guideline and in compliance with the Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, as defined in the Declaration of Helsinki (version amended in October 2013), the Dutch Personal Data Protection Act, and the European General Data Protection Regulation. The Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek Region Arnhem-Nijmegen approved the study protocol and communication materials. Signed informed consent is obtained before engaging a participant in any study procedure.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during this study will be made available to qualified researchers worldwide, insofar as such requests are for analysis for which the participants in the PPP have provided informed consent. Requests for access to data are governed by a Research and Data Sharing Review Committee (RDSRC), whose role is to protect subjects' privacy by limiting the availability of the study data and controlling access to sources of information that might potentially be used to identify the individual subjects associated with the biospecimen analyses. The RDSRC will assess the relevance and scientific quality of research proposals for which study data or material is requested.
Abbreviations
- ICC
- Intra-class correlation
- MDS-UPDRS
- Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale
- PD-VME
- Parkinson’s Disease Virtual Motor Exam
- PPP
- Personalized Parkinson’s Project
