Abstract
Study Objectives Validate a HR-based deep-learning algorithm for sleep staging named Neurobit-HRV (Neurobit Inc., New York, USA).
Methods The algorithm can perform classification at 2-levels (Wake; Sleep), 3-levels (Wake; NREM; REM) or 4-levels (Wake; Light; Deep; REM) in 30-second epochs. The algorithm was validated using an open-source dataset of PSG recordings (Physionet CinC dataset, n=994 participants) and a proprietary dataset (Z3Pulse, n=52 participants), composed of HR recordings collected with a chest-worn, wireless sensor. A simultaneous PSG was collected using SOMNOtouch. We evaluated the performance of the models in both datasets using Accuracy (A), Cohen’s kappa (K), Sensitivity (SE), Specificity (SP).
Results CinC - The highest value of accuracy was achieved by the 2-levels model (0.8797), while the 3-levels model obtained the best value of K (0.6025). The 4-levels model obtained the lowest SE (0.3812) and the highest SP (0.9744) for the classification of Deep sleep segments. AHI and biological sex did not affect sleep scoring, while a significant decrease of performance by age was reported across the models. Z3Pulse - The highest value of accuracy was achieved by the 2-levels model (0.8812), whereas the 3-levels model obtained the best value of K (0.611). For classification of the sleep states, the lowest SE (0.6163) and the highest SP (0.9606) were obtained for the classification of Deep sleep segment.
Conclusions Results demonstrate the feasibility of accurate HR-based sleep staging. The combination of the illustrated sleep staging algorithm with an inexpensive HR device, provides a cost-effective and non-invasive solution easily deployable in the home.
Competing Interest Statement
Financial Disclosure: None Non-Financial Disclosure: Amiya Patanaik and Kishan are shareholders in Neurobit, Inc.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the Health Technology Consortium grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All participants provided written informed consent in compliance with a protocol approved by the National University of Singapore's Institutional Review Board (NUS-IRB) and were paid for their involvement.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The dataset You Snooze You Win - The PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2018 is available online at https://physionet.org/content/challenge-2018/1.0.0/. The dataset Z3Pulse is available upon reasonable request to the authors, subject to review by an ethics committee.
