Abstract
The Omicron Variant of concern (B.1.1.529) has spread internationally and is raising serious concerns about the reduced vaccine efficacy and the increased risk of reinfection. Here we assessed the serum neutralizing activity using a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay in 292 healthcare workers who had administered a third homologous boosting vaccination 8 to 9 months after completion of the priming two-dose inactivated vaccination to investigate whether the newly identified Omicron variant could escape serum antibody neutralization elicited by the booster vaccination. The third booster dose with BBIBP-CorV lead to a significant rebound in neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2, and the neutralization GMT on day 28 after the third booster dose was 6.1 times higher than the GMT on day 28 after the second dose. The Omicron variant did cause significantly lower neutralization sensitivity compared to the wild-type strain of the booster elicited serum, with about 20.1-fold reduction. Our study demonstrated that a third booster dose of BBIBP-CorV lead to a significant rebound in neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2, while the Omicron variant showed extensive but incomplete escape of the booster elicited neutralization.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases (20dz2261100), and a grant from Science and Technology Commission Shanghai Municipality (No. 20JC1410200).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital gave ethical approval for this work (RJHKY2021-321)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
