Abstract
Introduction Determining the long-term impact of telemedicine in care across the diagnostic and age spectrum of child neurology during the COVID-19 pandemic and with the re-opening of outpatient clinics.
Methods An observational cohort study of 34,837 in-person visits and 14,820 telemedicine outpatient pediatric neurology visits between October 1, 2019 and April 9, 2021. We assessed differences in care across visit types, time-period observed, time between follow-ups, patient portal activation rates and demographic factors.
Results 26,399 patients were observed in this study (median age 11.4 years [interquartile range, 5.5-15.9]; 13,209 male). We observed a higher proportion of telemedicine for epilepsy (ICD10 G40: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5) and a lower proportion for movement disorders (ICD10 G25: OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8; ICD10 R25: OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). Infants were more likely to be seen in-person after re-opening clinics than by telemedicine (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5-1.8) as were individuals with neuromuscular disorders (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6-0.7). Racial and ethnic minority populations and those with highest social vulnerability had lower rates of telemedicine participation throughout the pandemic (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.8-0.8; OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.7-0.8).
Discussion Telemedicine implementation was followed by continued use even once in-person clinics were available. Pediatric epilepsy care can often be performed using telemedicine while young children and patients with neuromuscular disorders often require in-person assessment. Prominent barriers for socially vulnerable families and racial and ethnic minorities persist.
Competing Interest Statement
I.H. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Biogen. N.S.A. has research funding from the Wolfson Foundation, PCORI, UCB Pharma, serves as a consultant to the Epilepsy Foundation, and receives royalties from Demos Publishing. C.L.S has received grant support from Pfizer, Miles for Migraine, FDA [grant number 1U18FD006298], and NIH NINDS [grant number K23 NS102521]. C.L.S or her institution have received compensation for her consulting work for Allergan, Teva, Lundbeck, Impel, Eli Lilly, and Upsher Smith. No other author has any conflicts of interest to disclose. An ICMJE uniform disclosure form has been completed and attached as a supplementary file with additional details.
Funding Statement
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: I.H. was supported by The Hartwell Foundation through an Individual Biomedical Research Award; the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke [grant number K02 NS112600]; the Center Without Walls on ion channel function in epilepsy Channelopathy-associated Research Center [grant number U54 NS108874]; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania [grant number U54 HD086984]; intramural funds of the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia through the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN); the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health through the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (ITMAT) Transdisciplinary Program in Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania [grant number UL1TR001878]. C.L.S is supported by NINDS [grant number K23 NS102521].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
the IRB of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia waived ethical approval for this work as it was completed retrospectively and met the board's exemption criteria.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data in a de-identified format will be made available by reasonable request to the corresponding author.