Abstract
Background Rapid Response Teams were developed to provide interventions for deteriorating patients. Their activation depends on timely detection of deterioration. Automated calculation of warning signs may lead to early recognition, and improvement of RRT effectiveness.
Method This was a “Before” and “After” study, in the “Before” period ward nurses activated RRT after manually recording vital signs and calculating warning scores. In the “After” period, vital signs and warning calculations were automatically relayed to RRT through a wireless monitoring network.
Results The “After” group had significantly lower incidence and rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared to the “Before” group (2.3 / 1000 inpatient days versus 3.8 / 1000 inpatient days respectively, p = 0.01), the “Before” group had a significantly higher hospital length of stay, and significantly fewer visits by the RRT. In multivariable logistic regression model, being in the “After” group decreases odds of CPR by 30% (OR = 0.7 [95% CI: 0.44 – 0.97]; p = 0.02). There was no difference between groups in unplanned ICU admission or readmission.
Conclusion Automated activation of the RRT resulted in significant reduction of CPR events and rate, reduction of hospital length of stay, and increase in the number of visits by the RRT. There was no difference in unplanned ICU admission or readmission.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia gave ethical approval for this work under reference number: H1RI - 07-JAN-20-02 IRB registration number with KACST: H-01-R-053 IRB registration number US department of HHS IORG: IORG0010374 email: irb@ksmc.med.sa
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The flow diagram (figure 1) had a mistake in the numbers of patients. The revision is to update the numbers of patient in the flow diagram.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
