Abstract
Vaccination is considered the most important measure to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Extensive follow-up studies with distinct vaccines and populations are able to promote robust and reliable data to better understand the effectiveness of this pharmacologic strategy. In this sense, we present data regarding binding and neutralizing antibodies throughout time, from vaccinated and previously infected (PI) health care workers (HCW) in Portugal. We analyzed serum samples of 132 HCW, vaccinated and with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Samples were collected before vaccination (baseline, M1), at second dose vaccine uptake (M2), and 25-70 days (M3) and 150-210 days (M4) after the second dose for vaccinated individuals. The IgG (anti-RBD/S) antibody geometric mean titer found on vaccinated HCW at M2 (814.7 AU/ml; 95% CI 649.8-1021.5) were significantly higher than those found on PI HCW at recruitment (M1) (252.6 AU/ml; 95% CI 108.7 - 587.1), and the neutralizing antibodies (nAb) were similar between these groups, 93.2 UI/ml (95% CI 73.2-118.5) vs. 84.1 UI/ml (95% CI 40.4-155.9), respectively. We detected about 10-fold higher IgG (anti-RBD/S) antibodies titers in M3 when compared with M2, with a slightly but significant decrease in titers from 36 days after the second dose vaccine uptake. The increase of nAb titers were correlated with IgG (anti-RBD/S) antibodies titers, however, contrasting to IgG (anti-RBD/S) antibodies titers, we did not detect a decrease in nAb titer from 36 days after a second vaccine dose uptake. At M4, was observed a decrease of 8-fold in binding IgG (anti-RBD/S) and nAb. No significant differences in antibody titers were observed by sex, age or chronic diseases. Our results suggest that IgG (anti-RBD/S) antibodies titers and nAb titers could be correlated, but ongoing follow up of the cohort, is required to better understand this correlation, and the duration of the immune response.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the National Institute of Health Doctor Ricardo Jorge Health Ethics Committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
