Abstract
Background Canadians with disabilities make up nearly a quarter of the population yet face barriers in accessing information about COVID-19 testing accessibility across the country.
Objective No known studies evaluate the online information about the accessibility of COVID-19 testing locations. This study aimed to understand the accessibility of COVID-19 testing sites in Canada based on online information in March 2021.
Methods Key accessibility features were identified to evaluate COVID-19 testing websites information on accessibility and data were extracted from the website to simulate the user experience of booking a COVID-19 test.
Results All provinces and territories provided minimal accessibility information on their COVID-19 testing websites, except for Ontario. Out of 170 testing locations in Ontario, few had information about accessibility, with only 8.2% listing at least 3 of the 5 key accessibility features measured on their websites.
Conclusions This paper demonstrates that more than a year into the pandemic, there existed a clear lack of accessibility information for Canadian testing locations for people with disabilities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SR and MBD receive funding from the Rhodes Trust. All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding and Conflicts: SR and MBD receive funding from the Rhodes Trust. All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at the provincial public health websites.
