Abstract
Positive parent infant relationships are key to achieving long term child outcomes. Identifying parents who may need support is difficult because of a lack of robust assessment tools. Working in partnership with health services we piloted the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (MPAS) in a deprived, multi-ethnic urban community in Bradford, UK.
The pilot aimed to assess the clinical utility of MPAS to identify need for support: Was it administered to a representative group of women? Is MPAS valid for this population?
Data were linked to a cohort study in the pilot area (Born in Bradford’s Better Start - BiBBS). Chi Square tests assessed sample representativeness (age, ethnicity, parity, English language, education, deprivation). Exploratory factor analysis explored MPAS’ validity.
563 women in BiBBS were eligible, 210 (37%) completed MPAS. No differences were found between completers and non-completers, suggestive of a representative sample. In total, 336 women completed MPAS in the pilot. MPAS had ceiling effects and a satisfactory factor structure could not be identified, indicating poor psychometric properties
Health visitors were successful in administering MPAS to a representative sample, but poor psychometric robustness indicates that MPAS is unsuitable for routine use in this setting. A gap for such a measure remains.
Statement of relevance to practitioners This research shows that:
Health practitioners working in universal early years services were willing and able to integrate structured assessments of parent-infant relationship into their routine practice
There is no evidence that health professionals were less likely to offer traditionally considered ‘hard to reach’ families an assessment of their parent-infant relationship
The Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale did not demonstrate psychometric robustness when delivered in routine, universal, health visiting services in Bradford as part of an initial assessment of parent-infant relationship, and therefore cannot be recommended for continued routine use.
Statement of relevance to the field This pilot study explores a significant gap in the field, namely how universal services can assess parent-infant relationship to facilitate timely signposting to appropriate services, in a preventative model, to those families that may benefit. This study contributes to the evidence base by assessing if health professionals working in a universal service can offer an assessment to a representative group of families, including families who may be considered hard to reach as well as providing psychometric evidence on the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale. We did not find good evidence for the psychometric properties of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale when used in this way in Bradford. We found that health professionals offered the assessment to a representative sample of families, including those who may be at an enhanced risk of health inequalities because of their ethnicity, age, education, and wider socioeconomic circumstances.
This evidence is important for measure/tool selection for community studies. The findings also emphasise that practitioners can integrate tools for assessment in their practice, including with families who are at an increased risk of experiencing inequalities.
Diversity and anti-racist scholarship This study was designed and executed in a very diverse community with approximately 60% of the population identifying as Asian/Asian British: Pakistani, and 10% of the population identifying as White: British and the remaining population identifying with a wide range of ethnicities. The health visiting service deliberately engages with the whole population in a culturally sensitive way, including ensuring staff speak key community languages and using translators as required. We included specific tests of representativeness as part of the study design and found that participants in the study were representative of the wider community in terms of ethnicity and English language comprehension.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study has received funding through a peer review process from the National Lottery Community Fund as part of the A Better Start programme. The funders have not had any involvement in the design or writing of the paper. Authors PKB, AD, JD and TB were supported by the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber (www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk). JD and TB were supported by the NIHR ARC Yorkshire and Humber (https://www.arc-yh.nihr.ac.uk/).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Health Research Authority confirmed that the pilot of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale is considered to be service evaluation, not research, and as such does not require review by an NHS Research Ethics Committee (HRA decision 60/88/81). The Born in Bradfords Better Start study used for some comparative analysis received ethical approval by Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (15/YH/0455), and research governance approval from Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. All data were anonymised prior to analysis and are stored securely at the Bradford NHS Teaching Hospital.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Note: Philippa Bird’s current affiliation is Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK; Joanna Howes’ current affiliation is Bradford Metropolitan District Council, Bradford, UK
Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflict of interest
Ethics: The Health Research Authority confirmed that the pilot of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale is considered to be service evaluation, not research, and as such does not require review by an NHS Research Ethics Committee (HRA decision 60/88/81). The Born in Bradford’s Better Start study used for some comparative analysis received ethical approval by Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (15/YH/0455), and research governance approval from Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. All data were anonymised prior to analysis and are stored securely at the Bradford NHS Teaching Hospital.
Data availability: Data is stored securely by Born in Bradford at the Bradford Institute for Health Research (BIHR). Data sharing is not applicable to this article. However, please note that data and samples collected throughout the course of the BiBBS cohort will be available to external researchers and proposals for collaboration will be welcomed. Information on how to access the data can be found at: www.borninbradford.nhs.uk.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.