Abstract
Objective Breast cancer is currently the most common malignant disease in Thailand. The present study aims to evaluate the most beneficial method of breast cancer screening in different breast densities by analyzing the benefits of screening mammography with additional breast ultrasonography classified by breast density.
Method 49 middle-aged and elderly Bangkokian women who had undergone both mammography and ultrasonography were picked at random for analysis. BI-RADS scores were assigned based on mammography results alone and based on combined mammography and ultrasonography results. Concordance/discordance rates between the 2 radiographic techniques were compared in women stratified based on their breast densities.
Results All of our participants were given a score between BIRADS 1 and 3, while over 40% of participants are in the BIRADS 2 category. 60% of subjects with extremely dense breasts benefit from screening mammography with additional breast ultrasonography, while only 50% of samples with heterogeneous density and 34.21% samples with heterogeneous fibroglandular breasts benefit from the extra intervention.
Conclusion Our study concludes that women with higher breast density are more likely to benefit from screening using ultrasonography in addition to mammography as opposed to mammography screening alone. We recommend both mammography and ultrasonography for initial breast cancer screening. For follow-up visits, we suggest the screening method in accordance with breast density, using ultrasonography alone for women with high breast densities and mammography for women with heterogeneously dense breasts.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data were obtained from the general population who had consented to the mammography and ultrasonographic interventions. Data were collected using an anonymous case report form, without any means of exposing participants personal information. IRB were not deemed necessary by the Chulalongkorn Ethical Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos