Abstract
Both sex and gender are characteristics that play a key role in risk and resilience in health and well-being. Current research lacks the ability to quantitatively describe gender and gender diversity and is limited to endorsement of categorical gender identities, which are contextually and culturally dependent. A multidimensional data-driven approach to characterizing gender diversity will enable researchers to advance the health of gender-diverse people by better understanding how genetic factors interact to determine health outcomes. In N = 450 independent adults with or without autism in the SPARK cohort, we used the Gender Self-Report (GSR), a self-report tool that psychometrically captures two quantitative dimensions of gender diversity: Binary, the extent to which one identifies with the binary gender opposite that of their sex at birth, and Nonbinary gender diversity, the extent to which one identifies with a neutral gender and/or both binary genders. We correlated the two GSR scores with two mental health outcomes and 20 human behavior polygenic scores in a subset of N = 450 participants. Same-sex sexual behavior polygenic scores were positively correlated with Binary (ρ = 0.12, p < 0.05) and Nonbinary (ρ = 0.11, p < 0.05). Interestingly, cognitive performance polygenic scores were also correlated with Binary (ρ = 0.09, p = 0.07) and Nonbinary (ρ = 0.13, p < 0.05). In agreement with this, an association was also observed in a larger SPARK sample (N = 3,466, with less granular gender identity data), in which the sex/gender discordant group had higher mean polygenic scores for educational attainment (p < 0.05). Binary and Nonbinary were positively correlated with poorer mental health, and accounting for genetic effects had minimal impact on these associations. However, when stratifying individuals by polygenic scores quartiles, we observed dramatic differences in genetic risk and resilience, with individuals in the high risk quartile for schizophrenia and bipolar polygenic risk having strong positive correlations of gender diversity with mental health, whereas the lower quartile had no significant associations. Overall, our results suggest (1) cognitive ability and gender diversity share overlapping genetic factors, (2) greater gender diversity is correlated with poorer mental health outcomes and this effect is not directly explained by neuropsychiatric polygenic risk, but rather an interaction effect, and (3) quantitatively measuring gender diversity facilitates a better understanding of the role of gender in health outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (MH105527 and DC014489 to JM) and the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100028 to JS), as well as grants from the Simons Foundation (SFARI 516716 to JM), the Clinical and Translational Science Award (KL2TR001877 to JM), the Fahs-Beck Fellow Grant to JS, and the National Institutes of Health Predoctoral training grant (T32GM008629 to TT). This work was supported by the University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (Hawk-IDDRC) through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD103556).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of the University of Iowa gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* jacob-michaelson{at}uiowa.edu
Mental health outcomes analyses included now.
Data Availability
The SPARK genetic data can be obtained at SFARI Base. The SPARK Research Match data will be available to qualified, approved researchers through SFARI Base upon publication of this article.
