Abstract
Aim To explore whether children in specialist care with COVID-19 have increased post-discharge health care use when compared to children in specialist care with 1) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, and 2) other respiratory tract infections (RTIs).
Methods In 34,214 children aged 1 month to 5 years who were registered with one or more hospital visit (outpatient or inpatient) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 (N=128), RSV infection (N=4,009), or other RTIs (N=34,458) from 2017-2021, we used a difference-in-differences study design to investigate the individual all-cause primary and specialist health care use from 12 weeks prior to 12 weeks after the hospital visit, stratified on infants (1-12 months) and children (1-5 years).
Results We found a slight increase in primary health care use in the first four weeks after the hospital visit for infants with COVID-19 when compared to infants with RSV infection (6 [95%CI=2 to 13] per 10,000, 0.52% relative increase). For infants diagnosed with COVID-19, we found a similar post-visit increase in inpatients when compared to infants with RSV infection, which lasted for 12 weeks.
Conclusions Our findings imply slightly increased health care use among infants after hospital visit for COVID-19 than among infants with other respiratory tract infections, for which potential etiological mechanisms deserve future clinical research. Severe COVID-19 in young children will not represent any markedly increased burden on the health services.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was internally funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The establishment of an emergency preparedness register forms part of the legally mandated responsibilities of The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) during epidemics. Institutional board review was conducted, and The Ethics Committee of South-East Norway confirmed (June 4th, 2020, #153204) that external ethical board review was not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
1
Blogs/Media
Author Videos