Covid-19 Pandemic and its Effect on Residents’ Mental Well-Being

Introduction

The Covid-19 pandemic evolved from an immediate health emergency to a systemic problem that had far-reaching consequences in people’s lives. Because of its progression from a health scare to a global economic and social disaster, the effects of Covid-19 have been unparalleled (Conceição et al., 2020).

Past investigations of the effects of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and Ebola epidemics on suffering individuals and healthcare workers revealed a significant neuropsychiatric connection (Shah et al., 2020). Covid-19’s effects on people’s mental health and well-being were being explored more and more (Torales et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020). Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a considerable body of research has shown that resident physicians experience burnout, depression, and anxiety while in training (Raj, 2016). As a result, the possibility of a reduction in their well-being due to the COVID-19 pandemic is very plausible.

Kuwait’s national healthcare system, like that of many other countries, was also strained during the COVID-19 epidemic (Armocida et al., 2020). Even in high-income countries with well-resourced health care systems, overburdened healthcare services confronted considerable operational and logistical issues. As a result, many healthcare staff have been deployed due to the pandemic response (Coughlan et al., 2020). Many junior doctors, despite their specializations, were associated with the management of COVID-19 patients in a variety of setups such as quarantine areas, swabbing areas, emergency departments, COVID-19 wards, and ICUs, starting from February 24^th (when the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in Kuwait) to the end of September 2020. These kinds of scenarios were also documented in a number of other nations. Junior doctor rotations were reported to be discontinued in the United Kingdom (UK), and many doctors were redeployed to operate in intensive care units (Salem et al., 2020). The specific approach to tackle the epidemic incorporates a number of interconnected ideas, and multiple studies have found that capability outcomes are closely linked to mental health and social consequences (Brunner, 2017). Despite the growing number of studies looking into the influence of COVID-19 on mental health and well-being, data on the pandemic’s broader potential impact is still lacking. Hence, this study aimed to recognize the participation of junior doctors in Kuwait in the COVID-19 pandemic and note their ability to deal with the tragedy and its impact on their mental health and professional training.

The major objective of the present study includes describing the effect of working during the pandemic on the mental well-being of junior doctors in Kuwait as well as to study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training and professional performance of the junior doctors in Kuwait.

Method

A cross-sectional online survey was created to assess mental and physical health as a result of COVID-19 exposure. The Google Forms platform was used to conduct this survey from 1^st May to 30^th May 2021. Health-care workers who were currently enrolled in a residency program at the Kuwait Institutional of Medical Specialization (KIMS) were eligible to participate in this study. The study was authorized by Kuwait’s Ministry of Health’s Ethical Research Committee. The participants gave their consent to participate in the survey by filling the questionnaire.

Each residency program’s director, chief residents, and head of medical departments received the questionnaire by email or WhatsApp. The participants were then requested to forward the survey invitation to other junior doctors, with a two-week follow-up reminder. Limited response to one individual was enabled in the Google forms to avoid multiple submissions from the same participant. The information gathered was automatically placed into a spreadsheet.

Result

Discussion

Our study indicated that various factors were independently associated with the mental state of residents. Gender, option to choose to work with COVID-19 patients, weekly working hours, training affected by the pandemic, lost on training service time were the factors associated with anxiety scores. While age, option to choose to work with COVID-19 patient, weekly working hours, working during the pandemic affected your study schedule, lost on and off service training time, support from your senior/supervisor/mentor, supervised training on personal protective equipment were associated with depression scores. The stress scores were associated with factors such as age, gender, option to choose to work with COVID-19 patient, weekly working hours, training, working during the pandemic affected your study schedule, support from your senior/supervisor/mentor, supervised training on personal protective equipment.

The median stress and anxiety scores were significantly higher in females as compared to males. The observed results are consistent with previous studies, such as the one done by Lai and co-workers (Lai et al., 2020). It is hypothesized that females experience higher stress than males because their stress responses are varied. Women have a hormonal system that is radically different from males, causing them to behave more emotionally. These distinctions between men and women occur during the reproductive years and gradually fade after menopause. Furthermore, they are confronted with more stressors since they are required to perform multiple roles in their daily activities (Verma et al., 2011).

In addition, the present study revealed that median scores of stress and depression were significantly higher among those aged 25-29 years and 29-33 years as compared to those aged 33-37 years. This could be related to the fact that most mental health problems begin in early adulthood, but young adults rarely receive mental health support. Furthermore, mental health problems are linked to a higher frequency of physical and emotional disorders in the medium to long term, marginalization, poor sleep quality, and dysfunctional interactions in the said population (Ramón-Arbués et al., 2020).

In our study, there was a strong association between longer working hours and higher DASS-21 score results. Long work hours have been linked to psychological and occupational stress in some research studies (Hsu et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2017). In addition, long working hours have been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic fatigue, depressive state, anxiety, and self-perceived health, mental health status, hypertension, and health behavior (Liu et al., 2002; Artazcoz et al., 2009).

Varying types of job conditions are assumed to have different psychological effects due to disparities in the working environment, work intensity, burden, and disease risk. The major finding of the current study is that there is a clear link between high and extended work hours with the precipitation of depression, anxiety, and stress in healthcare workers during the pandemic era. The findings are consistent with the one reported by other researchers (Sasangohar et al. 2020; Lai et al. 2020). Because of the increased demand for healthcare services during the COVID-19 epidemic, many healthcare workers were forced to work harder, longer, or on more irregular schedules than they were used to do prior to the pandemic (WHO, 2020b). Longer working schedules in the assigned shifts, heavy workload and other psychosocial risks can lead to exhaustion, occupational burnout, elevated psychological discomfort, and negative mental health consequences (WHO, 2020b; Sasangohar et al., 2020). While it has been observed that professionals working in the intensive care unit in the battle against the pandemic are emotionally exhausted (Ruiz-Fernández et al., 2020). Teng et al. (2020) found that depression, anxiety, and fatigue are all frequent among frontline health workers.

A lack of supervised training on PPE, an insecure work environment, and poor working circumstances may lead to an elevated perception of risk to oneself and concern of transference to their family. This could lead to a significant decline of a drive as well as unpleasant emotions like despair and guilt. As a result, organizations need to ensure guaranteeing the safety of HCWs and addressing their basic requirements as a top priority. It’s also been discovered that peer support and supervisory assistance are linked to psychological well-being. The ability to converse to someone about their feelings or experiences, discuss the emotional and physical circumstances they face at work, and share their worries with other co-workers can all contribute to alleviatingfeelings of isolation and stress. Doctors on the job should be motivated to interact with one another, and if necessary, support groups should be accessible via social networks. Additionally, individual psychological load appears to be linked to sentiments of occupational expertise during COVID-19-related duties. Providing appropriate pre-job training for those who will take a job on the front lines, outlining precise and reliable information about the disease, the threat of contagion, and ability to treat oneself, as well as instituting systematic diagnostic and treatment procedures with specific guidelines, can enable alleviate stress and boost occupational esteem [Elbay et al., 2020]. Peer support programs have been shown to improve junior doctors’ psychological well-being and minimize the likelihood of burnout among clinicians (Chanchlani et al., 2018). A thriving trainee doctor peer support group will presumably foster a sense of connectedness and teamwork, as well as give substance to experiences, reducing burnout and improving patient care in the long run (West et al., 2018).

Real-life clinical situations, simulation, academic lectures, small group sessions, journal clubs, and teaching sessions are all used in the education program of the residents. However, the COVID-19 pandemic, on the other hand, has hampered the routine teaching and learning schedules of the residents. Considering medical education is so crucial to residents’ advancement in their careers, any disruption or alteration in their learning might have a negative impact on their success. During this time, online learning seemed to be the cornerstone of the learning process, since it could convey information while avoiding social contact, which could aid in virus spread. Many residents believe that their study routine was disrupted during the epidemic; this adjustment has been linked to increased levels of stress and depression in students, according to these research studies (Seifman et al., 2020).

Responders who perceived the pandemic had impacted their training and study schedule, who had lost service time, and who did not have the option to select whether or not to work with COVID-19 patients, or who were pushed to, had considerably higher stress levels. Internal medicine, emergency medicine, and family medicine residents were rerouted to higher-need areas. Some essential rotations, such as pediatrics and anesthesia, were canceled entirely in order for these redeployments to take place. In addition, due to a transition to digital care and efforts to curb resident exposure, chances to learn and enhance technical knowledge came to a standstill. This is in line with the findings of a reported study, which found that junior residents were more likely to possess more severe mental health consequences like depression, anxiety, insomnia, and discomfort (Lai et al., 2020). Lack of experience, insufficient preparation, or lack of training could all be plausible reasons for the observed effects. Healthcare executives hence need to create and implement support initiatives that are based on the needs and wishes of healthcare professionals. Peer counseling with connectivity to a therapist, therapy sessions and counseling, and an online clinician support group, for example, received the most interest in a survey (Shechter et al., 2020).

It is vital to assess the impact of limits in face-to-face work supervision, as well as the merits and implications of giving training through alternative methods such as online platforms and their possible permanent integration into the curriculum. Similarly, in light of trainee concerns about their capacity to meet specific training needs and pass competency assessments, competence definitions and curricula need to be re-evaluated (Seifman et al., 2021).

Conclusion

A pandemic necessitates swift organizational and healthcare personnel adaptability. It is therefore vital for organizations to consider factors that are independently associated with depression, anxiety, and stress which needs to be taken into consideration to protect the Residents’ Mental Well-being.

Supportive programs need to be envisaged for health professionals who are engaged in an adverse event. Organizations need to exploit the pandemic as a platform to devise focused initiatives to reduce significant stressors that affect healthcare employees’ mental well-being under normal conditions. The downturn has taken a tremendous toll on healthcare professionals.

Those in roles of institutional or sector leadership should seize this advantage to implement targeted initiatives to alleviate critical stressors that affect the mental health of healthcare professionals.