Abstract
Objective This systematic review aimed to assess methods used to relate repeated mammographic images to breast cancer risk, including the time from mammogram to diagnosis of breast cancer, and methods for analysis of data from either one or both breasts (averaged or assessed individually).
Design A systematic review was performed.
Setting The databases including Medline (Ovid) 1946-, Embase.com 1947-, CINAHL Plus 1937-, Scopus 1823-, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through October 2021 to extract published articles in English describing the relationship of change in mammographic features with risk of breast cancer.
Participants Women with mammogram images.
Main outcome measure Breast cancer incidence.
Results Twenty articles were included in the final review. We found that BIRADs and Cumulus were most commonly used for classifying mammographic density and automated assessment was used on more recent digital mammograms. Time between mammograms varied from 1 to median of 4.1 years, and only 9 of the studies used more than 2 mammograms to quantify features. One study used a prediction horizon of 5 and 10 years, one used 5 years only and another 10 years only, while in the others the prediction horizon was not clearly defined with investigators using the next screening mammogram.
Conclusion This review provided an updated overview of the state of the art and revealed research gaps; based on these, we provide recommendations for future studies using repeated measure methods for mammogram images to make the use of accumulating image data. By following these recommendations, we expect to improve risk classification and risk prediction for women to tailor screening and prevention strategies to level of risk.
Strengths and limitations of the study
To the best of our knowledge, this is the most recent systematic review on the topic of using multiple mammogram images to define risk of breast cancer.
This review was performed strictly following systematic review guidelines including a medical librarian with expertise in searching, multiple independent reviewers involved in study selection and data extraction, and reporting following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Due to heterogeneity of methods for assessment and classification (categorical and continuous) of mammographic features including breast density and time to breast cancer, we did not perform risk of bias or conduct a meta-analysis.
Few studies looked at repeated measures of non-density features.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation grant number (BCRF 21-028).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding statement This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation grant number (BCRF 21-028).
Competing interests The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Typographical and editing erors were corrected. Consistency in numbers between tables and text corrected for longest duration beteween mammograms included in the individual studies, corrected to a median of 4.1 year. Largest and smallest number of cases in individual studies also corrected.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
