Is modular control related to functional outcomes in individuals with knee osteoarthritis and following total knee arthroplasty?

Rebekah R. Koehn; Sarah A. Roelker; Xueliang Pan; Laura C. Schmitt; Ajit M.W. Chaudhari; Robert A. Siston

doi:10.1101/2021.11.04.21265894

Abstract

Background Individuals who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for treatment of knee osteoarthritis often experience suboptimal outcomes. Investigation of neuromuscular control strategies in these individuals may reveal factors that contribute to these functional deficits. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the relationship between patient function and modular control during gait before and after TKA.

Methods Electromyography data from 36 participants (38 knees) were collected from 8 lower extremity muscles on the TKA-involved limb during ≥5 over-ground walking trials before (n=30), 6-months after (n=26), and 24-months after (n=13) surgery. Muscle modules were estimated using non-negative matrix factorization. The number of modules was determined from 500 resampled trials.

Results A higher number of modules was related to better performance-based and patient-reported function before and 6-months after surgery. Participants with organization similar to healthy, age-matched controls trended toward better function 24-months after surgery, though these results were not statistically significant. We also observed plasticity in the participants’ modular control strategies, with 100% of participants who were present before and 24-months after surgery (10/10) demonstrating changes in the number of modules and/or organization of at least 1 module.

Conclusions This pilot work suggests that functional improvements following TKA may initially present as increases in the number of modules recruited during gait. Subsequent improvements in function may present as improved module organization.

Noteworthy This work is the first to characterize motor modules in TKA both before and after surgery and to demonstrate changes in the number and organization of modules over the time course of recovery, which may be related to changes in patient function. The plasticity of modular control following TKA is a key finding which has not been previously documented and may be useful in predicting or improving surgical outcomes through novel rehabilitation protocols.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant Nos. DGE-1343012 (SAR) and DGE-0822215 (EJC), a fellowship from The Ohio State University (RRK), and by Grant Number R01AR056700 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases nor the National Institutes of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The IRB of The Ohio State University gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

Funding statement: This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (https://www.nsfgrfp.org/) under Grant Nos. DGE-1343012 (SAR) and DGE-0822215 (EJC), a fellowship from The Ohio State University (RRK; https://gradsch.osu.edu/fellowships), and by Grant Number R01AR056700 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (https://www-niams-nih-gov.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases nor the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement: None of the authors have conflicts of interest regarding the contents of this manuscript.
Data availability statement: Data are available on Figshare.
Demographics data for all participants (.csv) and raw EMG, marker, and force plate data (.mat) for the participants before and after total knee arthroplasty are available at: https://figshare.com/projects/Is_modular_control_related_to_functional_outcomes_in_individuals_with_knee_osteoarthritis_and_following_total_knee_arthroplasty_/132959
Raw EMG, marker, and force plate data (.mat) for the healthy participants are available at: https://figshare.com/projects/Modular_Control_of_Walking_in_Unimpaired_Younger_and_Older_Adults_and_Individuals_with_Knee_Osteoarthritis/128774
We have provided additional background on modular control research in orthopaedic populations, more thoroughly explained our electromyography data collection methodology and participant inclusion, and clarified definitions of "clinically meaningful improvements in function" and measures of modular control organization (Wmusc and Wsum).