Summary
Background The evidence on mental well-being and loneliness among young people during the initial lockdown is mixed, and little is known about the long-lasting impact of the sequential lockdowns. We examine changes in young people’s mental health from before to during the initial and second more prolonged lockdown, and whether women and those with pre-existing depressive symptoms were disproportionally impacted.
Methods Participants reported on mental health indicators in an ongoing 18-year data collection in the Danish National Birth Cohort and in a COVID-19 survey, including 8 data points: 7 in the initial lockdown, and 1 year post. Changes in quality of life (QoL), mental well-being, and loneliness were estimated with random effect linear regressions on longitudinal data (N=32,985), and linear regressions on repeated cross-sections (N=28,579).
Findings Interim deterioration in mental well-being and loneliness was observed during the initial lockdown, and only in those without pre-existing depressive symptoms. During the second lockdown, a modest deterioration was again observed for mental well-being and loneliness. QoL likewise only declined among those without pre-existing symptoms, where women showed a greater decline than men. QoL did not normalise during the initial lockdown and remained at lower levels during the second lockdown. These findings were not replicated in the repeated cross-sections.
Interpretation Except for an interim decrease in mental health during lockdown, and only in those without pre-existing depressive symptoms, this study’s findings do not suggest a substantial detrimental impact of the lockdowns. Potential methodological differences in-between studies are a possible explanation for the mixed evidence.
Funding The Velux Foundation
Evidence before this study We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, MedrXiv, and PsyArXiv with the terms (“Mental*” OR “Psychological*” OR “Emotional*”) AND (“Youth” OR “Young Adult*”) AND (“COVID*” OR “Coronavirus” OR “Lockdown*”) for articles published in English between January 1st 2020 and October 1st 2021. Included studies varied in terms of quality of data used but overall studies reported a detrimental impact of the lockdowns on young people’s mental health. However, the evidence on mental well-being and loneliness has shown to be inconsistent and with signs of resilience. Young people, women, and those with a pre-existing mental disorder have been identified as vulnerable subgroups, but only a few studies investigating mental health in individuals with a pre-existing mental disorder included a pre-lockdown measurement. The included studies also demonstrated that there is a gap in the evidence in understanding how mental health changed week by week, as well as the long-term impact over the course of the lockdowns.
Added value of this study With longitudinal data, this study shows an interim impact of the initial and second lockdown on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in young individuals without pre-existing symptoms in Denmark. Since commencement of the initial lockdown, the levels of mental health returned to before levels, but one year after the initial lockdown, the levels were still lower than before lockdown in young people without pre-existing depressive symptoms. Young individuals with pre-existing depressive symptoms did not experience more detrimental impact of the lockdown, but rather indication of resilience or even improvements in mental health were observed. A disproportional impact of the lockdown on women compared to men was only observed for QoL, as women without pre-exiting depressive symptoms experienced a greater decline in QoL than men without pre-existing depressive symptoms. However, findings based on the repeated cross-sectional data did not show similar interim impact – but instead no – or clinically irrelevant impact. Thus, taken together our findings do not suggest a substantial lasting impact of the lockdowns on mental health among young individuals.
Implications of all available evidence A great majority of earlier studies suggest that the lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic have had substantial detrimental impact on mental health, and that women and those with a pre-existing mental disorder constitute vulnerable subgroups. However, these studies vary considerably in terms of method applied. Our findings emphasise the importance of the use of different data setups, as well as methodology applied for the investigation of mental health. More studies based on high-quality data used in different settings are needed to fully understand the impact of the lockdowns on young people’s mental health, including potential disproportional impact on vulnerable subgroups.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was made possible by a grant from the Velux Foundation (grant number 36336, Standing together at a distance, how Danes are handling the corona crisis). The funders of the study had no part in the conception or design of the study, or in the decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Committee for SCIENCE and HEALTH (University of Copenhagen) finds, according to information received, that the project is compliant with relevant Danish and International standards and guidelines for research ethics.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Data sharing: According to European law (General Data Protection Regulation), data containing potentially identifying or sensitive personal information are restricted. However, for academic researcher, data could be available on request via DNBC dnbc-research{at}ssi.dk
Funding: This study was made possible by a grant from the Velux Foundation (grant number 36336, ‘Standing together at a distance – how Danes are handling the corona crisis’). The funders of the study had no part in the conception or design of the study, or in the decision to publish.
Ethics: This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency via a joint notification to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences – University of Copenhagen (ref. 514-0497/20-3000, ‘Standing together at a distance: how are Danish National Birth Cohort participants experiencing the corona crisis?’). The cohort is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee on Health Research Ethics under case no. (KF) 01- 471/94. Data handling in the DNBC has been approved by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) under ref. no 18/04608 and is covered by the general approval (Fællesanmeldelse) given to SSI. The 18-year follow-up was approved under ref. no 2015-41-3961. The DNBC participants were enrolled by informed consent.
Data Availability
According to European law (General Data Protection Regulation), data containing potentially identifying or sensitive personal information are restricted. However, for academic researcher, data could be available on request via DNBC dnbc-research@ssi.dk
