ABSTRACT
Background Large datasets of relational medical data, such as the adverse effects of drugs or vaccines, typically attain their large size, by relying on automatic, or semi-automatic, methods for generation. This often comes with a compromise on the precision of the generated data, which can be at least partially alleviated by having experts curate the data.
Aim Since having experts review a large dataset can be costly and time consuming, here we suggest using Wikipedia for this task – that is, augment the automatic generation step by an automatic curation step based on the expert knowledge accumulated in Wikipedia.
Methods To curate a dataset of adverse drug effects (ADEs), we suggest retrieving the Wikipedia page associated with the drug, and checking whether the ADE appears in the sections describing adverse effects. Drug indications, typically described in the opening paragraph of the page, are similarly filtered out.
Results We use the method to curate two large adverse drug effect datasets and show that the obtained datasets have a much higher precision relative to their originating ones.
Conclusions Algorithms which aim to infer drug-ADE relations, should at the very least be able to identify the “clear cut” cases. The high-precision benchmark constructed herein may therefore be a valuable resource for the evaluation of such algorithms.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available as supplementary materials.
