Abstract
Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), once considered a transient condition during pregnancy, is now a firmly established risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Women whose blood glucose levels do not return to normal soon after giving birth are particularly at high risk of developing established diabetes and consequent heart and blood vessel disease. Lifestyle interventions are recommended for women with GDM to prevent or delay the subsequent development of T2DM. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have suggested postpartum lifestyle interventions may be beneficial in reducing the risk of developing diabetes in women with GDM, however, included studies were generally small, many had a high risk of bias and subsequent data have become available with new trials likely to complete in the next couple of years. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, formal systematic review and meta-analysis of other approaches to preventing diabetes in this population (e.g. pharmacotherapy) has not been attempted. Therefore, an updated systematic review is needed and will be formulated as a living systematic review to ensure the inclusion of emerging studies.
Methods and analysis A living systematic review and a prospective meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of postpartum interventions in reducing the risk of developing T2DM in women with recent GDM.
Ethics and dissemination Ethics committee approval is not required. The data included will be from published studies, and a continued living systematic review and prospective meta-analysis will occur once a year for the next five years. Results of the review will be disseminated at relevant meetings.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42021279891
Strengths and limitations of this study
A living systematic review will allow continuous surveillance of emerging literature on different lifestyle interventions in women with a history of GDM and allow identification of effective strategies for diabetes prevention.
We estimate considerable heterogeneity of interventions which may limit our ability to make clear conclusions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Financial support from Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant (APP1149987); AP is supported by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1136898)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authorship
Data Availability
The search strategy is in the appendix. Data extraction form is accessible upon reasonable request.
