ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES Manual record review is a crucial step for electronic health record (EHR)-based research, but it has poor workflows and is error prone. We sought to build a tool that provides a unified environment for data review and chart abstraction data entry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS ReviewR is an open-source R Shiny application that can be deployed on a single machine or made available to multiple users. It supports multiple data models and database systems, and integrates with the REDCap API for storing abstraction results.
RESULTS We describe two real-world uses and extensions of ReviewR. Since its release in April 2021 as a package on CRAN it has been downloaded 2,204 times.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ReviewR provides an easily accessible review interface for clinical data warehouses. Its modular, extensible, and open source nature afford future expansion by other researchers.
LAY SUMMARY When doing research using data from electronic health records (EHRs), data may need to be extracted by hand, either to perform the study or to ensure its accuracy. However many researchers can’t access the EHR for this purpose. Even when researchers have access, they must flip between their review list, the EHR, and the location they are recording the results of their review, which is difficult and can cause errors. We developed a software application, ReviewR, to make this process easier and less error prone and have used it in two real-world projects.
Competing Interest Statement
LKW and MGK have received funding from Google Cloud Healthcare to support education through the Coursera Clinical Data Science Specialization and through that partnership received helpful technical advice on ReviewR support of Google BigQuery.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under award number K01LM013088. LVR was supported by National Institutes of Health awards UL1TR001422 (National Center for Advancing Translational Science), R01GM105688 (National Institute of General Medical Sciences), and U01HG008673 (National Human Genome Research Institute). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support provided by the University of Colorado Denver Data Science to Patient Value program and the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The first demonstration project was reviewed and approved by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (NUIRB). The second demonstration project was reviewed and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB). The demo database distributed with ReviewR and used for screenshots depicted in the manuscript uses synthetic data (see manuscript for details) that are not subject to ethical review.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All code for ReviewR is publicly available on both GitHub and CRAN.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ReviewR
