Abstract
Background Patients needing chronic RRT are at risk for severe COVID-19 and mount a lesser response to mRNA vaccination. We describe the impact of booster administration in these patients, amidst a third wave of infections and deaths.
Methods In the setting of a prospective COVID-19-centred cohort study in dialysis and kidney transplant patients we examined humoral responses to booster vaccination, and subsequent infection risk.
Results We quantified antibodies (DiaSorin) in 198 maintenance dialysis patients, 314 kidney transplant patients and 82 controls, without prior COVID-19 infection. Prior to boosting, 79% of controls, 35% of dialysis and 11% of transplant patients had levels ≥59 AU/ml (putatively protective), while 8-54 days after a third injection, respective rates were 100%, 93% and 58%. Risk factors for antibodies <60 AU/ml despite booster injection were transplant vs dialysis, OR=18.4 (p<0.0001), transitioning from dialysis to transplantation or vice versa, OR=15.7 (p<0.01) and days post injection, OR=0.953 (p<0.05). Antibody step-up after the booster inversely correlated with the second dose step-up (r=-0.33, p<0.01). In this surge, 2 controls, 2 dialysis and 9 transplant patients had COVID-19. Antibody level ≥59 AU/ml at any time point independently associated with reduced risk of infection during this surge, OR=0.264 (p=0.048).
Conclusions We show that a third dose of tozinameran boosts antibody levels in patients receiving RRT, as it did in controls. Most patients have now reached antibody levels likely to protect from infection. Antibodies were higher after the third dose compared to previous peaks, which may hint that the latest immune response may be more robust and sustainable, even in immune-compromised patients. Kidney transplant recipients showed the most striking enhancement, exhibiting >5.5-fold increase in the percentage of patients with protective antibody levels. However, many transplant patients remain below threshold even after boost injection, necessitating further boosting strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Ministry of Health of the State of Israel provided serology kits
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Hadassah Medical Organization's Helsinki Committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos