ABSTRACT
Background Changes in the brain’s default mode network (DMN) in the resting state are closely related to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Module segmentation can effectively elucidate the neural mechanism of ASD and explore the intra- and internetwork connections by means of the participation coefficient (PC).
Methods Resting-state fMRI data from 269 ASD patients and 340 healthy controls (HCs) were used in the current study. The PC of brain network modules was calculated and compared between ASD subjects and HCs. In addition, we further explored the features according to different age groups and different subtypes of ASD. Intra- and internetwork differences were further calculated to find the potential mechanism underlying the results.
Results ASD subjects showed significantly higher PC of the DMN than HC subjects. This difference was caused by lower intramodule connections within the DMN and higher internetwork connections between the DMN and networks. When the subjects were split into age groups, the results were verified in the 7-12 and 12-18 age groups but not in the adult group (18-25). When the subjects were divided according to different subtypes of ASD, the results were also observed in the classic autism and pervasive developmental disorder groups, but not in the Asperger disorder group. In addition, compared with the HC group, the ASD group showed significantly increased intranetwork connections between the DMN and the frontoparietal network.
Conclusions Less developed network segregation in the DMN could be a valid biomarker for ASD, and this feature was validated with different measures. The current results provide new insights into the neural underpinnings of ASD and provide targets for potential interventions using brain modulation and behavioural training.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involves only openly available human data, which can be obtained from: http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/abide/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵1 Co-first authors.
Data Availability
The data stored at our lab-based network attachment system: http://QuickConnect.cn/others. ID:guests; PIN dong@123.COM
