Abstract
Background Recent serological investigations imply waning immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but prior infection may impact the breadth and duration of vaccine immune responses.
Methods Using longitudinally collected blood samples from the COMMUNITY study, we determined binding (WHO BAU/ml) and neutralizing antibody titers against ten SARS-CoV-2 variants over seven months following BNT162b2 in healthcare workers with (n=111) and without (n=298) confirmed prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. A smaller group with (n=47) and without (n=61) confirmed prior SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was followed for three months.
Results Vaccination (BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) following SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in higher wild-type BAU/ml geometric mean titers (GMTs) at all sampling time points when compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees (all p<0.001). GMTs were 1875 BAU/ml in convalescent and 981 BAU/ml in naïve BNT162b2 vaccinees 6 weeks post vaccination. 29 weeks post vaccination, GMTs had decreased to 524 BAU/ml in convalescent and 148 BAU/ml in naïve vaccinees. GMT differences between convalescents and naïve following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 mirrored those after BNT162b2, but the titers were 4.5-fold lower following ChAdOx1 ncov-19 as compared to those after BNT162b2 (p<0.001). Finally, at all time points, neutralizing antibody titers against all ten tested SARS-CoV-2 variants were at least 2 respectively 3-fold higher in SARS-CoV-2 recovered as compared to naïve vaccinees following BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, respectively (all p<0.001).
Conclusions These findings of substantially more robust serological responses to vaccine after natural infection imply that prior infection may be taken into consideration when planning booster doses and design of current and future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine programs.
Introduction
Clinical trials and post marketing effectiveness data have shown that currently used COVID-19 vaccines protect strongly against hospitalization and death in most settings 1-3. However, real-world efficacy estimates are affected by population demographics, characteristics of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccine protocols and time since vaccination. An increased risk of breakthrough infections is now observed, partly explained by immune waning 4-8. A robust immune response after infection or vaccination is based on the induction of memory B and T cells generating virus specific antibodies and T-cell responses 9-13. Antibody levels have been shown to correlate inversely with risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection 14,15 and may, with standardized readouts 16, be used as a marker for correlates of protection. Time between prime and boost 17, the number of boosters administrated as well as infection prior to vaccination 18 impact the breadth and duration of immune responses. As an increasing number of persons become infected globally, vaccination post SARS-CoV-2 infection will become more frequent. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to positively impact vaccine responses 9,19-24 but little is known regarding long term effects. Although available vaccines have been proven safe and efficacious, they are not free of unforeseen adverse events 25,26. To optimize immunization programs, it is therefore crucial to study duration of immune responses including direct comparisons of vaccine platforms and the long-term effect of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent vaccine-induced responses in real world evidence studies.
Using longitudinally collected blood samples from the COMMUNITY (COVID-19 Immunity) study 13,24,27,28 we herein report binding and pseudo-neutralizing antibody titers elicited over seven months following mRNA BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer BioNTech) and over three months following adenovirus-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) vaccination in 517 healthcare workers (HCW) with and without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination.
Methods
Study population
The COMMUNITY study enrolled 2149 HCW at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, in April and May 2020. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG are analyzed every four months by multiplex antigen bead array 29. All HCW at Danderyd Hospital were offered vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, depending on availability, starting January 2021. Date and type of vaccine was obtained through the Swedish vaccination register (VAL Vaccinera).
This sub-study included a total of 517 HCW stratified into two groups depending on SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG seroconversion at any of the four-month follow-ups since study inclusion in April 2020. 337 HCW received BNT162b2 with a 3-week dose interval (range 21-28 days) between January 12th and February 24th, 2021. These were sampled at 6 weeks (range 5-8 weeks; 69 SARS-CoV-2 naïve and 27 SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees)), 12 weeks (range 11-14 weeks; 175 SARS-CoV-2 naïve and 52 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) and 29 weeks (range 27-30 weeks; 246 SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees and 68 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) post second BNT162b2 dose, respectively. 72 HCW received BNT162b2 with a 6-week dose interval (range 39-52 days) between April 17th and July 2nd, 2021 and were sampled at 12 weeks (range 11-14 weeks; 36 SARS-CoV-2 naïve and 36 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) post second BNT162b2 dose. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinees were fully vaccinated at a later time point than BNT162b2 vaccinees, between February 25th and May 31st, 2021. 108 HCW received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with a 12-week dose interval (range 71-92 days) and were sampled at 3 weeks (range 2-3 weeks; 48 SARS-CoV-2 naïve and 35 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) and 14 weeks (range 13-15 weeks; 56 SARS-CoV-2 naïve and 44 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) post second dose, respectively. Figure 1.
The cohort is divided into participants receiving BNT162b2 with a 3-4 week and a 6–8 week dose interval and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with a 10-12 week dose interval. Blue characters represent vaccinees that received BNT162b2 and yellow characters represent vaccinees that received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Light colored characters represent SARS-CoV-2 naïve and dark colored characters represent participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection prior vaccination. Test tubes represent time for blood sampling and syringes represent time for vaccination. w; weeks. d.i.; dose interval.
Demographics and vaccine status of the study population are presented in Table 1. The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (dnr 2020-01653) and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Age is presented as median with IQR; inter-quartile range. Weeks post second vaccine dose refers to point in time where sampling occurred and are presented as median together with the range. d.i.; dose interval, p.v.; post second vaccine dose.
Binding and pseudo-neutralizing antibodies
Binding antibodies (IgG) and pseudo-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 wild type (WT) and B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), B.1.526.1 (New York), B.1.617 (India), B.1.617.1 (Kappa), B.1.617.2 (Delta), B.1.617.3 (India), P.1 (Gamma), and P.2 (Zeta) variants, were measured in post vaccination samples using the V-PLEX SARS-CoV-2 Panel 13 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, USA) for IgG and ACE2 (quantifying the ability to inhibit the binding between the ACE2 receptor and the spike protein), respectively. Binding antibody titers for WT were calibrated against the WHO standard16 according to the manufacturer’s instructions and presented as Binding Antibody Units (BAU)/ml. Pseudo-neutralizing antibodies are expressed as arbitrary units (AU)/ml.
Microneutralization assay
Microneutralization based on cytopathic effects (CPE) was performed essentially as previously described 30. Briefly, serum was 3-fold serially diluted, mixed with virus, incubated for 1 hour and finally added, in duplicates, to confluent Vero E6 cells in 96-well plates. Original SARS-CoV-2 WT (isolated from a Swedish patient) and the Delta variant (from Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark), were used. After 5 days incubation, the wells were inspected for signs of CPE by optical microscopy. Each well was scored as either neutralizing (if no signs of CPE was observed) or non-neutralizing (if any CPE was observed). The arithmetic mean neutralization titer of the reciprocals of the highest neutralizing dilutions from the two duplicates for each sample was then calculated.
Statistical analyses
Spike IgG and pseudo-neutralizing antibody titers are presented as geometric mean titers (GMTs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Linear regression was used to compare continuous variables between groups and were adjusted for sex and age. Multiple samples per subject were analyzed using linear mixed effects regression with random intercepts per subject using the same adjustments as for linear regression. The correlation coefficient was calculated using Spearman’s correlation analysis. Linear regression and mixed effects regressions were performed in R (version 4.1.1) with nlme-package version 3.1.152 and contrast-package 0.22 while the remainder were done in GraphPad Prism (version 9.1.1).
Results
Antibody responses over seven months following BNT162b2 vaccination in SARS-CoV-2 recovered and naïve individuals
Almost all (99.8%) participants had detectable levels of spike IgG antibodies after vaccination. Notably, at all sampling time points, spike IgG GMTs were markedly higher in previously SARS-CoV-2 infected vaccinees compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees (all p<0.001). Table 2 and Figure 2A. A decrease of spike IgG GMTs by 2-fold between week 6 and 12, and by 6.6-fold between week 6 and 29 were observed in SARS-CoV-2 naïve BNT162b2 vaccinees. This decrease was not as explicit in vaccinees with SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination, as GMTs decreased by 1.5-fold between week 6 and 12, and by 3.6-fold between week 6 and 29 post vaccination.
Weeks post second vaccine dose refers to point in time where sampling occurred and are presented as median together with the range. CI; confidence interval, Ab; antibodies, d.i.; dose interval, p.v.; post second vaccine dose, AU; arbitrary unit, BAU; binding antibody unit.
A) Binding antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 wild type over 7 months following the second BNT162b2 dose and 3 months following the second ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 dose in SARS-CoV-2 recovered and naïve vaccinees, B) pseudo-neutralizing antibodies against the wild type over 7 months following the second BNT162b2 dose and 3 months following the second ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 dose in SARS-CoV-2 recovered and naïve vaccinees, and C) pseudo-neutralizing antibodies against the Delta variant type over 7 months following the second BNT162b2 dose and 3 months following the second ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 dose in SARS-CoV-2 recovered and naïve vaccinees. Dots and crosses represent geometric mean titers and bars represent 95 % CI. Solid lines represent SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees and dotted lines represent SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees. WT; wild type, BAU; binding antibody units, AU; arbitrary units.
Binding spike IgG titers correlated strongly to pseudo-neutralizing antibody titers against both the WT and the Delta variant (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.92, and 0.83, respectively, both p<0.0001). Consistent with spike IgG, substantially higher GMTs of pseudo-neutralizing antibodies were observed in vaccinees with SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees at all sampling time points (all p<0.001). Table 2 and Figure 2B-C. Among SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees, GMTs of pseudo-neutralizing antibodies against the WT and Delta variant decreased by 1.8-fold and 2.6-fold between week 6 and 12, and by 3.3-fold and 4.6-fold between week 6 and 29, respectively. For vaccinees with SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination, GMTs of pseudo-neutralizing antibodies against the WT and Delta variant decreased by 2.3-fold and 2.1-fold between weeks 6 and 12, and by 5.1-fold and 3.6-fold between weeks 6 and 29, respectively. Table 2 and Figure 2B-C. Notably, pseudo-neutralizing GMTs against the Delta variant reached similar levels and trajectories as pseudo-neutralizing GMTs against the WT, indicating a similar trend in response for the currently circulating Delta variant as for the initially circulating WT. Table 2 and Figure 2B-C.
Effect of BNT162b2 dose interval on antibody levels
It has been reported that a longer interval between BNT162b2 doses can result in higher antibody titres 31. In this cohort, BNT162b2 vaccinees were administered with a 3-4 week dose interval in January to February 2021, and with a prolonged dose interval of 6-8 weeks in April to July 2021.
12 weeks post second dose, there were no significant differences in spike IgG GMTs following BNT162b2 with the 3-4 week and the 6–8-week dose interval, regardless of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (all p>0.05). Table 2. Pseudo-neutralizing antibody GMTs against both the WT and Delta variant were, however, slightly but significantly increased 12 weeks following second dose after the prolonged dose interval (p=0.016 and p=0.017, respectively) in SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees when adjusted for sex and age. A similar trend was seen in SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees, although the differences were not significant (all p>0.05). Table 2.
Antibody responses over three months following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in SARS-CoV-2 recovered and naïve individuals
As data following BNT162b2 vaccination displayed an improved long-term immune response in SARS-CoV-2 recovered individuals we also explored this in the context of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Spike IgG GMTs in SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees were 4.5-fold lower following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 as compared to those after BNT162b2 (p<0.001). Similar to what was observed after BNT162b2 vaccination, spike IgG GMTs were substantially increased in SARS-CoV-2 recovered ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinees compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees at all sampling time points (all p<0.001). Table 2 and Figure 2A-C. In SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees, spike IgG GMTs declined 1.9-fold between week 3 and 14 post vaccination, whereas GMTs declined 2.3-fold between week 3 and 14 post vaccination in SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees.
Consistent with binding antibodies, substantially higher GMTs of pseudo-neutralizing antibodies were observed in SARS-CoV-2 recovered ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinees compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees at all sampling time points (all p<0.001). Table 2 and Figure 2 B-C. In SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees, GMTs against the WT and Delta variant decreased by 1.4-fold and 3-fold between week 3 and 14, respectively, whereas they decreased by 1.3-fold and 1.5-fold, respectively, in SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees. Similar to findings following BNT162b2 vaccination, GMTs against the Delta variant reached comparable levels and trajectories as GMTs against the WT. Table 2 and Figure 2 B-C.
Live-microneutralization compared to pseudo-neutralization
As a slightly higher capacity to inhibit binding of the Delta variant compared to the WT was found using the pseudo-neutralizing assay (Figure 2B-C), a live-neutralizing assay was performed in a sub-set of 34 (17 SARS-CoV-2 naïve BNT162b2 vaccinees and 17 SARS-CoV-2 naïve ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinees) participants. While results from these two assays correlated with regard to the WT and the Delta variant (rS=0.66 and 0.63 respectively, both p<0.0001), the live-microneutralization assay resulted in 25.2 % lower titres against the Delta variant compared to the WT.
Neutralization capacity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinees with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination
In light of the substantial increases in antibody titres observed in SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees as compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees, we proceeded to determine if SARS-CoV-2 variants contributed differently. Pseudo-neutralizing antibody titres were assessed against ten SARS-CoV-2 variants, including all variants of concern (VOC) (B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.135.1 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma) and B.1.617.2 (Delta)). Notably, neutralizing antibody titers against all ten tested SARS-CoV-2 variants were at least 2 respectively 3-fold higher in SARS-CoV-2 recovered as compared to naïve vaccinees following BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, respectively (all p<0.001). Figure 3 A-C and Table S1.
Neutralizing capacity A) 3 months and B) 7 months post BNT162b2 vaccination and C) 3 months post ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination against ten SARS-CoV-2 variants including the wild type (WT), B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), B.1.526.1 (New York), B.1.617 (India), B.1.617.1 (Kappa), B.1.617.2 (Delta), B.1.617.3 (India), P.1 (Gamma), and P.2 (Zeta) variants. Dots represent geometric mean titers and bars represent 95 % CI. Dark colored dots represent SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees and light colored dots represent SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees.
Discussion
Using a large cohort with longitudinally collected blood samples following SARS-COV-2 vaccination, we show that vaccination following SARS-COV-2 infection resulted in remarkably and sustained higher antibody titres with an increased neutralizing potency and breadth against SARS-CoV-2 variants as compared to vaccination in SARS-COV-2 naïve individuals. Furthermore, we reveal a significant decline in BAU/ml and pseudo-neutralizing antibody titres over the first months following both ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 vaccination. Direct comparisons showed substantially lower titres following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 compared to BNT162b2. These findings are important for decisions on booster doses and design of current and future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine programs, as these should be based on data from effectiveness studies and serological investigations calibrated against WHO standards.
We and others have previously shown that COVID-19 convalescents mount strong immune responses following mRNA 9,19-23 and adenovirus-vectored vaccines 24. We here extend these findings by showing that antibody titres remain substantially increased over three months following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and seven months following BNT162b2 in SARS-CoV-2 infected HCW with mild disease prior to vaccination. This suggests that the immune-strengthening effect of exposure to infection followed by vaccination is not a temporary phenomenon. It was recently demonstrated that the memory compartment continues to evolve after both natural infection and vaccination, but with a lesser increase in breadth following vaccination as compared to infection 18. Importantly, we found that SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees developed antibodies capable of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 variants to a higher extent than SARS-CoV-2 naive vaccinees. Neutralizing capacity against ten SARS-CoV-2 variants analysed, including all four VOCs, remained substantially higher in SARS-CoV-2 recovered vaccinees as compared to SARS-CoV-2 naive vaccinees throughout the study period. Although vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 recovered individuals may eventually need a booster, these findings suggest that vaccine in immune competent SARS-CoV-2 recovered evokes antibody levels that are sufficient for protection during a longer time period than those rendered in SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees.
Our findings of substantial reductions in antibody titres over the first three months following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and seven months following BNT162b2 are in line with several reports of waning vaccine efficacy from countries including Israel 4,5, UK 6,7 and the US 8. The comparatively lower titres following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 are also in line with prior data on lower vaccine efficacy of adenovirus vector-based vaccines as compared to mRNA vaccines 2,32. Specific antibody levels are used as a correlate of protection against infection following several established vaccines 33, and for SARS-CoV-2, binding and pseudo-neutralizing antibody titres correlate inversely with risk of infection 14,34. Extensive efforts are therefore now invested into establishing the levels at which vaccine-generated antibodies protect against infection, aiming to facilitate rapid licensure of new vaccine platforms, support recommendations for vaccine boosters and inform public health decisions. One such effort recently presented an 80% vaccine efficacy against symptomatic SARS-COV-2 infection at 264 BAU/ml, declining to 60% vaccine efficacy at 54 BAU/ml 35. These estimates were derived from a cohort vaccinated with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, but similar levels are shown for mRNA vaccines 36. Although these correlates require validation in further cohorts, our findings show that antibody titres have declined below these thresholds in a portion of study participants within 3-7 months from the second vaccine dose. Importantly, the estimations were derived in eras with a dominance of the Alpha variant, and the estimated titres may provide lower efficacy against infection with the current globally spreading Delta variant 37-39, which seems to have a higher transmissibility 40,41.
Optimal dose interval has been proposed to convey better vaccine efficacy via improved memory formation 17. A longer interval may indeed generate an improved memory formation, albeit at the price of a suboptimal protection during the longer interval between first and second dose in SARS-CoV-2 naïve populations. Although no significant differences in binding antibody titres, a slight elevation in pseudo-neutralization titres were found between the 3-4 week and 6-8 week dose interval in SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants, could indicate improved memory formation in the latter 42. Continued studies are needed to address potential differences in longevity of the immunological memory induced by different prime boost intervals and combinations of various vaccine platforms, as well as the optimal timing of additional vaccine doses.
This study is limited by the observational and single-centre nature. The study cohort moreover comprised HCW, and a majority of women of general working age. Antibody trajectories may differ in older populations, and in settings without repeated viral encounters with potential boosting of the immune memory.
In summary, our findings of a considerable antibody decline over 3-7 months, paralleled with reports of waning vaccine effectiveness within the same time frame, supports the administration of a third vaccine dose, particularly in individuals with risk factors for severe COVID-19. However, the striking and sustained increased titres and neutralizing breadth of antibodies in previously SARS-CoV-2 infected vaccinees as compared to SARS-CoV-2 naive vaccinees highlights the strong impact of infection prior to vaccination. These findings suggest that prior infection should be taken into consideration when planning booster doses and design of current and future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine programs.
Data Availability
The anonymized datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declaration of Interests
SoH has participated on AstraZeneca COVID-19 SCG Virtual Advisory Board. Otherwise, the authors declare no competing interests.
Data sharing
The anonymized datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Jonas & Christina af Jochnick foundation; Lundblad family foundation; Region Stockholm; Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation; Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab); Erling-Persson family foundation; CIMED and the Swedish Research Council. The funders above had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.