ABSTRACT
Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques have developed in recent years in research and clinical treatment. The identification of targets for TMS treatment is increasingly individualized based on morphology or function; however, whether individualized TMS targets could increase the treatment effectiveness of psychiatric disorders remains controversial.
Methods A meta-analysis was conducted to explore whether individualized TMS targets are better than standard targets. A total of 3340 studies were identified in a systematic search, and twelve were included in the quantitative review. Among them, eight used a structure-based individualized target selection method, nine were on depression, and four compared unilateral and bilateral stimulant targets.
Results Meta-analyses showed that: (1) individualized TMS targets increased the effectiveness in treating psychiatric disorders; (2) structural-based TMS targets brought additional treatment effectiveness, and PET-based structural selection methods proved to be valid; (3) there was no significant increase in the treatment effects of individualized targets in EEG-based and task-fMRI-based methods; (4) updated stimulant sequences did not increase the individualized target treatment effect; (5) individualized TMS targets showed increased treatment effectiveness in depression but not in schizophrenia; and (6) bilateral stimuli did not show additional effectiveness compared with unilateral stimuli.
Conclusions The current findings revealed that individualized TMS targets show additional treatment effectiveness compared to standard targets in treating psychiatric disorders, and structure-based selection methods are effective in identifying TMS targets. The current conclusions provide directions for future TMS research and provide valuable references for clinicians treating psychiatric disorders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The current research was supported by The Cultivation Project of Province-levelled Preponderant Characteristic Discipline of Hangzhou Normal University (20JYXK008) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY20C090005).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB board of Hangzhou Nomal University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors http://QuickConnect.cn/others ID: guests PIN: dong@123.COM
