ABSTRACT
Objectives Influenza vaccination varies widely across LTCFs due to staff behaviors, LTCF practices, and patient factors. It is unclear how seasonal LTCF vaccination varies between cohabitating but distinct short-stay and long-stay residents. Thus, we assessed the correlation of LTCF vaccination between these populations and across seasons.
Design National retrospective cohort using Medicare and Minimum Data Set (MDS) data.
Setting and Participants U.S. LTCFs. Short-stay and long-stay Medicare-enrolled residents age ≥65 in U.S. LTCFs from a source population of residents during October 1st-March 31st in 2013-2014 (3,042,881 residents; 15,683 LTCFs) and 2014-2015 (3,143,174, residents; 15,667 LTCFs).
Methods MDS-assessed influenza vaccination was the outcome. Pearson correlation coefficients were estimated to assess seasonal correlations between short-stay and long-stay resident vaccination within LTCFs.
Results The median proportion of short-stay residents vaccinated across LTCFs was 70.4% (IQR, 50.0-82.7%) in 2013-2014 and 69.6% (IQR, 50.0-81.6%) in 2014-2015. The median proportion of long-stay residents vaccinated across LTCFs was 85.5% (IQR, 78.0-90.9%) in 2013-2014 and 84.6% (IQR, 76.6-90.3%) in 2014-2015. Within LTCFs, there was a moderate correlation between short-stay and long-stay vaccination in 2013-2014 (r=0.50, 95%CI: 0.49-0.51) and 2014-2015 (r=0.53, 95%CI: 0.51-0.54). Across seasons, there was a moderate correlation for LTCFs with short-stay residents (r=0.54, 95%CI: 0.53-0.55) and a strong correlation for those with long-stay residents (r=0.68, 95%CI: 0.67-0.69).
Conclusion and Implications In LTCFs with inconsistent influenza vaccination across seasons or between populations, targeted vaccination protocols for all residents, regardless of stay type, may improve successful vaccination in this vulnerable patient population.
Brief summary In LTCFs, influenza vaccination was moderately correlated across all residents, but varied across seasons. Inconsistent vaccination among cohabitating residents may increase infection risk in LTCFs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This Brown University collaborative research was funded by Sanofi Pasteur. The authors institution retained the right to publish and publicly present all results. Incorporation of any edits suggested by Sanofi Pasteur was not compulsory. Dr. Zullo is also supported by National Institute on Aging grants R21AG061632, R01AG065722, RF1AG061221, and R01AG062492. The content and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board at Brown University approved the study protocol. Due to the use of de-identified administrative data, informed consent was not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding sources: This Brown University collaborative research was funded by Sanofi Pasteur. The authors’ institution retained the right to publish and publicly present all results. Incorporation of any edits suggested by Sanofi Pasteur was not compulsory. Dr. Zullo is also supported by National Institute on Aging grants R21AG061632, R01AG065722, RF1AG061221, and R01AG062492. The content and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Data Availability
Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 LTCF resident clinical assessments were linked to the Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF), Certification And Survey Provider Enhanced Reports System (CASPER), and LTCFocus facility data using unique identifiers for all LTCF residents enrolled in Medicare. These data have been previously described