Longitudinal changes and key determinants of meeting WHO recommended levels of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in a UK-based sample: Findings from the HEBECO Study

Background

Most European nations have undergone secondary or tertiary periods of lockdown in early 2021, with state mandated reductions in social contact, outdoor activities, and freedoms in place to reduce the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. One likely consequence of lockdowns has been changes to physical activity (PA) levels. Early evidence from manufacturers of wearable activity-trackers indicates a dose-response effect between the strictness of lockdown measures enacted by regional governments and the severity of reductions in step-count [2, 3]. Since these early findings, an abundance of cross-sectional studies has revealed highly heterogenous changes in PA levels, with some individuals showing improvements in PA levels [4-6] despite an overall downturn in PA [7-16]. This study aimed to corroborate and extend these findings beyond the first strict lockdown and period of eased restrictions in the UK, using an ongoing longitudinal cohort study, the HEalth BEhaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic (HEBECO) study.

Evidence from UK based studies aligns with global trends, showing decreases in individual’s PA across the first lockdown [2, 7, 17-19]. However, early longitudinal studies show mixed evidence of a reversal of this downturn beyond the first strict lockdown [2, 7, 17-19]. Evidence in the UK is not congruous, and the use of varied measures of PA between studies hampers recognition of clinically important changes in PA.

The health consequences of physical inactivity and sedentary behaviours are serious. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently named physical inactivity as the fourth largest cause of global disease burden and published recommendations for weekly PA, with a view to reducing this burden [20-22]. This encompasses engagement in 150 minutes of MVPA weekly (i.e., activities that increase heart rate and make one feel warmer) and two sessions of MSA per week (e.g., strength/resistance training) [20].

Adherence to the guidelines has been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and mortality associated with physical inactivity [22-28]. Increasing PA engagement can also reduce engagement in harmful behaviours [28-34] while preserving mental and physical wellbeing [29, 35]. Indeed, health behaviour changes are often ‘clustered’, e.g. engaging in less exercise is also associated with increased sedentary time and an increase in health risk behaviours such as alcohol consumption and poorer dietary habits [29]. As such, understanding groups at-risk of poorer PA engagement is a necessary step to unveiling the wider health consequences of enforced lockdowns.

Early evidence has also identified predictors of early negative changes in PA habits. These include older age [12, 13, 36] being female [12, 13], comingfrom a more disadvantaged [12, 36, 37] or non-white background [12, 36], having lower educational level [36], and having poorer physical and mental health [36, 38]. Few studies to date have provided longitudinal evidence beyond the period of eased restrictions, using the framework of WHO recommendations for PA [37, 38] that i) corroborates the persistence of associations with these sociodemographic, health and lifestyle factors; ii) examines whether poor PA engagement is reversed after lockdown is eased; and iii) whether any improvement of PA habits during the inter-lockdown periods is lost during subsequent lockdowns. This study therefore aimed to address this gap, posing the key research questions:

RQ1. How has the proportion of individuals attaining WHO recommended levels of total PA, MVPA and MSA, changed since the strict lockdown in April 2020 until January 2021 in a self-selected sample of UK adults?

RQ2. Across the period of follow-up, which health, sociodemographic and COVID-19 related situational factors are associated with meeting i) WHO recommended levels of total PA, ii) WHO recommended levels of MVPA and iii) WHO recommended levels of MSA in a self-selected sample of UK adults?

Methods

Results

Sample Characteristics

The analytic sample of 1,947 UK-based adults was principally female (70%, N=1363), middle aged (mean=50, standard deviation (SD)=14.7) and of white ethnicity (95%, N=1850) (table 1). Our sample also contained a high proportion (30%, N=584) of participants in the highest socioeconomic position based on household income, education, and home ownership relative to the proportions that might be expected from ONS census data [46]. Some significant differences existed between the analytic and excluded samples. The included sample were significantly younger (p<0.001), had more females (p=0.024), fewer smokers (p<0.001) and more individuals of overweight or obese BMI (p<0.008). Further comparisons are presented in table 1.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 1. Participant demographics at baseline.

RQ1: Meeting WHO Recommended levels of total PA, MVPA and MSA

Time-trend analysis demonstrated a steady decline in the proportions of individuals meeting WHO recommended levels of all PA types across the study period (figure 1). The proportion of individuals attaining WHO recommended levels of total PA decreased from baseline wave 1 (April-May) (19.5%, 95% CI 17.8-21.3%) to wave 2 (June-July) (17.7%, 95% CI 16.1-19.5%), wave 3 during the period of eased restriction (Aug-Sept) (15.2%, 95% CI 13.7-16.9%) and wave 4 during the second UK lockdown (Nov-Jan) (14.1%, 95% CI 12.6-15.9%). However, no significant differences were observed between the first two or latter two waves. Both MVPA and MSA showed similar decreases across the study period, but again showed no significant differences between waves 1 and 2, or between waves 3 and 4 (figure 1). This trend persisted in complete case analysis (supplementary tables 6,7 and 8).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Time trend analysis of PA levels across the COVID-19 pandemic.

Time-trends in proportions of participants meeting MVPA, MSA and both WHO PA guidelines & Wald χ2 pairwise comparison with Šidák correction. *p < 0.05

RQ2 i) Predictors of meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA

Sociodemographic and situational factors associated with meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA included socioeconomic position, being in strict isolation and those living alone. The highest two socioeconomic positions were associated with attaining WHO recommended levels of total PA (table 2). Those in strict isolation showed lower odds of meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA. Living alone showed time-specific effects only, predicting higher total PA attainment specifically during the period of eased restriction in August-September (p=0.001) (Figure 2; supplementary table 1). Health and behavioural factors including having overweight or obesity and a higher perceived risk from COVID-19 infection were negatively associated with attaining total recommended levels of total PA (table 2). The biggest predictors of meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA during the study period was meeting them prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (table 2). This relationship with pre-COVID PA levels also showed significant moderation by time, showing stronger associations by the second lockdown (p=0.037) and suggesting that failing to meet recommended PA levels pre-pandemic became more strongly associated with not meeting total PA levels as the pandemic progressed (Figure 2; supplementary table 2). Inclusion of time itself in adjusted models confirmed the unadjusted time-trend analysis, as time showed incrementally lower odds of meeting all PA types further into the pandemic (supplementary tables 1-5).

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup

Table 2. Factors associated with meeting WHO recommended levels of PA throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Time-varying associations of sociodemographic factors & meeting WHO recommended levels of PA

Time-differential associations of factors with meeting total WHO recommended PA levels, MSA & MVPA.

A) Meeting any PA recommendation pre-COVID-19 increased odds of meeting WHO recommended levels of PA during the second lockdown. B) Living alone showed higher odds of meeting total WHO recommended levels of PA during the period of eased restriction. C) Working/studying from home or attending a workplace was associated with higher odds of attainment of MVPA during the second lockdown. D) Gender (female) showed lower odds of MSA attainment during the period of eased restriction and second lockdown. E) Age shows a positive association with MSA attainment at these time points. * p<0.05

RQ2 ii) Predictors of meeting WHO recommended levels of MVPA

Sociodemographic and situational factors including age, gender, white ethnicity, and employment status showed varying associations with meeting WHO recommended levels of MVPA. Employment status showed time-specific associations with attaining sufficient MVPA. Both being employed from home (p=0.039) or attending a workplace (p=0.020) was associated with less MVPA engagement compared with being unemployed, retired, or a full-time carer during the second UK lockdown in November-January (Figure 2; supplementary table 3). Gender (female) showed a substantial negative association with MVPA attainment while white ethnicity showed a positive association (table 2). Unusually, having access to adequate exercise space at home was negatively associated with attaining MVPA levels. Again, health and behavioural factors showed significant negative associations with MVPA attainment. Participants with an overweight or obese BMI showed lower odds of attaining recommended levels of MVPA as did those with a chronic health condition. Pre-COVID-19 PA engagement and higher quality of life again proved the strongest predictors of attaining sufficient MVPA throughout the study period (table 2).

RQ2 iii) Predictors of meeting WHO recommended levels of MSA

Sociodemographic factors including age and being female both showed time-differential, negative effects on MSA at both wave 3 in August-September (p=0.008; p=0.002) and wave 4 in November-January (p=0.001; p=0.027) (Figure 2; supplementary table 5). Participants of white ethnicity showed substantially reduced odds of attaining recommended levels of MSA, as too did participants with an overweight or obese BMI (table 2). Risky health behaviours showed associations specifically with MSA engagement. Participants consuming alcohol above the recommended weekly limits as well as smokers both showed lower odds of meeting recommended levels of MSA (table 2). Lastly, higher quality of life and attaining sufficient MSA pre-COVID-19 proved strong predictors of meeting recommended MSA levels during the study period.

Discussion

Here we provide evidence for clinically meaningful changes in the PA levels of a self-selected UK-based sample of adults throughout four unique contexts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Proportions of individual’s meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA, MVPA and MSA all showed a decrease throughout April 2020 to January 2021; however, unlike previous studies which examined total PA habits, no recovery was observed during the period of eased restrictions in August-September 2020 [37, 38]. This study identified no significant difference between wave 1 during the first strict lockdown in April-May and wave 2 at the ending of the first lockdown in June-July. However, this study extends previous literature, identifying significant drops between these waves and the August-September wave during the period of eased restriction and November-January wave during the second lockdown in the UK [2, 47, 48]. In general, MVPA attainment in this sample was far lower than might be expected from other estimates of PA in the UK population [49, 50].

Many sociodemographic factors were predictive of differential PA engagement. White ethnicity was associated with meeting recommended levels of MVPA, but negatively associated with MSA attainment. Previous studies have observed higher attainment of both MVPA and MSA in white communities [51]. This finding suggests that individuals from different backgrounds may be opting to exercise in different ways during the lockdown.

Despite Bayes Factors suggesting inconclusive evidence for an effect of gender on meeting the WHO guideline levels of total PA, our data does still raise possible sex differences and socioeconomic inequities in attaining sufficient levels of MVPA and MSA. Females showed lower odds of meeting recommended levels of MVPA, specifically during the period of eased restriction and second lockdown. Increasing age showed the inverse associations with MVPA and MSA in line with other studies, but Bayes Factors provided evidence for ‘no effect’ of age on meeting WHO recommended PA levels [36]. Evidence is mixed as to the existence, and possible mediators, of sex-differences in PA engagement during the pandemic [16, 52]. Indeed, early cross-sectional data in other UK cohorts indicated significantly higher attainment of MVPA in females [16]; however, subsequent longitudinal studies have suggested little or no difference [53]. Age-related differences have been observed almost unanimously [16, 37] and may be driven by factors such as additional time and freedoms afforded to those who are financially independent which often accompanies older age [54]. However, our study does not corroborate this finding associated with age, despite still identifying strong relationships between greater PA engagement and socioeconomic position and high quality of life [55]. Further to this, participants engaged in negative health behaviours including smoking and excessive alcohol consumption were at greater risk of insufficient PA. These trends therefore align with previous evidence, which suggests the existence of ‘clustering’ of negative health behaviours and an exacerbation of sex-differences and socioeconomic inequities in PA engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. [29].

The most at-risk groups for poor PA engagement included those with a chronic health condition (e.g. stroke, heart disease, dementia), with overweight or obesity and those with a higher perceived risk from COVID-19, suggesting greater efforts should be made to enable those individuals asked to shield to complete their regular PA, especially given the consequences of even transiently increased sedentarism may be more severe for those with chronic conditions [22, 24, 56-58].

Situational factors were also associated with differing PA engagement. Living alone proved a positive predictor of meeting WHO recommended levels of total PA, specifically during the period of eased restrictions in August-September 2020, perhaps highlighting the importance of social sports and gyms for these individuals to attain their PA. Having adequate space indoors in which to exercise was negatively associated with attaining adequate MVPA. Perhaps expectedly therefore, MVPA proved the component of participant’s PA requirements most attenuated by being confined to the indoors whilst having to strictly isolate. This effect size was reduced when looking at total PA sessions, implying that indoor MVPA sessions may be fewer, shorter, or more difficult to attain than MSA, opening the possibility that MSA interventions may prove a useful and more sustainable target for individuals required to shield.

Lastly, pre-COVID-19 PA levels were the most consistent predictors of attainment of recommended levels of all PA types, suggesting relatively strong habits regarding routine PA. Establishing sufficient PA engagement more widely in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic may therefore remain the optimal target for primary prevention of poor PA attainment during future lockdowns.

Strengths and Limitations

This study provides novel evidence on factors associated with differences in PA engagement across four unique contexts during the pandemic in the UK and holistically explored the factors which may impact PA engagement, using a framework of internationally accepted recommendations for clinically meaningful PA.

Significant limitations, however, do exist. The WHO guidelines for PA are binary, thus not reflecting the total daily energy expenditure which is known to be a significant modulator of the beneficial effects of PA [22]. Despite repeating analyses with a count variable of PA session frequency, this study is not immediately comparable with studies examining total PA. Sedentary time, which has been shown to have independent, negative health effects [22], was not measured. Further studies should address this with objectively measured PA and sedentary time, while adopting the WHO recommendations as a standard.

The period of eased restriction and subsequent lockdowns beyond the first strict UK-wide lockdown varied by region, and thus individuals may have had differing restrictions during wave 4 depending on their region, as well as differing seasonal and weather trends, which were not modelled in this analysis. Several factors were necessarily coded as binary, including alcohol consumption and smoking, which does not account for the significant heterogeneity within these health behaviours. Lastly, use of a self-selected sample, the demographics of which do not accurately represent those of the wider UK population, and the reliance on self-reported measures opens the opportunity for both sampling and social desirability biases.

Conclusion

This study used PA data contributed by a self-selected UK-based sample to measure population level estimates and possible barriers to meeting WHO recommended levels of PA engagement over an eight-month period since April 2020. We observed population-level decreases in PA across the study period, without recovery during the periods outside of lockdown. Several at-risk groups were also identified with consistently lower odds of meeting the WHO recommended levels of PA, which could lead to greater health inequities over time. Future research should make efforts to further discern the situational and motivational reasons behind differences in these at-risk groups to inform future interventions and PA promotion.

Author Contributions

AH and LS conceived the study and designed the survey. JJM, SD and EB conducted analysis and interpretation. JJM drafted the manuscript. All authors examined final analyses and revised several drafts before approving the final manuscript.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data for this article is included with this submission.

Study protocol and survey documents can be found online at: Home | UCL HEBECO STUDY(ucl-covid19research.co.uk).

Funding

This project is partially funded by an ongoing Cancer Research UK Programme Grant to UCL Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group (C1417/A22962) and by SPECTRUM a UK Prevention Research Partnership Consortium (MR/S037519/1). SD & JJM funding is provided by an MRC grant (MR/N013867/1)

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by UCL Research Ethics Committee at the UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (PaLS) (CEHP/2020/579) as part of the larger programme ‘The optimisation and implementation of interventions to change behaviours related to health and the environment’.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests or conflicts of interests.