Abstract
Objectives Karoli Lwanga Hospital and Global Emergency Care, a 501(c)(3) nongovernmental organization, operate an Emergency Department (ED) in Uganda’s rural Rukungiri District. Despite available emergency care (EC), preventable death and disability persist due to delayed patient presentations. Implementation of effective EC requires assessment of socioeconomic, cultural, and structural factors leading to treatment delay.
Methods We purposefully sampled and interviewed patients and caregivers presenting to the ED more than 12 hours after onset of chief complaint in January-March 2017 to include various ages, genders, and complaints. Semistructured interviews addressing actions taken before seeking EC and delays to presentation once the need for EC was recognized were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, translated, and transcribed, enabling the interdisciplinary and multicultural research team to conduct thematic analysis utilizing a grounded theory approach.
Results The 50 ED patients for whom care was sought (mean age 33) had approximately even distribution of gender, as well as occupation (none, subsistence farmers and small business owner). Interviews were conducted with 37 caregivers and 13 ED patients. The majority of interviewees (mean age 38 years) were women with a primary education. The median duration of patients’ chief complaint on ED presentation was 5.5 days. On average, participants identified severe symptoms necessitating EC 1 day before presentation. Four themes of treatment delay before and after severity were recognized were identified: 1) Cultural factors and limited knowledge of emergency signs and initial actions to take ; 2) Use of local health facilities despite perception of inadequate services; 3) Lack of resources to cover the anticipated cost of obtaining EC; 4) Inadequate transportation options.
Conclusions Interventions are warranted to address each of the four major reasons for treatment delay. The next stage of formative research will generate intervention strategies and assess the opportunities and challenges to implementation with community and health system stakeholders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research ethics approval was obtained through the University of Arizona Institutional Review Board (Tucson), The AIDS Support Organization Research Ethics Committee (Kampala, Uganda), and the Ugandan National Council of Science and Technology (Kampala). Karoli Lwanga Hospital leadership supported the study. Verbal informed consent was approved by the organizations listed above due low literacy rates in the community. It was obtained from all participants, witness by the lead researcher (AP) and head research assistant (NC) and documented on a verbal consent form with AP's signature.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Membership of the Global Emergency Care Collaborative Investigators is provided in the Acknowledgments
Data Availability
Our IRB does not allow for data sharing, so we will be unable to publish the full interview transcripts (our data set). However, we can provide a supplement including our code book with further representative quotes to ensure readers have as broad an access as ethically possible.