Abstract
Background Access to health services plays a key role in cancer survival. Uneven distributions of populations and health facilities lead to geographical disparities. Location-allocation algorithms can address these disparities by finding new locations and capacities for health facilities. However, in oncology, opening new hospitals or moving them is difficult in practice, and should be handled carefully.
Methods We propose a method to measure the spatial accessibility to oncology care and identify the hospitals to grow to reduce disparities. We first ran a clustering algorithm to automatically label the hospitals in terms of oncology specialization. Then, we computed an accessibility score to these hospitals for every population location. Finally, we introduced CAMION, an optimization algorithm based on Linear Programming that reduces disparities in oncology accessibility by identifying health facilities that should increase their capacities.
Results We demonstrate our algorithm in metropolitan France. The clustering step let us identify different oncology specialization levels for hospitals. Most of the population in metropolitan France lived in good accessibility areas, especially in large cities. Lower accessibility zones are often rural or suburban municipalities. The optimization algorithm effectively manages to identify hospitals to grow, based on current oncology specialization and accessibility scores.
Discussion There is a tradeoff to be found by patients, between care center proximity and care center expertise, which is less likely to happen for patients living in good accessibility areas. The accessibility score is deliberately non-specific to cancer type but can be adapted to more precise pathologies. Our method is replicable in any country, given hospitals and population locations data. We developed a web application intended for healthcare professionals to let them to run the optimization algorithm with the desired parameters and visualize the results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
None
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Changed title, abstract and manuscript content.
Data Availability
Data available on request from the authors.
