Abstract
Objective This study examined the relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods An internet survey was conducted on December, 2020. We included 22,388 subjects for analysis. A question was used to determine whether subjects need support from their company to continue working in their current health condition. The odds ratios (ORs) of relation between work functioning impairment and necessary of support for sick workers were estimated using multilevel logistic regression analysis.
Results The OR of work functioning impairment among sick workers not receiving support was 5.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.19-6.06, p<0.001) and those receiving support was 1.82 (95% CI 1.64-2.03, p<0.001) compared to healthy workers.
Conclusions This study suggests that providing support to workers with illness may improve their work functioning impairment.
Introduction
An estimated 80% of workers continue to work despite having an illness or health problem1. The development of medical science has made it possible for workers to recover from illnesses that previously would have impaired their ability to work2. In addition, extension of the retirement age has brought about to an increase in the workforce of elderly people, which have a higher incidence of health problems3.
The phenomenon of working while ill is known as presenteeism. Workers who engage in presenteeism experience a variety of difficulties in their work. Specifically, they have a higher risk of absenteeism and unemployment4–6, and lower work productivity6–8. Moreover, presenteeism reduces workers’ quality of life9. In addition, prioritizing work may cause workers to miss opportunities for treatment, which may lead to severe disease10. To prevent the potentially detrimental effects of presenteeism on employment and the course of workers’ disease, it is important to support workers who desire to continue working while ill.
There is a growing global movement to support the employment of workers with illness. Support at work includes providing workers with flexible working hours so that those with illness can work while receiving medical treatment; and employment accommodations such as job adjustments, workplace support, and physical changes in the work environment to improve their ability to work. Around the world, such support is known as “work accommodations,” “reasonable accommodations,” or “fit note”11–15. In Japan, it is called “Ryoritsu Shien,” which means supporting workers who have the desire to continue working while suffering from an illness, with the Japanese government promoting “Ryoritsu Shien” to create a society where people with illness can also work. Accordingly, government campaigns, guidelines, and a revision of medical fees have been implemented. Further, some medical institutions have established new departments to promote the support of working people who suffer from illness16–19. Supporting the employment of workers with illness has a number of benefits, including reducing loss of work productivity20, sickness absence21, the risk of retirement11,12,22 and mental burden11.
It is particularly important to provide support to workers with illness in the current COVID-19 pandemic, a period during which many have experienced interruptions to treatment23. In addition, workers with illness suffer from psychological anxiety due to a susceptibility to infection and high risk of disease aggravation24, which is thought to lead to reduced work performance among those with illness. Thus, support for workers with illness during the COVID-19 pandemic is important for maintaining and improving workers’ health condition and work performance.
We hypothesized that support for workers with illness during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect their performance at work. Thus, we examined the relationship between support for workers with illness and a decline in work performance due to presenteeism during the COVID-19 pandemic. We further examined this relationship stratified by job type, because the relationship between workers with illness and decreased work performance will like be different depending on the type of job being performed owing to differences in the degree of demand and burden associated with each job and the types of support available.
Methods
Study design and subjects
This cross-sectional, internet monitor study was conducted on December 22–26, 2020, when Japan experienced its third wave of COVID-19 infection. Details of the protocol of this survey are reported elsewhere25. Briefly, data were collected from workers who had employment contracts at the time of the survey and were selected based on prefecture, job type, and sex.
Out of a total of 33,302 participants in the survey, 27,036 were included in the study after removing those who provided fraudulent responses. Because support for workers is provided by companies or supervisors, we only included employed workers. A total of 4,648 subjects who indicated that their occupation was company management, executive, self-employed, SOHO (Small Office, Home Office), agriculture, forestry, fishery, or whose workplace had only one employee were excluded. A total of 22,388 individuals (10,901 males and 11,487 females) were included in this analysis. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (reference No. R2-079). Informed consent was obtained using a form on the survey website.
Assessment of support for workers with illness
A single-item question was used to determine workers’ need for support: “Do you need any consideration or support from your company to continue working in your current health condition?” The participants responded by choosing from “Not necessary”, “Yes, but I am not receiving support”, and “Yes, I am receiving support”. We classified subjects who answered “Not necessary” as healthy workers, “Yes, but I am not receiving support” as sick workers not receiving support from their company, and “Yes, I am receiving support” as sick workers receiving support from their company.
Assessment of work functioning impairment
We assessed the decline in workers’ performance due to presenteeism using the work functioning impairment scale (WFun). WFun is a self-reported questionnaire developed using the Rasch model26. It consists of seven questions and the total score ranges from 7 to 35. The higher the score, the severity of work functioning impairment. A score of 21 or higher is defined as mild to severe work functioning impairment due to health problems. The utility of WFun was confirmed by the results of interviews with occupational health nurses in a previous study27. In this study, we used a six-item version, which can be equivalently converted to those of the original version based on the Rasch model.
Other covariates
The following survey items were considered confounding factors: age, sex, household income, educational status, number of employees at the workplace and marriage status.
Statistical analysis
The odds ratios (ORs) of work functioning impairment associated with support for workers with illness were estimated using a multilevel logistic regression model. The model was adjusted for age, sex, household income, educational status, the number of employees at the workplace, and marriage status We further estimated the multivariate ORs of work functioning impairment associated with support for workers with illness stratified by job type (mainly desk work, mainly interpersonal communication, and mainly manual labor).
A p value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using R ver.1.4.1103 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)28.
Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the subjects in this study. 73.6% (n=16,486) of the subjects were healthy workers, 16.8% (n=3,765) were sick workers receiving support from their company, and 9.5% (n=2,137) were sick workers not receiving support from their company. The mean age and proportion of current smokers were lower among sick workers receiving support from their company than sick workers not receiving support from their company. In contrast, household income, educational background, the number of employees at the workplace, and marriage status tended to be higher among sick workers receiving support from their company than sick workers not receiving support from their company.
Characteristic of the subjects
Table 2 shows the ORs and adjusted ORs derived from multivariate models of mild to severe work functioning impairment. ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment in age- and sex-adjusted subjects, were significantly higher among sick workers not receiving support from their company (OR=5.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.19-6.06, p<0.001) and sick workers receiving support from their company (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.62-2.00, p<0.001) than healthy workers, respectively. After adjusting for household income, educational status, the number of employees at the workplace, and marriage status, ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment were likewise significantly higher in sick workers not receiving support from their company (OR=5.49, 95%CI 5.08-5.93, p<0.001) and sick workers receiving support from their company (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.62-2.00, p<0.001) than healthy workers, respectively.
We also examined the relationship after stratifying by job type: mainly desk work, mainly interpersonal communication, mainly manual labor. Among subjects engaged mainly in desk work, the ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment were significantly higher in sick workers not receiving support from their company (OR=6.70, 95%CI 5.99-7.50, p<0.001) and sick workers receiving support from their company (OR=1.84, 95%CI 1.59-2.14, p<0.001) than healthy workers. Likewise, among subjects engaged mainly in interpersonal communication, the ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment were significantly higher in sick workers not receiving support from their company (OR=4.67, 95%CI 4.00-5.45, p<0.001) and sick workers receiving support from their company (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.55-2.38, p<0.001) than healthy workers. Similarly, among subjects engaged mainly in manual labor, the ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment were significantly higher in sick workers not receiving support from their company (OR=4.97, 95%CI 4.28-5.77, p<0.001) and sick workers receiving support from their company (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.35-2.07, p<0.001) than healthy workers. Multivariate analysis showed similar tends in the adjusted ORs of mild to severe work functioning impairment to those observed in the unadjusted models.
Discussion
This study examined the relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment in a large population living in Japan. Workers who felt unsupported had a 5.5-fold higher OR of mild to severe work functioning impairment than those who did not need support. Meanwhile, workers who felt supported had a 1.8-fold higher OR of work functioning impairment than workers who did not need support. The reduced risk of work functioning impairment for workers receiving support suggests that a company’s support of workers with illness may improve worker performance. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment in Japan.
We showed that workers with illness have higher work functioning impairment than those who are healthy. Individuals who work with health problems have been reported to experience work disability and lower work productivity6–8. There are a variety of reasons why workers with illnesses have reduced work ability. First, the nature of their symptoms or illness can reduce workers’ ability to perform their job or certain tasks. For example, pain or musculoskeletal diseases, which are typical causes of presenteeism, lead to decreased physical tolerance and hinder performance in tasks such as handling heavy objects. In addition, sleep disorders and mental health problems, which are a major cause of presenteeism, impair concentration and cognitive function29. Some illnesses require workers to restrict certain tasks, such as shift work, business trips, and work at heights, to ensure safety and to avoid worsening the illness. Second, hospitalization and hospital visits for treatment may reduce working hours and interrupt work schedules. Individuals who work while experiencing work-related disability due to presenteeism have an increased risk of future days off work, job loss, and exclusion from the labor market4–6. Appropriate support for workers, such as changing the contents of their work and adjusting their working hours, are expected to decrease the loss in work performance due to presenteeism and to reduce the risk of lost work days and unemployment.
Company support can reduce work functioning impairment among workers with illness. In this study, we found that the OR of mild to severe work functioning impairment was approximately three times higher among workers who felt unsupported than those who felt supported. People who work with illness or under poor health experience a variety of difficulties performing their duties and continuing to work. Support for workers with illness in the formed of adjustments to work hours and shifts, job descriptions to match their work ability, and changes to the physical work environment can help them adjust to work. These actions are thought to maintain workers’ ability to perform work while suppressing the decline in work functioning impairment. In addition, support from supervisors and coworkers is thought to enhance the effectiveness of these actions. Effectiveness is also considered enhanced by a good health climate, or in other words the perception shared by employees of the degree to which the team they belong to is concerned about health issues, and their care and communication of related issues. A previous study reported that greater support from supervisors and colleagues is associated with lower work productivity loss due to presenteeism30–31. In addition, a good health climate is associated with lower presenteeism32–34. The support of companies in regulating workers’ health and work environment is thus expected to lead to improvements in workers’ presenteeism and performance.
We observed a similar relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment across the job types examined. We divided occupations into three groups, namely primarily desk jobs, primarily interpersonal communication, and primarily physical labor. Different job types have different degrees of psychological and physical demands. Workers with back pain who engage in physical work naturally require different support to those undergoing anti-cancer drug treatment who work at a desk. While we did not identify the details of the support provided, our results nevertheless suggest that providing support for workers based on their job type and illness and in line with their needs is useful for slowing or halting the decline in work functioning impairment across all job types. While support is increasingly being recommended for workers with illness, there remains no unified view on the best type of support to provide workers with certain illnesses and performing certain jobs. Such support is currently being implemented through collaboration among workers, employers, attending physicians, and industrial physicians. In the future, studies may identify concrete recommendations of the most effective type of support to provide according to workers’ job type.
This study had some limitations. First, because it was a survey of Internet monitors, a degree of selection bias could not be unavoided. To minimize this, we selected subjects based on their region, occupation, and prefecture in terms of infection rate. Second, given the cross-sectional design, we could not determine the causal relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment. Workers with mild work functioning impairment who are able to work may receive support more readily. Third, we did not identify workers’ symptoms or disease in our study. The effect of support on the improvement in work functioning impairment may depend on the type and degree of illness or symptoms exhibited by workers, combined with their job and tasks.
In conclusion, this study showed that there is a relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment in a large population of workers across Japan. Workers with illnesses who felt they were receiving support from their companies were less likely to have work functioning impairment than those who reported not receiving support. These results suggest that support for workers with illnesses may improve their work functioning impairment.
Clinical Relevance
This study revealed a relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment. While workers continue to work with illnesses has been increasing, this survey shows the importance for companies to support workers with illness.
Data Availability
Raw data were generated at [facility name]. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [initials] on request.
Acknowledgements
Present members of the Collaborative Online Research on the Novel-coronavirus and Work (CORoNaWork) Project are: Dr. Yoshihisa Fujino (current chairperson), Dr. Akira Ogami, Dr. Arisa Harada, Dr. Ayako Hino, Dr. Chimed-Ochir Odgerel, Dr. Hajime Ando, Dr. Hisashi Eguchi, Dr. Kazunori Ikegami, Dr. Keiji Muramatsu, Dr. Koji Mori, Dr. Kyoko Kitagawa, Dr. Masako Nagata, Dr. Mayumi Tsuji, Dr. Rie Tanaka, Dr. Ryutaro Matsugaki, Dr. Seiishiro Tateishi, Dr. Shinya Matsuda, Dr. Tomohiro Ishimaru, Dr. Tomohisa Nagata, Dr. Yosuke Mafune, and Ms. Ning Liu, in alphabetical order. All of the members are affiliated with the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Footnotes
Sources of Funding This study was funded by a research grant from the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan; a general incorporated foundation (Anshin Zaidan) for the development of educational materials on mental health measures for managers at small-sized enterprises; Health, Labour and Welfare Sciences Research Grants: Comprehensive Research for Women’s Healthcare (H30-josei-ippan-002) and Research for the establishment of an occupational health system in times of disaster (H30-roudou-ippan-007); and scholarship donations from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Conflict of interest None declared.
Ethics approval: This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (reference No.R2-079 and R3-006).