Monoclonal antibodies therapy for Covid-19 - Experiences at a regional hospital

Introduction

With the occurrence of Covid-19, a demand for the rapid development of modern approachesappeared and techniques used in oncology such as mRNA vaccination and humanized monoclonal antibodies (Buss et al. 2012) have been rapidly adapted for the use in this infectious disease (Alvi et al. 2020). The effectiveness of the monoclonal antibody (mab) cocktails Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (Dougan et al. 2021) and Casirivimab/Imdevimab (Weinreich et al. 2021) has recently been demonstrated for patients at risk for unfavourable outcome (Taylor et al. 2021) of Covid-19 before severe symptoms appear. These mabs are directed against the SARS-CoV2-Spike Protein (Hurt et al. 2021), which facilitates the binding to the cell surface receptor ACE2. Such antibodies are either directed against highly conserved epitopes or applied in pairs to reduce the selection of S-protein mutations that would cause the development of resistant viral strains (Esmaeilzadeh et al. 2021). We here report on initial experiences with this therapy in our regional hospital.

Methods

Results

The two groups did not differ significantly in most of the clinical data such as age, sex and Covid-19 risk factors (Tab. 1 and supplementary table 1). However, there were differences in the observed symptoms, especially the occurrence of coughing and dyspnoea and, consequently, arterial pO₂ and pCO₂ values, which correlates with the dissimilar time between initial positive RT-PCR result, symptom onset and time of hospitalization. The most important significant difference in the two groups was found for the time of hospitalization (9.3 days versus 17.4 days, p < 0.001) but not death after positive PCR based Covid-19 diagnosis (two target amplification). Also, we found no difference in the course of the Ct-values of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR during hospitalisation (Fig. 1)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results from nasal swaps of the patients. Data are presented as average C_t including standard deviation (A) or 2^(40-Ct) (B) after initial positive RT-PCR diagnosis to visualize the decrease of viral load over time. Ct-values considered as negative were set to 40.

Discussion

In this small retrospective observational study, we could detect a significant shortening of hospitalisation time in the mab-treated cohort, consistent with larger studies published recently (Dougan et al. 2021, Weinreich et al. 2021). This demonstrates that this treatment can be highly effective as long as patients at risk are identified early, before severe symptoms occur. This will become important to avoid a high burden of hospitalized patients when greater Covid-19 incidences will appear. To achieve this, we have encouraged residential physicians by mail and media to immediately direct their SARS-CoV-2 positive patients having significant risk factors and beginning symptoms to our hospital for early therapy. The observed differences in blood gases as well as the frequency of coughing and dyspnoe reflect the different time after first positive RT-PCR and hospitalisation. However, we were not able to reproduce the reported early decrease in RT-PCR Ct-values (Dougan et al. 2021) in the treatment group (Fig. 1). However, especially at longer times after initial PCR, only patients being still positive by RT-PCR remain in this analysis, which might skew the result. Clearly, a higher number of patients will be needed to clarify this result.

It was also disappointing that about 10 % of the patients had a fatal outcome in both groups. This result might be due to the selection of patients, having a high number of risk factors. Again, larger numbers are needed to clarify this result.

Altogether, our experiences with this mab therapy are very encouraging in terms of avoiding long hospitalisation times in risk-patients as soon as the mabs are applied early in disease progression, which is consistent with the results of larger studies published recently. Nevertheless, efficient ways to inform patients on the availability of this therapy are needed.

Funding

This work was funded by institutional funds only. The monoclonal antibodies were provided by the German Federal Ministry of Health.

Potential conflicts of interest

All authors: No conflicts of interest exist.

Author contributions

J.P. and G.B: examination and treatment of patients, data collection, manuscript editing, project administration, N.N: data collection and statistics, manuscript writing and editing.