Health-Related Quality of Life and psychological distress of adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Geneva

1. INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures put in place by public health authorities to contain its spread have caused significant disruptions in daily life and raised concerns for mental health of the entire population, and in particular adolescents [1]. Adolescence, defined as the developmental phase from childhood to adulthood [1,2], is characterized by important psychological and physical changes, greater vulnerability to external events, and less resources to adapt to hard circumstances [3]. During this sensitive stage of life, the importance of peer-interactions increases in parallel with a desire for greater autonomy from parents [4].

Because of increased difficulties to meet these developmental needs, adolescents may have been particularly affected by the pandemic [5], despite being at low risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [6]. Educational disruptions due to school closures or quarantine, the widespread use of distance learning, the introduction of social distancing, or cancellation of extra-curricular activities combined with the general stay-at-home message, led to significant changes in daily life, less time spent with peers, and more with the family. This situation could have exacerbated tensions within the family or, represented an opportunity to strengthen family relationships [7]. These unprecedented circumstances also resulted in changes in health behaviours among adolescents such as an increase in screen time [8] and “junk food” consumption [9], together with a decrease in physical activity [10]. Adolescents may have been overly burdened by these life changes along with the worrying pandemic environment, as confirmed by a narrative review showing that adolescents’ mental health was negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic situation [11]. Adolescents living in underprivileged families or whose parents present a decreased mental or health state, including a SARS-CoV-2 infection, could be particularly vulnerable as they may have less support and resources to adapt to the changes induced by the pandemic [12,13].

Sanitary restrictions and mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic were relatively light in Switzerland compared with other countries [14], which may have resulted in a reduced impact on adolescents. After a first 10 week lockdown in spring 2020, schools remained open, while restrictions such as limitations on size of gatherings, remote work and mask wearing in public spaces from 12 years old were maintained. Inland travel was never limited; non-essential shops, sport facilities and cultural places intermittently closed according to the epidemiological situation. Yet, it is important to assess adolescents’ well-being and psychological distress in this specific context to be able to internationally compare the impact of different measures. A better understanding of adolescents’ well-being during this period is also useful for the design of new measures as the COVID-19 pandemic continues.

In this study, we assess adolescents’ health related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological distress, as well as their risk factors. We also compare their own and their parents’ perceptions. Data comes from a population-based sample of adolescents in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland, primarily recruited for a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey during the second COVID-19 wave.

2. METHODS

Survey design

A serological study was conducted between November 23rd and December 23rd 2020, in the general population of the canton of Geneva, Switzerland [15]. Children and adolescents aged 6 months to 17 years were randomly selected from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office’s registers and were invited with their family members for a free anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology. 597 families participated (participation rate: 17%). Of these, 194 families had adolescents aged between 14 and 17 years, and were included in the current study. This age range was chosen for adolescents to be mature enough to autonomously answer the study questionnaire.

Each family designated a “referent parent” who completed comprehensive health and socio-demographic online questionnaires about themselves and their child(ren). Additionally, adolescents were asked to complete a paper questionnaire about their well-being and life habits since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, mid-March 2020. This questionnaire was completed during the serology appointment in a separate area ensuring confidentiality, especially from parents. Adolescents were included in this analysis if the three above-mentioned questionnaires were completed (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Study flow diagram

3. RESULTS

The sample consisted of 240 adolescents from 194 households. Mean age was 15 years (SD 2.1 years) and 47% were females. Referent parents’ mean age was 47 years (SD 9.0 years), 75% being mothers. Table 1 presents a descriptive overview of the adolescents’ and their parents’ socio-demographic characteristics.

4. DISCUSSION

In this population-based study, we observed that a meaningful proportion of adolescents reported a low well-being HRQoL and some psychological distress during the second COVID-19 wave in Switzerland, 8 to 9 months after the start of the pandemic. Adolescents’ self-reported well-being was generally corroborated by their parent’s observation. Risk factors for a low well-being from the adolescents’ perspective included a younger age and a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology of the referent parent, while being a girl was the only risk factor for low HRQoL as perceived by parents. Girls compared to boys, and adolescents living in households with lower family well-being, were at higher risk of misperception by their parents. When looking at psychological distress, risk factors for adolescent-reported sadness or loneliness included being a girl, spending more time on social networks or living in a household with a disadvantaged financial situation, as well as characteristics of the referent parent such as older age, positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology and lower mood.

Compared to the Swiss pre-pandemic reference level where the KIDSCREEN-10 median corresponded to a score of 80 [16,22], adolescents presented lower HRQoL in this study with a median of 72.5 (MAD = 14.8), which may be partly explained by the impact of the pandemic. This is in line with results from other studies in China [23], Brazil [24], Germany [17], Australia [25], India [26], Spain [27] and Italy [27] which reported high levels of adolescent stress, worry and anxiety during the pandemic, likely due to restrictive measures to contain COVID-19 spread and the worrying pandemic environment. Estimates of sadness and loneliness among adolescents were lower in the present study than what reported in other studies in China [23], India [26], Spain [27] and Italy [27]. However, most previous studies were based on convenience samples and were not population-based. Further, in Switzerland measures to contain virus spread were comparatively less strict than in other countries. For example, inland travel, small gatherings and outdoor sports were never forbidden [14,28]. Finally, during the study period sanitary measures were regularly changing in Geneva, including restrictions on extra-curricular activities and mask wearing at schools, but were never as strict as during the first pandemic wave when schools were closed and activities suspended [14]. The psychological distress estimates are thus likely to be lower than what would have been observed during the first wave, when most other studies have been conducted [23,26,27].

Lower well-being was associated with a younger age, as also found by Ravens-Sieberer et al [17] and with being a girl, as generally observed [25,29]. Parental lower mood was a risk factor for adolescent psychological distress, which is consistent with studies showing that parent’s mental health directly impacts children’s functioning [12]. Living in a crowded household was associated with adolescents’ psychological distress, which could be explained by difficulties to maintain privacy and a personal space at home [30]. This aspect has possibly worsened since the start of the pandemic as household members were likely to spend more time at home than usual. On the opposite, household size was not associated with adolescents’ well-being, consistent with other findings [31].

In accordance with warnings issued by psychologists, an increase in time spent on social networks was associated with sadness and loneliness [32]. Causality could be bidirectional. As a consequence of other activities being restricted, such as sport or music lessons, adolescents may have felt lonely, sad and bored, and thus have spent more time on social media. Conversely, it may have increased their exposure to alarming and contradictory information and affected their well-being [33]. Interestingly, overall screen time was not related to psychological distress, suggesting that examining the type of online activities may be of more significance than the overall screen time [34].

Another unexpected finding was that adolescents’ low HRQoL was associated with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology of the parent but not with their own serological result. In line with other results [35], this may reflect that adolescents were more worried or impacted by their parents health rather than by their own during the COVID-19 pandemic. It may also mirror the impact on adolescents of potential difficult circumstances linked with a parent infected by SARS-CoV-2, such as a severe disease or long-term effects due to long COVID [36]. Adolescents’ negative anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology was associated with loneliness. A possible explanation could be that adolescents respecting social distancing measures more carefully were less infected but also felt lonelier, although this remains speculative at this stage.

An association between poor socioeconomic conditions and adolescents’ psychological distress was probably already present before the COVID-19 pandemic [37]. However, its significance was likely to increase as restrictions may have resulted in fewer quiet spaces, less resources to help with school work or increased likelihood of financial instability for adolescents in general, and more particularly vulnerable ones [13]. Longitudinal studies are necessary to assess the effect of the pandemic on adolescents’ mental health over time. More specifically, the impact of socioeconomic conditions should be examined, as deprivation could result in lower resilience and constitute a risk factor for persistent low well-being.

Adolescents’ and parents’ perceptions of adolescents’ HRQoL matched in most cases. This finding is important as parents play a role in the early detection of psychological distress among their children and in care seeking [38]. Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, parents play a key role in reducing the negative psychological impact on their children, for example through attention and supportive behaviours, such as keeping regular routines as much as possible or providing clear explanations about the situation [39]. However, 9.5% of the adolescents presented a low HRQoL that did not seem to be identified by their parents. Misperception was more likely among girls and adolescents living in families with lower well-being; these adolescents may represent a vulnerable group whose mental health issues are under-recognized.

The study presents several limitations. First, it is a cross-sectional study relying on self-reported data, without any pre-pandemic hindsight coming from the same sample. It does not allow us to firmly conclude whether the reported adolescents’ low quality of life is caused by the pandemic. The sample size is quite small, which limited statistical power. Finally, though randomly invited, study participants come from a higher socioeconomic background than the Geneva population. As a consequence, estimates of low well-being and psychological distress may have been underestimated. This study also presents several strengths. First, it relies on a randomly selected population-based sample. Thanks to the family-based design, data comes from both adolescents and their parents, which enables comparisons of both perceptions. Furthermore, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is assessed with an objective measure. Finally, the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the sample are assessed through a wide range of indicators, at the individual and household levels.

5. CONCLUSION

Amid the COVID-19 second wave in Geneva, a meaningful share of adolescents reported low psychological well-being, especially those living in unfavourable family environments, including crowded households, in poor financial situation or with distressed parents. Tailored measures, especially targeting these vulnerable adolescents, are necessary and could include free psychological consultations or resources for parents to react adequately to this special situation. Finally, monitoring is necessary to evaluate the long-term effects of the pandemic on adolescents’ mental health and inform decision-makers as the pandemic continues. Indeed some of the impacts may be temporary thanks to the lifting of restrictions, while others may persist over time, especially among vulnerable individuals.