Abstract
Background Following a vegetarian diet has become increasingly popular and some evidence suggests that being vegetarian may be associated with a lower risk of cancer overall. However, for specific cancer sites, the evidence is limited.
Aim To assess the associations of vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets with risks of all cancer, colorectal cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, and prostate cancer, and to explore the role of potential mediators between these associations.
Methods We conducted a prospective analysis of 472,377 UK Biobank participants who were free from cancer at recruitment. Participants were categorised into regular meat-eaters (n=247,571), low meat-eaters (n=205,385), fish-eaters (n=10,696), and vegetarians (n=8,685) based on dietary questions completed at recruitment. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all cancer incidence and separate cancer sites across diet groups.
Results After an average follow-up of 11.4 years, 54,961 incident cancers were identified, including 5,882 colorectal, 7,537 postmenopausal breast, 9,501 prostate cancer cases. Compared with regular meat-eaters, being a low meat-eater, fish-eater, or vegetarian were all associated with a lower risk of all cancer (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00; 0.90, 0.84-0.96; 0.86, 0.80-0.93, respectively). Being a low meat-eater was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in comparison to regular meat-eaters (0.91, 0.86-0.96); there was heterogeneity in this association by sex (p=0.007), with an inverse association across diet groups in men, but not in women. Vegetarian postmenopausal women had a lower risk of breast cancer (0.82, 0.68-0.99), which was attenuated and non-significant after adjusting for body mass index (BMI; 0.87, 0.72-1.05); in mediation analyses, BMI was found to possibly mediate the observed association. In men, being a fish-eater or a vegetarian was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (0.80, 0.65-0.99 and 0.69, 0.54-0.89, respectively).
Conclusion Low and non-meat-eaters had a lower risk of being diagnosed with cancer in comparison to regular meat-eaters. We also found that low meat-eaters had a lower risk of colorectal cancer, vegetarian women had a lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, and vegetarians and fish-eaters had a lower risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. The lower risk of colorectal cancer in low meat-eaters is consistent with previous evidence suggesting an adverse impact of meat intake. The lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in vegetarian women may be explained by their lower BMI. It is not clear whether the other differences observed, for all cancers and for prostate cancer, reflect any causal relationships or are or due to other factors such as residual confounding or differences in cancer detection.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by the Cancer Research UK grant (C8221/A29017) and by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the Word Cancer Research Fund International grant programme (2019/1953). CZW is supported by the Nuffield Department of Population Health Doctor of Philosophy student scholarship. YD is supported by the World Cancer Research Fund UK grant (2019/1953). TYNT is supported by the Nuffield Department of Population Health Intermediate Fellowship and the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M012190/1). RKK is supported by the Clarendon Scholarship from the University of Oxford. AK is supported by the Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health (Livestock, Environment and People; 205212/Z/16/Z). APC is supported by a Cancer Research UK Population Research Fellowship (C60192/A28516).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank was approved by the NHS North West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (16/NW/0274). All participants provided informed consent at recruitment, allowing for follow-up using data-linkage to health records.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
UK Biobank is an open access resource. Bona fide researchers can apply to use the UK Biobank dataset by registering and applying at http://ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply/.
