ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has stimulated a staggering increase in online information access, as digital engagement became necessary to meet the demand for health, economic, and educational resources1, 2. We pursue insights about inequity in leveraging online information, spanning challenges with access and abilities to effectively seek and use digital information2–4. We observe a widening of digital inequalities through a population-scale study of 55 billion everyday web search interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic across 25,150 US ZIP codes. We observe that ZIP codes with low socioeconomic status (SES) and high racial/ethnic diversity did not leverage health information and pandemic-relevant online resources (e.g., online learning, online food delivery) as much as regions with higher SES and lower levels of diversity. We also show increased shifts in online information access to financial or unemployment assistance for ZIP codes with low SES and high racial/ethnic diversity. These findings demonstrate that the pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities in online information access and highlight the role of large-scale, anonymized data about online search activities in digital disparities research. The results frame important questions and future research on identifying and targeting interventions for vulnerable subpopulations that could reduce further widening of digital access inequalities and associated downstream outcomes including health, education, and employment3.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This study is not a clinical trial. This study is a retrospective observational study and a secondary analysis on already collected data.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by Microsoft Research. T.A. was supported by NSF grant IIS-1901386, NSF grant CNS-2025022, NIH grant R01MH125179, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-004841), and the US Office of Naval Research (#N00014-21-1-2154).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Microsoft Research Institutional Review Board (IRB).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Raw US census data are publicly available through the Census Reporter API (https://censusreporter.org/). Geographical area measurements are available through the US Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/2010/geo/state-area.html). Seasonally adjusted US unemployment claims data for 2020 is available through the US Department of Labor (https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp). The Bing data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author with a clear justification and a license agreement. The Bing data are not publicly available.
https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/2010/geo/state-area.html
