Geographic and Phylodynamic Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Origin

Elijah Kolawole Oladipo, Emmanuel Oluwatobi Dairo, Ayodele Eugene Ayeni, Boluwatife Ayobami Irewolede, Moyosoluwa Precious Oyewole, Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji, Julius Kola Oloke
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.13.21263432

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally. Understanding the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the environment is essential for infection control policies. This study aims to provide a phylodynamic analysis and distribution pattern of SARS-CoV-2 from the environment in terms of Source, clades, lineages, and their location. Ninety (90) retrieved whole-genome sequences of environmental sources from GISAID were investigated to determine the evolutionary process of SARS-CoV-2 and mutation in the isolated nucleotide sequences. The analysis was carried out using R, MAFFT, and MEGA X software. Out of the five countries studied, Austria has the highest distribution with sixty-five samples (72.2%), and the highest isolates of 68 (75.6%) were from raw sewage. The highest clade in circulation as obtained from the study is G with lineages B. The phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequences from Austria, the United States, China, Brazil, and Liechtenstein indicated that the SARS-CoV-2 viruses were all clustered together, irrespective of sequence geographic location. The study concluded by demonstrating a clear interconnection between the phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from various geographic locations, all of which were locked in the same cluster regardless of their environment specimen. Thus, depicting the possibility of their origination from a common ancestor.

Highlight

  • Environmental sources of specimen isolated from raw sewage have the highest occurring specimen sequence, while those from breathing air, door handle, and wastewater have the lowest sequence.

  • Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is of great importance to control the spread of the virus. Untreated raw sewage should be of more priority for the environmental surveillance of the virus.

  • Eighteen (18) nucleotide sequences from this study’s multiple sequence alignment shared a 90% similarity with the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome, indicating a common evolutionary origin.

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a novel RNA virus that belongs to a group of viruses that include SARS and MERS. There are more than 37 coronaviruses in the Coronaviridae family. Within the order, Nidovirales are responsible for causing COVID-19 which is responsible for causing disease that has an overwhelming effect on health care systems, economies, and societies of affected countries (Chin et al., 2020). Its outbreak was probably linked to a seafood market in the Wuhan City of China, where there is no credible evidence to support the rumors (Giovanetti et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Paraskevis et al., 2020). Still, investigations from evolutionary, genomic, and proteomic studies suggested that bats could be the natural host of the novel virus (Liu et al., 2020). Also, a study conducted by Liu et al. points out that the SARS CoV-2 virus has a 96.2% sequence resemblance with bat CoV, RaTG13, and also shares 79.5% similarity with SARS CoV, given its name according to the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee on February 11, 2020. Structurally, they are positive-sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) virions with characteristic spikes projecting from the surface of the capsid protein (Neuman et al., 2006; Barcena et al., 2009). They also possess a genome of 30 kb in length, the largest among members of the RNA viruses, alongside a 5’ cap and a 3’ poly (A) tail, to enable their translation (Chen et al., 2020). Coronaviruses are made up of four main proteins, spike (S), membrane (M), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins. The spike protein (∼150 kDa) mediates its attachment to host receptor proteins, allowing their entrance into the cell (Collins et al., 1982). The membrane protein (∼25 to 30 kDa) attaches with nucleocapsid and maintains the curvature of the virus membrane (Neuman et al., 2011). As an integral membrane protein with ion channel activity, the envelope protein (8 to 12 kDa) is responsible for the virus’s pathogenesis by facilitating the assembly and release of virion particles (Ruch and Machamer, 2012). Nucleocapsid, the fourth protein, helps in packaging virus particles into capsids and promotes the formation of the replicase-transcriptase complex (RTC) (McBride et al., 2014).

The recent rise in the case of COVID-19 that started around December 2019 had raised significant concerns for many researchers across the globe to find lasting solutions to mitigate its effect. The ease of transmission of Coronavirus infections among diverse hosts is likely to be associated with its’ rate of mutation and high occurrence of recombination inherent in its genome (Neuman et al., 2006; Barcena et al., 2009).

SARS-CoV-2, a variant of the Coronaviridae family of viruses, which comprises viruses that cause respiratory and intestinal infections, spreads primarily via microdroplets, indicating its ability to survive in humid environments (Chin et al., 2020).

The environmental roles and the potential risk of environmental factors on the transmission and prevalence of COVID-19 pandemics, such as climate change, fomites, water transfer, air, and food, have been highlighted in some recent studies (Eslami and Jalili, 2020; Qu et al., 202; Wigginton et al., 2020). In the survey carried out by Kampf et al. (2020), emphasis was laid on the preeminence of inanimate surface contact to contribute to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 tends to survive on a surface for days at room temperature, thus increasing its chance of transmission via touch (Kampf et al., 2020; Van et al., 2020). Moreover, some recent studies have also validated the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewater treatment facilities (Hindson, 2020; Medema et al., 2020; Naddeo and Haizhou, 2020; Wurtzer et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). As of 5 March 2021, 115,094,614 confirm cases of COVID-19 were recorded globally including, 2,560,995 deaths (WHO Coronavirus Disease situation Dashboard, 2021), in which an individual could likely have been infected through environmental Source. The fact that COVID-19 patients can spread the virus raises questions about SARS-CoV-2 infiltrating different ecological systems. SARS-CoV-2 had been detected in wastewater, cleaning swabs, air, sewage sludge, and river waters around the world (Patel et al., 2021).

The deaths and morbidities linked to the COVID-19 pandemic necessitate further investigation into the role of the ecosystem, such as wastewater and water bodies, in the disease’s transmission; based on the reviewed literature, the current wealth of information on coronaviruses in wastewater is minimal, necessitating further research (Patel et al., 2021). It is essential to track the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 diversity through comparative genomics, which may provide more knowledge about the virus’s prevention and transmission routes. Kampf et al. (2020) and Ong et al. (2020) reported that asymptomatic patients might increase the disease’s rapid dissemination by active shedding of the virus leading to direct transmission by droplet route and indirect transmission through contact with the contaminated environment. Even though the propagative numbers in SARS-CoV-1 (∼2.7) and SARS-CoV-2 are similar, they are lower than airborne measles, suggesting that air transmission is not the major transmission route (Guerra et al., 2017). The emphasis of this study was more on the environmental Source from which the sequences were isolated to provide clues on the most likely route the virus could be transmitted within a given geographical region. In this study, we carried out a detailed analysis on the phylodynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and its distribution in environmental sources to provide a thorough understanding of environmental contamination by SARS-CoV-2 to help broaden the scope of knowledge on viral transmission route and also facilitate proper infection control precautions.

Materials and Methods

Retriever of Data

Whole-genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 isolates of environmental Source available in the GISAID database (https://www.epicov.org/epi3/frontend#57f16) as of 31 January 2021 was retrieved. A total of 101 SARS-CoV-2 complete sequences according to the filtering criteria (complete genome, environmental samples, high coverage level only, and low coverage excluded) were downloaded. The sequences came from 7 countries: Austria: 65 sequences, Brazil: 2 sequences, China: 16 sequences, Liechtenstein: 3 sequences, Hong Kong: 1 sequence, Netherlands: 6 sequences, and the USA: 8 sequences. Similarly, the sequences’ metadata was obtained from the GISAID database to obtain information about individual sequences. As a result of the missing information, which was inaccessible in the metadata collected online, 11 sequences were discarded out of the 101 sequences retrieved to arrive at 90 sequences. This, therefore, restricted the analyzed sequences to 5 countries as follows: Austria: 65 sequences, Brazil: 2 sequences, China: 14 sequences, Liechtenstein: 3 sequences, and the USA: 6 sequences. The table containing detailed information on the 90 SARS-CoV-2 sequences used in this study is provided as a Supplementary file (S1). The annotated reference genome sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (Accession number: NC_0455122) was downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database.

Metadata Analysis

This study uses the mined data retrieved alongside the nucleotide sequences on the GISAID database to analyze the variability of the SARS-CoV-2 genome from the environmental Source, subsequently to the onset of the pandemic to ascertain its evolutionary relationship and geographical distribution. Metadata analyses were performed using R. Graphical distributions of SARS-CoV-2 were constructed based on their location, environmental Source, clade, and lineage. Moreover, a distribution graph was constructed on account of the Source, clades, and lineages in relation to the location where they are isolated. Emphasis focused on the environmental Source from which the sequences were found to provide clues on the possible routes by which this virus may be transmitted within a given geographical location. Understanding this will help implement appropriate ethical policies, guidelines, and procedures that could effectively handle various environmental materials to mitigate the exponential spread of COVID-19 and diminish the future strain on the environment.

Multiple sequence alignment and evolutionary Analysis

The complete genome sequences of 90 SARS-CoV-2 obtained were aligned using MAFFT version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) against the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome (Accession number: NC_0455122), with all parameters set at default (Katoh et al., 2019; Kuraku et al., 2013). Based on the whole genome sequences, a maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X with 50 bootstraps resampling to ascertain the common antecedent among each strain (Tingting et al., 2020).

Result

Metadata Analysis

The result obtained during this study indicated that 101 out of the sequences retrieved from GISAID, Ninety (90) genomic sequences were subjected to metadata analysis. The geographical distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 sequence based on their locations revealed that Austria has the highest distribution with sixty-five samples (72.2% of the obtained isolates) deposited into the database, followed by fourteen samples from China (15.6% of the isolates). Subsequently, a sum of six SARS-CoV-2 sequences from the United States of America (6.7%), while both 2 and 3 SARS-CoV-2 sequences from Brazil (2.2%) and Liechtenstein (3.3%) respectively, of the isolates as seen in Fig. 1.

Figure 1:
Figure 1: Country Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source.

Moreover, based on environmental sources, specimen isolated from raw sewage has the highest distribution (68), occupying 75.6%. Also, nine (9) sequences were reported from the outer packaging of cold chain products, 10%, followed by six (6) sequences from an environmental swab of 6.7%. Both air and sewage have two sequences with 2.2% each while breathing air, door handle, and wastewater have one sequence with 1.1% respectively, as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2:
Figure 2: Environmental Source distribution of SARS-CoV-2.

Furthermore, the clade distribution across the sequences were 64 for the G clade (71.1 %), 14 for GR clade (15.6 %), 6 for GH clade (6.67 %), 4 for GV clade (4.44 %) and 2 for S clade (2.22%), as seen in Fig. 3.

Figure 3:
Figure 3: Clade distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source.

Sequel to the Lineage distribution, lineage B.1 has fifty-eight (58), which is the highest number of sequences (64.4 %), followed by lineage B.1.1.119 with twelve (12) sequences (13.3 %). Four (4) Lineages B.1.160, four (4) B.1.177, two (2) B.1.1.33 and two (2) B.1.235 with frequency of (4.44 %), (4.44 %), (2.22 %) and (2.22 %) respectively. The other eight lineages (A.1, A.3, B.1.1.232, B.1.177.24, B.1.2, B.1.258, B.1.283, and B.1.313) occurred once, corresponding to 1.11 % each as seen in Fig. 4.

Figure 4:
Figure 4: Lineage distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source.

Regarding the specimen obtained relative to their geographical distribution, sixty-eight samples from both Austria (65) and Liechtenstein (3) were isolated from raw sewage Source, while two samples from Brazil were gotten from sewage. Fourteen samples from China were obtained from the environmental swab (5) and the outer package of cold chain products (9), respectively. Six samples from the USA were from the air (2), breathing air (1), door handle (1), environmental swab (1), and wastewater (1), as shown in Fig.5.

Figure 5:
Figure 5: Environmental Source distribution of SARS-CoV-2 per Country.

In addition, the clade obtained relative to the geographical distribution shows four different clades from Austria in the order of G (56), GH (3), GR (2), GV (4), then followed by the USA with three; G (1), GH (3), S (2) and subsequently by China with two; G (4), GR (10), while Brazil and Liechtenstein have GR (2) and G (3) clade respectively as seen in Fig.6.

Figure 6:
Figure 6: Clade distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source per country.

However, the lineage obtained with respect to the geographical distribution reveals that eight lineages B.1 (50), B.1.1.119 (2), B.1.1.232 (1), B.1.160 (4), B.1.177 (4), B.1.177.24 (1), B.1.235 (2), B.1.258 (1) were originated from Austria, six lineages A.1 (1), A.3 (1), B.1 (1), B.1.2 (1), B.1.283 (1), B.1.313 (1) from USA, two lineages B.1 (4), B.1.1.119 (10) from China. Also, Brazil and Liechtenstein have lineage B.1.133 (2) and B.1 (3), respectively, as seen in Fig.7.

Figure 7:
Figure 7: Lineage distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source per Country.

Multiple Sequence Alignment

The multiple sequence alignment carried out shows a mutation in the genome of the isolated nucleotide sequences, as seen in Fig.8 below. Eighteen (18) of the nucleotide sequences showed a 90% similarity with the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome indicating a common source of evolution.

Figure 8:
Figure 8: Multiple Sequence Alignment of SARs-CoV2 from Environmental Source

Phylogenetic Analysis

Primarily, for the 90 SAR-CoV-2 sequences retrieved, a rooted circular tree was constructed to explain the spread, distribution, and evolutionary process of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment across five (5) countries, as indicated in Fig.9.

Figure 9:
Figure 9: Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Source

(The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model (TNM) (Tamura and Nei, 1993). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 50 replicates (Kumar et al., 2018) is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed (Kumar et al., 2018). Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−41909.75) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were automatically obtained by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Tamura-Nei model and selecting the topology with a superior log-likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch length measured in the sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + noncoding. This analysis involved 91 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 29910 positions in the final dataset (Felsenstein, 1985)

Discussion

The geographic distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 sequence base on their locations revealed that Austria has the highest number of distribution while sequences from Brazil and Liechtenstein have the lowest (Fig. 1). Austria is a country in central Europe with a population of 8.8 million and has a highly developed national epidemiological surveillance program. As of 7 August 2020, contact tracing had been performed for all 21,821 reported SARS-CoV-2–positive cases. Epidemiological clusters were linked to 10,385 of these cases. Integration of phylogenetic analysis of Austrian SARS-CoV-2 sequences with epidemiological data resulted in a strong overlap of these two lines of evidence, with 199 of the 345 sequences (65%) assigned to epidemiological clusters (Popa et al., 2020), in contrast to Brazil and Liechtenstein, where SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological surveillance was insufficient due to their middle-income status. Moreover, there are several controversies about the Brazilian government’s approach to the outbreak. This is evidenced by their President’s resistance to social distancing measures and underestimating the significance of the COVID-19 safety procedure (Lancet, 2020).

Droplets primarily transfer SARS viruses from a respiratory infection at a distance of about 5µm, but they can also be transmitted indirectly through fomite through contact with infected objects, fecal-oral routes, and airborne transmission (Wang et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2016; Kitajima et al., 2020; Naddeo and Liu, 2020). The results of the SARS-CoV-2 environmental source distribution show that specimens isolated from raw sewage have the highest frequency of sequences, while those from breathing air, door handles, and wastewater has the lowest frequency (Figure 2.). SARS-CoV-2 in raw sewage occurrence will always be more than breathing air, door handle because sewage has higher nutrient level to sustain the virus than breathing air, door handle. This relates to Cheng et al. (2020) findings on air and environmental samples of SARS-CoV-2 around hospital patients with COVID-19. Their investigation highlighted that all samples collected from airs source were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in singly isolated patients in airborne infection isolation rooms. Contamination levels on mobile phone surfaces and door handles were found to be lower than in other environmental samples. Following this, Gundy et al. (2020) and Ahmed et al. (2020) reported coronavirus RNA detection in the feces of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS and COVID-19 patients via raw sewage. They concluded their study by hypothesizing the virus’s persistence in sewage for 14 days at 4°C and 2 days at 20°C, as well as the possibility of detecting its RNA within eight days.

Due to viral susceptibility to disinfectants and poor environmental stability, SARS-CoV-2 may pose a lower risk in wastewater than in sewage (Randazzo et al., 2020; Rimoldi et al., 2020). Reports from two hospital facilities in Beijing, China, reveal that SARS-CoV-2 RNA may be detected in raw sewage, even though there is sometimes no live SARS-CoV-2 following chlorine disinfection. SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from both feces and urine, and its RNA was also found in both (Wang et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2, on the other hand, was detected for days on personal items, toilet, room, and floor surfaces, as well as plastic, stainless steel, copper, and cardboard (Santarpia et al., 2020; Van et al., 2020). Persistence on inanimate surfaces such as wood, ceramics, aluminum, glass, waste, containers, bags were also recorded for days. (Santarpia et al., 2020; Van et al., 2020).

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage and stool could lead to faecal-oral transmission via aerosolization from toilet flushing, a leaky plumbing system, and other sources (Heller et al., 2020). This could be supported by the findings of Van et al. (2020), as observed from this study’s findings. They reported a higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2 viral aerosol transmission in feces among infected individuals in Italian cities, probably attributable to aerosol exposure. In the wide global spread of COVID-19, aerosol transmission could be a more plausible route than faecal-oral transmission. According to findings from previous research, some researchers confirm the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by air as the main route of transmission.

In contrast, other researchers supported aerosol transmission based on their support for asymptomatic individuals (Van et al., 2020). Morawska and Cao (2020) demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 could remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces for up to days, highlighting the plausibility of both aerosol and fomite transmission. Furthermore, Fear et al. (2020) observed that SARS-CoV-2 generally maintains infectivity while airborne over short distances and persist for more extended periods than when produced as respiratory particles, based on their findings. In most developing countries with poor waste management strategies, waste collectors and pickers may transfer contaminated solid waste and then retransmitted it back to the community (Nghiem et al., 2020).

Coronaviruses are genetically diverse, with a high proclivity for genetic mutations and gene recombination, which increases the possibility of interspecies transmission (Helmy et al., 2020). According to our findings, Austria has the most significant number of sequences, clades, and lineages contributed to the database. In contrast, sequences from Brazil and Liechtenstein have the lowest number of sequences, clades, and lineages (Figures 5 -7). Eighteen (18) nucleotide sequences from this study’s multiple sequence alignment shared a 90% similarity with the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome, indicating common evolutionary origins (Figure 8). This could be linked to the patients’ travel history to the infection’s hotspot (China). The phylodynamic analyses revealed when an epidemic began in a given population and the time of the most recent common ancestor of sampled virus isolates (Sang, 2020). The phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 specimen sequences (Fig. 9) indicates that the sequence from the United States has numerous points of interaction with the sequence from Austria.

In contrast, the sequence from China has similar homology with the sequence from Austria, although the sequence from Qingdao is primarily exclusive to Qingdao, the sequences from Brazil have a lot in common with the sequences from Austria and Qingdao. The phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequences from Austria, the United States, China, Brazil, and Liechtenstein indicated that the SARS-CoV-2 viruses were all clustered together, irrespective of sequence geographic location. The results obtained suggest the possibility of a recent common ancestor for all SARS-CoV-2 or the transmission of the virus strain across the countries.

In conclusion, this study shows the interconnectedness of the genetic relatedness of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from various geographic locations, all of which are locked in the same cluster regardless of their environmental specimen. These show how they could have shared an ancestor. Furthermore, the high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 from environmental sources in specimens isolated from raw sewage samples suggests that sewage may be a possible route for virus transmission. To further prevent the spread of the deadly virus, sewage generated from various healthcare and isolation centers must be properly treated before being discharged into the environment.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the GISAID community and authors from the originating laboratories responsible for the genetic sequence data shared via the GISAID Initiative, on which this research is based. Special thanks to Helix Biogen Institute, Ogbomoso, Nigeria, for the technical support.

References

  1. ↵
    Ahmed, W., Angel, N., Edson, J., Bibby, K., Bivins, A., O’Brien, J.W., et al., 2020. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138764
  2. ↵
    Barcena M, Oostergetel GT, Bartelink W, Faas FG, Verkleij A, Rottier PJ, Koster AJ, Bosch BJ. 2009. Cryo-electron tomography of mouse hepatitis virus: insights into the structure of the coronavirion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805270106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. 2020. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol 92:418–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Cheng, V.C., Wong, S., Chan, V.W., Yung-Chun So, S., Chen, J.H., Yip, C.C., Chan, K., Chu, H., Chung, T.W., Sridhar, S., To, K.K., Chan, J.F. MD,3 Hung, I.F., Ho, P., and Yuen, 2020. Air and environmental sampling for SARS-CoV-2 around hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol., 8: 1–8. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Chin, A.W.H., Chu, J.T.S., Perera, M.R.A., Hui, K.P.Y., Yen, H.-L., Chan, M.C.W., Peiris, M., Poon, L.L.M., 2020. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. The Lancet Microbe 5247, 1. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.15.20036673
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Collins AR, Knobler RL, Powell H, Buchmeier MJ. 1982. Monoclonal antibodies to murine hepatitis virus-4 (strain JHM) define the viral glycoprotein responsible for attachment and cell– cell fusion. Virology 119:358 –371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(82)90095-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Eslami, H., Jalili, M., 2020. The role of environmental factors to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). AMB Expr. 10, 92.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Fears, A.C., Klimstra, W.B., Duprex, P., Hartman, A., Weaver, S.C., Plante, K.S., et al., 2020. Comparative dynamic aerosol efficiencies of three emergent coronaviruses and the unusual persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosol suspensions. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20063784.
  9. ↵
    Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Giovanetti, M., Benvenuto, D., Angeletti, S., and Ciccozzi, M. (2020). The first two cases of 2019-nCoV in Italy: where they come from? J. Med. Virol. 92, 518–521. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. Grunig, G., Durmus, N., Marsh, L., 2020. New coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: Complexities resulting in a tragedy. Preprints 2020 https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0407.v22020040407
  12. ↵
    Guerra, F. M., Bolotin, S., Lim G, et al. 2017. The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis; 17: e420–e428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. Gundy, P.M., Gerba, C.P., Pepper, I.L., 2009. Survival of coronaviruses in water and wastewater. Food and Environmental Virology 1, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-008-9001-6.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Heller, L., Mota, C.R., Greco, D.B., 2020. COVID-19 faecal-oral transmission: are we asking the right questions? Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138919.
  15. ↵
    Helmy, Y.A., Fawzy, M., Elaswad, A. and Sobieh, A., Kenne, S.P., and Shehata, A.A. 2020. The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review of Taxonomy, Genetics, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control, J. Clin. Med. 9:1225
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Hindson Jordan. 2020. COVID-19: faecal–oral transmission? Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2020). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41575-020-0295-7
  17. ↵
    Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S. and Steinmann, E. 2020. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 246–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S., Steinmann, E., 2020. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect. 104, 246–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Katoh, Rozewicki, Yamada 2019 (Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:1160-1166) Access the recommendation on F1000 MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    Kitajima, M., Ahmed, W., Bibby, K., Carducci, A., Gerbaet, C., Hamilton, K., et al., 2020. SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: state of the knowledge and research needs. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints2020040460.v1.
  21. ↵
    Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., and Tamura K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:1547–1549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Kuraku, Zmasek, Nishimura, Katoh 2013 (Nucleic Acids Research 41:W22-W28) a Leaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Liu, Z., Xiao, X., Wei, X., Li, J., Yang, J., Tan, H., et al. (2020). Composition and divergence of coronavirus spike proteins and host ACE2 receptors predict potential intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 92, 595–601. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    McBride R, van Zyl M, Fielding BC. 2014. The coronavirus nucleocapsid is a multifunctional protein. Viruses 6:2991–3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6082991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Medema, G., Heijnen, L., Elsinga, G., Italiaander, R. and Brouwer, A., 2020. Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in sewage. MedRxiv.
  26. Mol, M.P.G., Caldas, S., 2020. Can the human coronavirus epidemic also spread through solid waste? Waste Manag. Res. 38 (5), 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0734242X20918312.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Morawska, L., Cao, J., 2020. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: the world should face the reality. Environ. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730.
  28. Mounia, A., Soufiane, A., Younes, C. Alaoui, F., Noureddine, B. and Wafaa B. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 in hospital wastewater during outbreak of COVID-19: A review on detection, survival and disinfection technologies, Science of The Total Environment, 761: 143192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    Naddeo Vincenzo and Haizhou Liu. 2020. Editorial Perspectives: 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): what is its fate in urban water cycle and how can the water research community respond? Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. DOI: 10.1039/D0EW90015J
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    Naddeo, V., Liu, H., 2020. Editorial perspectives: 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV 2): what is its fate in urban water cycle and how can the water research community respond? Environmental Science Water Research & Technology 6, 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW90015J.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Neuman BW, Adair BD, Yoshioka C, Quispe JD, Orca G, Kuhn P, Milligan RA, Yeager M, Buchmeier MJ. 2006. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J Virol 80:7918 –7928. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00645-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Neuman BW, Kiss G, Kunding AH, Bhella D, Baksh MF, Connelly S, Droese B, Klaus JP, Makino S, Sawicki SG, Siddell SG, Stamou DG, Wilson IA, Kuhn P, Buchmeier MJ. 2011. A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. J Struct Biol 174:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Nghiem, L., Morgan, B., Donner, E., Short, M.D., 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: considerations for the waste and wastewater services sector. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100006.
  34. ↵
    Ong, S.W.X., Tan, Y.K., Chia, P.Y., Lee, T.H., Ng, O.T., Wong, M.S.Y. and Marimuthu, K. 2020. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic Patient. JAMA, 323, 1610–1612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Paraskevis, D., Kostaki, E. G., Magiorkinis, G., Panayiotakopoulos, G., Sourvinos, G., and Tsiodras, S. (2020). Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infect. Gene. Evolut. 79:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104212.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    Patel, M., Chaubey, A., Pittman Jr, C. Dinesh, T. 2021. Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in the environment: Occurrence, persistence, analysis in aquatic systems and possible management. Science of the Total Environment Volume 765: 142698
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Popa, A., Genger, J., Nicholson, M. D., Penz, T., Schmid, D. et al., 2020. Genomic epidemiology of superspreading events in Austria reveals mutational dynamics and transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2 Science Translational Medicine, Vol. 12, Issue 573, eabe2555
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Qu, G.B., Li, X.D., Hu, L.G., Jiang, G.B., 2020. An Imperative Need for Research on the Role of Environmental Factors in Transmission of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 3730–3732.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Randazzo, W., Truchado, P., Cuevas-Ferrando, E., Simón, P., Allende, A., Sánchez, G., 2020b. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater anticipated COVID-19 occurrence in a low prevalence area. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115942.
  40. ↵
    Rimoldi, S.G., Stefani, F., Gigantiello, A., Polesello, S., Comandatore, F., Mileto, D., et al., 2020. Presence and vitality of SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewaters and rivers. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.20086009.
  41. ↵
    Ruch TR, Machamer CE. 2012. The coronavirus E protein: assembly and beyond. Viruses 4:363–382. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4030363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Sang Chul Choi (2020). A phylodynamic analysis of epidemiological situation of East Asia due to the coronavirus disease of 2019. Korean Journal of Microbiology (2020) Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 241-253, DOI https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2020.0068.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Santarpia, J.L., Rivera, D.N., Herrera, V., Morwitzer, M.J., Creager, H., Santarpia, GW, et al., 2020. Transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 in viral shedding observed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. MedRxIV https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.23.20039446.
  44. Science & Technology 50 (10), 5077–5085. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00876.
  45. ↵
    Sun, J., Zhu, A., Li, H., Zheng, K., Zhuang, Z., Chen, Z., et al., 2020. Isolation of infectious SARS-CoV-2 from urine of a COVID-19 patient. Emerging Microbes & Infections 9 (1), 991–993.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Tamura K. and Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10:512–526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. The Lancet 2020. COVID-19 in Brazil: “So what? “Lancet.; 3951461
  48. ↵
    Tingting Li, Dongxia Liu, Yadi Yang, Jiali Guo, Yujie Feng3, Xinmo Zhang, Shilong Cheng & Jie, F. 2020. Phylogenetic supertree reveals detailed evolution of SARS□CoV□2. Scientific Reports 10:22366 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79484-8.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D.H., Holbrook, M.G., Gamble, A., Williamson, B.N., et al., 2020. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 382 (16), 1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Wang, J., Feng, H., Zhang, S., Ni, Z., Ni, L., Chen, Y., et al., 2020d. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection of hospital isolation wards hygiene monitoring during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in a Chinese hospital. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. WHO, 2020a. Interim Guidance.
  52. ↵
    Wang, X.W., Li, J.S., Jin, M., Zhen, B., Kong, QX, Song, N., et al., 2005. Study on the resistance of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J. Virol. Methods, 126 (1–2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.02.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) situation Dashboard (https://covid19.who.int/)
  54. ↵
    Wigginton, K.R., Boehm, A.B., 2020. Environmental Engineers and Scientists Have Important Roles to Play in Stemming Outbreaks and Pandemics Caused by Enveloped Viruses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 3736–3739.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    Wu FQ; Xiao A; Zhang JB; Gu XQ; Lee WL; Kauffman K; Hanage WP; Matus M; Ghaeli N; Endo N; Duvallet C; Moniz K; Erickson TB; Chai PR; Thompson J; Alm EJ. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected from clinically confirmed cases. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20051540
  56. ↵
    Wurtzer S, Marechal V, Mouchel JM, & Moulin L. 2020. Time course quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Parisian wastewaters correlates with COVID-19 confirmed cases. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.12.20062679
  57. ↵
    Ye, Y., Ellenberg, R.M., Graham, K.E., Wigginton, K.R., 2016. Survivability, partitioning, and recovery of enveloped viruses in untreated municipal wastewater. Environmental
  58. Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Zhu, S., Shu, C., Wang, D., Song, J., et al., 2020. Isolation of 2019-nCoV from a stool specimen of a laboratory-confirmed case of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19). China CDC Weekly 2 (8), 123–124. http://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2020.033.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted September 16, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Geographic and Phylodynamic Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Origin
Elijah Kolawole Oladipo, Emmanuel Oluwatobi Dairo, Ayodele Eugene Ayeni, Boluwatife Ayobami Irewolede, Moyosoluwa Precious Oyewole, Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji, Julius Kola Oloke
medRxiv 2021.09.13.21263432; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.13.21263432
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area