ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate clinical and health system factors associated with receiving catheter ablation (CA) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).
Study Design and Setting We used hospital administrative data linked with death registrations in New South Wales, Australia for patients with a primary diagnosis of AF between 2009 and 2017. We investigated factors associated with receiving CA (using Cox regression) and early ablation (using logistic regression).
Results Cardioversion during index admission (hazard ratio [HR] 1.96; 95% CI 1.75 – 2.19), year of index admission (HR 1.07; 1.07; 95% CI 1.05 – 1.10), private patient status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 2.35 – 2.97), and living in more advantaged areas (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13 – 1.22) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving CA. Private patient status (odds ratio [OR] 2.04; 95% CI 1.59 – 2.61) and a history of cardioversion (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.0 – 1.57) and diabetes (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.06 – 2.41) were associated with receiving early ablation.
Conclusion Beyond clinical factors, private patients are more likely to receive CA and earlier ablation than their public counterparts. Whether the earlier access to ablation procedures in private patients is leading to differences in outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation remains to be explored.
What is new?
What is new?
Key findings
Private patient status had the strongest effect on the likelihood and odds of receiving catheter ablation and early ablation compared to other clinical and health system factors
Cardioversion during index admission, year of index admission, and living in more advantaged areas were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving catheter ablation, while older age and a history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and myocardial infarction were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving catheter ablation.
Cardioversion during index admission and a history of diabetes were also associated with higher odds of receiving early ablation.
What it adds
Given the growing evidence of the effectiveness of catheter ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, this study demonstrates the associations between clinical and health system factors and receiving catheter ablation and early ablation.
Implications
Clinicians and policymakers should review existing policies to ensure effective procedures for atrial fibrillation are available to the whole population, rather than those who are more advantaged.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), project grant No. APP1184304. Creation of the linked dataset was funded by a NHMRC Project Grant No. 1147430. MOF is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship No. 1139133.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was granted ethical approval by the University of New South Wales, NSW Population and Health Services Research (HREC/18/CIPHS/56), Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of NSW (1503/19), and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2018/2/431) research ethics committees.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable
