ABSTRACT
Background The contribution of children to viral spread in schools is still under debate.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to investigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the school setting.
Methods Literature searches from April, 2021 and repeated on May, 15th 2021 yielded a total of 1088 publications: screening, contact tracing and seroprevalence studies.
MOOSE guidelines were followed and data analyzed using random-effects models.
Results From screening studies involving more than 120,000 subjects, we estimated 0.31% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.05-0.81%) SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence in schools. Contact tracing studies, involving a total of 112,622 contacts of children and adults, showed that onward viral transmission was limited (2.54%; 95%CI 0.76-5.31). Young index cases were found to be 74% significantly less likely than adults to favor viral spread (Odds Ratio [OR]=0.26; 95%CI 0.11-0.63) and were less susceptible to infection (OR=0.60; 95% CI 0.25-1.47). Finally, from seroprevalence studies, with a total of 17,879 subjects involved, we estimated that children are 43% significantly less likely than adults to test positive for antibodies (OR=0.57; 95%CI: 0.49-0.68).
In conclusion, testing all subjects in schools, independently of symptoms, students less likely than adults favor viral spread and SARS-CoV-2 circulation in schools was found to be limited.
Question What is the infectivity and susceptibility of students and staff exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the school setting?
Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis of all available data shows that SARS-CoV-2 viral spread is limited and child-to-adult transmission in the school setting scarce.
Summary estimates indicate that young index cases were 74% significantly less likely than adults to favor viral spread and children are 43% less susceptible than adults.
Meaning Overall, SARS-CoV-2 circulation in schools was limited and could be reasonably controlled with appropriate mitigation measures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
HORIZON-HLTH-2021-CORONA-01: EuCARE project n. 101046016
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Meta-analyses of published data
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data available on request from the authors