Abstract
There continues to be a great need for rapid, accurate, and cost-effective point-of-care devices that can diagnose the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus and development of IgG and IgM antibody responses in early and late stages of COVID-19 disease. Here, we describe a versatile multiplexed electrochemical (EC) sensor platform modified with an antifouling nanocomposite coating that enables single-molecule CRISPR/Cas-based molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA with on-chip signal validation as well as multiplexed serological detection of antibodies against three SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens. The CRISPR-based EC platform achieved 100% accuracy for detection of viral RNA and showed an excellent correlation with RT-qPCR using 30 clinical saliva samples. The serology EC platform obtained 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, as well as 94% specificity and 82% sensitivity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM with 112 clinical plasma samples. These data demonstrate that integration of CRISPR-based RNA detection and serological assays with antifouling nanocomposite-based EC sensors enables performance as good or better than traditional laboratory-based techniques.
Competing Interest Statement
HDP, PJ, JJC, DEI are inventors in patents describing the CRISPR electronics technology. PJ and DEI are listed as inventors on patents describing the electrochemical sensor platform. JJC and DRW are cofounders and directors of Sherlock Biosciences. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University and the Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group. J.R. was funded through the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) GW4 FRESH CDT. H.D.P. was supported by the Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH-funded program (P30 AI060354), which is supported by the following NIH co-funding and participating Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NICHD, NIDCR, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, NIA, NIDDK, NINR, NIMHD, FIC, and OAR. The MGH/MassCPR COVID biorepository was supported by a gift from Ms. Enid Schwartz, by the Mark and Lisa Schwartz Foundation, the Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness and the Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
De-identified clinical saliva samples from the Dominican Republic were obtained from Boca Biolistics under their ethical approvals. RT-qPCR was performed by Boca Biolistics using the Perkin Elmer New Coronavirus Nucleic Acid Detection kit. De-identified clinical plasma samples were obtained from the Crimson Biomaterials Collection Core Facility at Partners Healthcare (currently Mass General Brigham). Additional de-identified clinical plasma and saliva samples were obtained through the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MassCPR) and had been collected by Prof. Jonathan Li and Prof. Xu Yu. Additional pre-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic samples were obtained from the Walt Laboratory at Brigham and Women s Hospital. The Institutional Review Board at the MGH, MGB, and Harvard University as well as the Harvard Committee on Microbiological Safety approved the use of the clinical samples in this study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of this work can be found in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
