Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and worldwide. Obesity - a worldwide public health concern - is a known risk factor for cancer including CRC. However, the mechanisms underlying the link between CRC and obesity have yet to be fully elucidated in part because of the molecular heterogeneity of CRC. We hypothesized that obesity modulates CRC in a consensus molecular subtype (CMS)-dependent manner.
Methods RNA-seq data and associated tumor and patient characteristics including body weight and height data for 232 patients were obtained from The Cancer Genomic Atlas – Colon Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-COAD) database. Tumor samples were classified into the four CMSs with the CMScaller R package; Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and categorized as normal, overweight, and obese.
Results We observed a significant difference in CMS categorization between BMI categories. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between obese and overweight samples and normal samples differed across the CMSs, and associated prognostic analyses indicated that the DEGs had differing effects on survival. Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, we found differences in Hallmark gene set enrichment between obese and overweight samples and normal samples across the CMSs. We constructed Protein-Protein Interaction networks and observed differences in obesity-regulated hub genes for each CMS. Finally, we analyzed and found differences in predicted drug sensitivity between obese and overweight samples and normal samples across the CMSs.
Conclusions Thus, we conclude that obesity has CMS-specific effects on the CRC tumor transcriptome.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The National Center for Advancing Translational Research of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) https://ncats.nih.gov/ (UL1TR003096-01, MG and EL) and the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)Hatch Grant https://nifa.usda.gov/program/hatch-act-1887-multistate-research-fund(ALA044-1-18037,MG).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Auburn University Institutional Review Board (#20-509 EX 2010). The study was determined not to qualify as human subject research under federal regulation 45 CFR 46.101(b)(4) from the Auburn University Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are fully available without restriction.