Abstract
Air leak syndromes, such as pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum, are commonly diagnosed in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. However, this finding is usually detected with radiographic studies when the neonate is in poor condition. LED transillumination is an alternative method that allows a fast, inexpensive, and non-invasive diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of LED transillumination in neonates by comparing the results to chest and abdomen radiograph as reference test.
Methodology diagnostic and prospective study that included 56 neonates. We used a simple and inexpensive handcrafted LED transilluminator to evaluate the chest and abdomen of patients, blind to the final diagnosis. The findings were compared to the radiographs.
Results the study presented 3 true positive pneumothorax cases (sensibility 100%, 95%CI 29.24-100; specificity 100%, 95%CI 93.28-100), 1 true positive pneumoperitoneum case (sensibility 100%, 95%CI 2.50-100; specificity 100%, 95%CI 93.51-100), 10 true positive and 5 false negatives cases of gastric dilation (sensibility 66.67%, 95%CI 38.38-88.18; specificity 100%, 95%CI 91.19-100; negative likelihood ratio 0.33, 95%CI 0.16-0.68) and 4 true positive cases of dilation of bowel loops (sensibility 100%, 95%CI 39.76-100; specificity 100%, 95%CI 93.02-100).
Discussion LED transillumination is a safe, inexpensive, and easy-to-use clinical tool that may be employed to promote early intervention during severe cases of air leak syndrome that require immediate action, especially in low-income and rural areas. Further research with larger sample sizes is required to properly define the efficacy and usefulness of LED transillumination in routine use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors did not receive funds from their institutions or any other party. The submitted work was funded by the authors themselves.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Before execution, the work was proposed to the Bioethics Committee of the Hospital Central de Maracay. The work was approved without observations.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data collected during the study is stored in the personal computer of the authors, as well as in a private cloud-based storage system. If required, such data is readily-available for revision.
