Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the standard of treatment for many cancers. However, the same treatments showed disappointing outcomes in cervical cancer so far. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that support the immune tolerance of cervical cancer will provide a way to design new strategies to enhance immunotherapies. Here, we characterized cellular compositions of the immune infiltrates in cervical cancer and investigated if the tumor immune landscape is a predictor for patient prognosis. The fraction of ten immune infiltrates of cervical and other cancers were analyzed by using QuanTIseq software base on the bulk mRNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA). Cervical cancer is one of the cancers that had the lowest percentage of total immune infiltrates, but it had the highest ratio for CD8 T cells to all immune infiltrates among all solid cancers. Both the principal components (PCA) analysis and heatmap with dendrogram analysis showed that cervical cancer had a similar immune infiltrated microenvironment with other squamous cell carcinomas, such as head and neck cancer and lung squamous cell cancer. The PCA and heatmap with dendrogram analysis showed that cervical cancer and HPV positive head and neck cancers were clustered more closer and partially separated with HPV negative head and neck cancer. Further analysis showed that HPV-positive cervical and head and neck cancers had a significantly higher level of CD8 T cells and M1-liked macrophages, but a lower level of M2 macrophages. The survival analysis showed that a higher level of CD8 T cells was associated with a better patient prognosis. However, immuno-suppressive immune infiltrates including M2 macrophages and Treg cells that are known to suppress anti-tumor immunity also demonstrated positive patient overall survival. Our study provided a conceptual framework to understand the tumor immune microenvironment of cervical cancer. Our results also demonstrated that the immune infiltrates can be a prognosis marker for cervical cancer.
Simple Summary Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. There are relatively limited treatment options for late-stage cervical cancer. Immunotherapy is a new therapeutic treatment developed with great success in treating many cancers, but the same treatment has not been producing satisfactory results in many cases of cervical cancer. In the present study, we provided a comprehensive immune characterization specifically for cervical cancer. We determined the prognostic value of a specific subtype of tumor-infiltrating immune cells for clinical outcomes and demonstrated that HPV infection affected the immune cell infiltration and induce pro-inflammatory phenotypes. Our study provides a systematic insight into the tumor immune microenvironment of cervical cancers and offers a conceptual framework for the future design of rational combination treatment strategies to improve immunotherapy outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, all data were from existing and deidentified public datasets.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos