ABSTRACT
Objectives Care homes have experienced a high number of COVID-19 outbreaks, and it is therefore important for care home employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is vaccine hesitancy at a greater rate among this group than in the wider community. We aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to getting the COVID-19 vaccine, as well as views on potential mandatory vaccination policies.
Design Semi-structured interviews.
Setting Care home employees in North West England. Interviews conducted in April 2021.
Participants 10 care home employees (aged 25 to 61 years old) in the North West, who had been invited to have, but had not yet received, the COVID-19 vaccine.
Results We analysed the interviews using a framework analysis. Our analysis identified eight themes: perceived risk of COVID-19, efficacy of the vaccine, concerns about the vaccine, mistrust in authorities, facilitators to getting the vaccine, views on potential mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies, negative experiences of care work during the COVID-19 pandemic, and communication challenges.
Conclusions The care home employees interviewed at the time of this study reported a low perceived risk of COVID-19, alongside concerns over the efficacy of the vaccine, side effects, and speed of vaccine development, which is exacerbated by mistrust in authorities. Facilitators to getting the vaccine included wanting to protect others, perceived severity of COVID-19, and workplace norms. Making COVID-19 vaccination a condition of deployment may not result in increased willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccination, with most care home employees in this study favouring leaving their job rather than getting vaccinated. At a time when many of the workers already had negative experiences of care work during the pandemic due to perceived negative judgment from others and a perceived lack of support facing care home employees, policies that require vaccination as a condition of deployment were not positively received.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Public Health England (PHE) Research Ethics and Governance Group (REGG) exempted this study from requiring ethical approval because the study involved interviewing care home workers in their professional capacity. No identifiable information was collected, and all participants opted into the study and provided informed consent prior to participation.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.