Abstract
Purpose We sought to understand how the experiences of people in the UK with pre-existing mental health conditions had developed during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods In September-October 2020 we interviewed adults with mental health conditions pre-dating the pandemic, whom we had previously interviewed three months earlier. Participants had been recruited through online advertising and voluntary sector community organisations. Interviews were conducted by telephone or video-conference by researchers with lived experience of mental health difficulties, and explored changes over time in people’s experience of the pandemic.
Results We interviewed 44 people, achieving diversity of demographic characteristics and a range of mental health conditions and service use among our sample. Three overarching themes were derived from interviews. The first theme “Spectrum of adaptation”: to difficulties in access to, or the quality of, statutory mental health services, through developing new personal coping strategies or identifying alternative sources of support. The second theme is “Accumulating pressures”: from pandemic-related anxieties and sustained disruption to social contact and support, and to mental health treatment. The third theme “Feeling overlooked”: A sense of people with pre-existing mental health conditions being overlooked during the pandemic by policy-makers at all levels. The latter was compounded for people from ethnic minority communities or with physical health problems.
Conclusion Our study highlights the need to support marginalised groups who are at risk of increased inequalities, and to maintain crucial mental and physical healthcare and social care for people with existing mental health conditions, notwithstanding challenges of the pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This paper presents independent research commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme conducted by the NIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) (grant no. PR-PRU-0916-22003) in Mental Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or its arms length bodies, or other government departments. The study was further supported through funding from UK Research and Innovation, through the Loneliness and Social Isolation in Mental Health Research Network. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UKRI.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the UCL Research Ethics Committee on 19/12/2019 (ref: 15249/001). An amended topic guide was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee on 04/05/2020.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Prisha Shah and Jackie hardy are joint first authors.
AP, SJ, BLE are supported by the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.
Data Availability
Interview transcripts are not publicly available to ensure individual participants are not identifiable in accordance with participants' consent and study ethical approvals.
